The aim of this study is to compare the effects of localized vibration and dry needling applied to the trigger point in the individuals with acute myofascial pain syndrome.Pressure pain threshold (PPT) was used for the primary outcome measure of the study, and pain intensity, pain tolerance and short form (SF-36) were used for secondary outcome measures.
The patients were divided into two groups as dry needling and localized vibration using the permuted block randomization method. The study was completed with 20 (17 women, 3 men) in the dry needling group and 20 in localized vibration (15 women, 5 men). In both applications, a total of 3 sessions were made to the patients at 1-day intervals.Patients' age, gender, duration of pain, localization, presence of additional disease, drug use were questioned and recorded. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) was used for the primary outcome measure of the study, and pain intensity, pain tolerance and short form (SF-36) were used for secondary outcome measures. All evaluation criteria except SF-36 were made before, immediately after and 1 day after each session, 1 week after the last session. SF-36 was evaluated before the 1st session treatment, after the 3rd session treatment and 1 week after the 3rd session treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
40
Local twitch responses (LTRs) were obtained by multiple rapid insertions of the needle in and out of the point, similar to Hong's rapid-entry and rapid exit technique. Hong 1994). The needle was not removed from that site for the maximum stimulation time of 1 minute to 3 minutes after a local twitch response was obtained.
the vibration was applied with 110 Hz and 5.57 mm amplitude.
Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training & Research Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Pressure pain threshold
The test determines the amount of pressure over a given area in which a steadily increasing nonpainful pressure stimulus turns into a painful pressure sensation
Time frame: Change from baseline pressure pain threshold score at immediately after, 1 day after and 1 week after the last session
Visual analog scale
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a measurement instrument that tries to measure a characteristic or attitude that is believed to range across a continuum of values and cannot easily be directly measured. The patients were asked to score between 0 and 10 for the severity of their pain. It was said that 0 on the scale means no pain, 10 means unbearable pain.
Time frame: Change from baseline VAS score at immediately after, 1 day after and 1 week after the last session
Pain tolerance
Using an algometer (WAGNER-FPK20), a pressure of 2.5 kg /cm2 will be applied to the trigger point and patients will be asked to measure their pain with VAS after pressure application. The severity of the pain felt by the patients after the application of pressure will be measured by VAS. The patients were asked to score between 0 and 10 for the severity of their pain. It was said that 0 on the scale means no pain, 10 means unbearable pain.
Time frame: Change from baseline Pain tolerance score at immediately after, 1 day after and 1 week after the last session
Short Form 36 (SF-36)
The scale consists of 36 items and these provide the measurement of 8 dimensions; physical function (10 items), social function (2 items), role limitations due to physical functions (4 items), role limitations due to emotional problems (3 items), mental health (5 items), energy / vitality (4 items), pain (2 items) and general perception of health (5 items).
Time frame: Change from baseline Short Form 36 score at immediately after the 3rd session and 1 week after the treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.