Feasibility and acceptability of an Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) compared with an EMA plus automated text message intervention for stress management
The purpose of this study is to evaluate feasibility and acceptability of an Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) compared with an EMA plus automated text message intervention for stress management in participants with higher-than-average perceived stress conducted in a remote setting. Study details include: Study Duration: 7 months Intervention Duration: 3 weeks
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
81
1 wk of EMA (2 daily surveys per day delivered during waking hours to evaluate momentary affects) plus 2 weeks of EMA and FACE stress
Three weeks of EMA consisting of 2 daily surveys per day delivered during waking hours to evaluate ecological momentary affects.
Click Therapeutics
New York, New York, United States
Number of Participants Who Completed EMA and EMA Plus Text Message Intervention or EMA Intervention Alone.
The main outcome of the FACE STRESS study is to evaluate feasibility of an EMA and EMA plus text message intervention (EMA+), assessed by the number of completed individuals after the initial screening, from zero as worst to all subjects (best)
Time frame: 3 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.