This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2/3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of elenestinib (BLU-263) + symptom directed therapy (SDT) with placebo + SDT in participants with indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) whose symptoms are not adequately controlled by SDT. Parts 1 and 2 will enroll participants with ISM. Participants enrolled in Part 2 will roll over onto Part 3 to receive treatment with elenestinib in an open-label fashion following completion of the earlier Part. Part K will enroll participants with ISM who have previously received an approved selective KIT inhibitor. The study also includes pharmacokinetic (PK) groups that will enroll participants with ISM.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
534
Elenestinib oral tablet
Placebo oral tablet
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
RECRUITINGStanford Cancer Institute
Palo Alto, California, United States
RECRUITINGUCHealth Blood Disorders and Cell Therapies Center - Anschutz Medical Campus
Aurora, Colorado, United States
RECRUITINGBrigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Part 1: Number of participants with Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Part 1: Mean change from baseline in ISM-Symptom in Assessment Form (ISM-SAF) Total Symptom Score (TSS)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 13
Part 2: Mean change from baseline in ISM-SAF TSS
Time frame: Baseline, Week 49
Part 3: Number of participants with Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Part 3: Change from baseline in ISM-SAF TSS
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Part 1: Change from baseline in serum tryptase
Time frame: Baseline, Week 13
Part 1: Change from baseline in KIT D816V allele fraction in blood
Time frame: Baseline, Week 13
Part 1: Change from baseline in Bone Marrow (BM) mast cells
Time frame: Baseline, Week 13
Part 1: Mean change from baseline in ISM-SAF individual symptom scores
Time frame: Baseline, Week 13
Part 1: Time to achieve 30% reduction from baseline in ISM-SAF TSS
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 13
Part 1: Time to achieve 30% reduction from baseline in ISM-SAF domain scores
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 13
Part 2: Proportion of participants achieving normalized tryptase
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 49
Part 2: Proportion of participants who achieve an undetectable level or at least a 50% reduction in KIT D816V Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 49
Part 2: Proportion of participants achieving symptom control as defined by achieving mild symptoms
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 49
Part 2: Mean percent change from baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 49
Part 2: Mean change from baseline in the annualized rate of anaphylaxis events
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 25 to 48
Part 2: Mean change from baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) scores
Time frame: Baseline, Week 49
Part 2: Mean change from baseline in ISM-SAF domain scores
Time frame: Baseline, Week 49
Part 2: Number of participants with AEs
Time frame: Up to Week 49
Part 2: Proportion of participants with a 50% reduction in ISM-SAF TSS
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
Part 2: Proportion of participants with a 50% reduction in ISM-SAF domain scores
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
Part 2: Proportion of participants with a 30% reduction in ISM-SAF TSS
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
Part 2: Proportion of participants with a 30% reduction in ISM-SAF domain scores
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
Part 3: Proportion of participants achieving symptom control as defined by achieving mild symptoms
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Part 3: Change from baseline in ISM-SAF domain scores
Time frame: Baseline, up to 5 years
Part 3: Proportion of participants achieving a normalized tryptase
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Part 3: Change from baseline in BMD
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Part 3: Change from baseline in the annualized rate of anaphylaxis events
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Parts 2 and 3: Change from baseline in serum tryptase
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Parts 2 and 3: Change from baseline in KIT D816V allele fraction in blood
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Parts 2 and 3: Change from baseline in Bone Marrow (BM) mast cells
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Parts 2 and 3: Proportion of participants achieving controlled disease
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Parts 2 and 3: Change from baseline in skin lesions as assessed by the fractional body surface area of the most affected skin area
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Parts 2 and 3: Change from baseline in the number of concomitant medications identified as SDT
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Parts 2 and 3: Change from baseline in ISM-SAF Individual Symptom Scores
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Parts 2 and 3: Change from baseline in ISM-SAF Lead (most severe) Symptom Score
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Parts 2 and 3: Change from baseline in QoL scores
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Part S: Number of participants with AEs
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Part S: Proportion of participants who achieve a Pure Pathologic Response (PPR)
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Part S: Mean change from baseline in ISM-SAF
Time frame: Baseline, Week 25
Part K: Number of participants with AEs
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Part K: Change from baseline in serum tryptase
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Part K: Change from baseline in KIT D816V allele fraction in blood
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Part K: Mean change from baseline in ISM-SAF TSS
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Part K: Change from baseline in QoL scores
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Michigan Medicine University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
RECRUITINGMayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
RECRUITINGRoswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, United States
RECRUITINGColumbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
RECRUITINGThe University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
RECRUITING...and 44 more locations