Midline Failures: A Comparison Between a Hydrophilic Biomaterial and Thermoplastic Polyurethane

N/ACompletedNCT04911842

Access Vascular Inc205 enrolled

Overview

Retrospective chart review to evaluate and compare the rate of failures between midlines made from different materials

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Enrollment

205

Conditions

Midline Catheter

Interventions

HydroMIDDEVICE

Hydrophilic biomaterial

TPUDEVICE

Thermoplastic polyurethane

Eligibility

Sex: ALL

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Subjects who have been inserted with the HydroMID by the vascular access group * Subjects who have been inserted with a competitor 4 Fr single lumen by the vascular access team Exclusion Criteria: * Any off-label use (PICC lines cut to be midlines for any manufacturer)

Locations (1)

Joseph Bunch

Romeoville, Illinois, United States

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The primary objective of this chart review is to evaluate the rates of failure of midlines made from different materials.

Time frame: retrospective review- March 2021 through May 2021

Secondary Outcomes

To compare the proportion of times the midline was used to successfully complete prescribed length.

Time frame: retrospective review- March 2021 through May 2021

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.