Objective: This study's primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of mechanical ventilation with high vs. low tidal volume (Vt) in people with acute spinal cord injury (SCI). Secondary objectives include a comparison of inflammatory markers between these groups. Study Design: Randomized comparative effectiveness trial Methods: Study population: Adults with acute traumatic SCI on mechanical ventilation (MV). Subjects will be randomized to receive either a lower Vt of 8-10 cc/kg predicted body weight (pbw) or a high Vt of 14-16 ml/kg pbw. Risks and potential Benefits: Risks of study interventions are similar to usual care as proposed tidal volume settings are within the current usual care range. However, people assigned to the lower tidal volume group may have a lower risk of pneumonia and respiratory complications.
Background: Respiratory complications associated with mechanical ventilation (MV) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality following acute spinal cord injury (SCI). Emerging evidence suggests pneumonia is also associated with reduced neurologic recovery. Therefore, pneumonia prevention is of primary importance to improve outcomes. In the non-SCI population, MV with lower tidal volume (Vt) has been shown to reduce inflammation and rates of pneumonia. High Vt MV results in disruption of pulmonary endothelium and release of inflammatory mediators, which play a role in the development of pulmonary complications. In contrast, guidelines for SCI practitioners recommend MV with higher Vt without strong evidence. Objective: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized control trial comparing MV with high vs. low Vt. Secondary objectives include a comparison of clinical outcomes and inflammatory mediators between these groups. Methods: Study population: Adults with acute traumatic SCI admitted to an acute inpatient rehabilitation facility on MV. Subjects will be randomized to receive either a lower Vt of 8-10 cc/kg predicted body weight (pbw) or a high Vt of 14-16 ml/kg pbw. Study participants will be randomly assigned to high tidal volume (14-16 ml/kg pbw) or low tidal volume of 8 to 10 ml/kg pbw within 48 hrs of admission, stratified based on vital capacity at admission to ensure equal allocation of those with most severe respiratory impairment and unlikely to wean from the vent. Importance of knowledge gained from the study: Investigators believe the completion of this study will add to the fund of knowledge of respiratory management of people with SCI, especially at the early stages of the injury, including reducing respiratory complications in people with SCI who are at very high risk of severe respiratory complications which is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in this population.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
31
A high tidal volume (14-16 ml/kg pbw) with positive end-expiratory pressure will be applied during mechanical ventilation.
A low tidal volume (8-10 ml/kg pbw) with positive end-expiratory pressure will be applied during mechanical ventilation.
Craig Hospital
Englewood, Colorado, United States
TIRR Memorial Hermann
Houston, Texas, United States
Number of Episodes of Pneumonia
The primary outcome is pneumonia episodes with evidence of new or progressive and persistent infiltrate on chest radiograph plus 2 of the following abnormal white blood cell count, presence of fever or hyperthermia, purulent sputum, and deterioration in gas exchange. Any new pneumonia episodes which meet the above criteria and developed 48 hours after achieving target tidal volume will be recorded.
Time frame: From the time of enrollment to time of discharge from hospital (about 6 weeks)
Feasibility as Assessed by Recruitment Rate
Recruitment rate is the proportion of eligible people who provide consent.
Time frame: At the time of consent (within 48 hours of hospital admission)
Feasibility as Assessed by Adherence Rate
Adherence rate is the proportion of participants in each group who receive the assigned intervention per protocol.
Time frame: At the time of start of intervention (within 48 hours of hospital admission)
Feasibility as Assessed by Retention Rate
Retention rate is the number of participants in each group who complete all study procedures.
Time frame: at the time of discharge from hospital (about 6 weeks after admission)
Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants With Missing Data
Time frame: From the time of enrollment to time of discharge from hospital (about 6 weeks)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.