Multi-center, prospective, non-randomized study to evaluate Symphony™ Posterior Cervical System in the setting of surgical treatment of adult cervical deformity.
Specific Aims: * Evaluate outcomes for operative treatment of adult cervical deformity patients treated with posterior spinal fusion using SymphonyTM posterior cervical system at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 year follow up. Outcome metrics will include standardized patient reported outcome measures, radiographic analysis of deformity correction and spinal alignment. * Evaluate rates and risk factors for perioperative complications and need for revision surgery at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. * Develop and validate a surgical invasiveness index for cervical deformity surgical procedures * Validate the cervical deformity frailty index previously developed by the ISSG and further optimize this index * Establish adult cervical deformity specific thresholds for minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for standard outcomes measures using a patient satisfaction anchor * Develop a series of predictive models for adult cervical deformity surgery, including outcomes (e.g. overall change and achievement of MCID), occurrence of complications, and radiographic changes * Assess the psychological impact of adult cervical deformity, how psychological measures change following surgical treatment, and whether there are correlations between baseline psychological factors and outcomes following surgery * Assess baseline functional measures (e.g. grip strength) for adult cervical deformity patients presenting for surgery, assess how these functional measures change following surgery, and assess whether there are correlations between baseline functional measures and likelihood to improve following surgery * Assess baseline narcotic use among adult cervical deformity patients presenting for surgery * Assess changes in narcotic use from baseline to follow-up intervals after surgical treatment for adult cervical deformity * Assess for correlations between narcotic use (baseline and follow-up) and outcomes following surgical treatment for adult cervical deformity * Assess the impact of osteopenia and osteoporosis on patient frailty, complications, and maintenance of deformity correction * Define clinical and demographic features of the population afflicted with cervical deformity (e.g., age, gender, comorbidities, disability, health-related quality of life) * Assess for correlations between radiographic parameters and degree of disability/pain at baseline * Assess and describe surgical strategies used to address cervical deformity * Define complications and rates of complications (perioperative and delayed) associated with the surgical treatment of cervical deformity * Assess the role/need for pre/post operative tracheostomy and PEG * Evaluate and compare radiographic changes of sagittal spinal alignment (focal, regional, and global) and pelvic parameters pre and post cervical deformity surgery. * Develop predictive formulas of post-operative alignments based on surgical techniques employed for correction * Identify risk factors related to poor clinical outcomes * Define potential impact of complications on clinical/radiographic outcomes * Determine reoperation rates over two-year follow-up period * Assess change in subaxial alignment after occiput to C2 fusion * Assess the effect of C1-2 lordosis and C1-2 fusion on subaxial alignment and outcome * Assess outcomes of long fusions involving the occiput related to head center of gravity and regional and global balance * Assess outcomes of occipital-cervical-thoracic fusion on cervical alignment and global alignment * Evaluate clinical outcomes (short- and long-term) following cervical deformity surgery * Assess cost-effectiveness of adult cervical deformity surgery * Correlate different measures of frailty, including Edmonton, CHSA, and ISSG.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
100
Surgical intervention will be patient specified by treating surgeon.
University of California Davis
Sacramento, California, United States
Denver International Spine Center, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children and Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center
Denver, Colorado, United States
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Headaches
Self reported pain in Head where 0=no pain/10=severe pain
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Neck
Self-reported pain in Neck where 0=no pain/10=severe pain
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Upper extremity
Self-reported pain in Arms where 0=no pain/10=severe pain
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Lower extremity
Self-reported pain in Legs where 0=no pain/10=severe pain
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Back
Self-reported pain in Back where 0=no pain/10=severe pain
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Patient reported neck disability tool
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12)
Patient reported outcome
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Anxiety
Computer adaptive PROs
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Depression
Computer adaptive PROs
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Pain Interference
Computer adaptive PROs
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Physical Function
Computer adaptive PROs
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Social Satisfaction (Role)
Computer adaptive PROs
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Social Satisfaction (DSA)
Computer adaptive PROs
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
Spine Radiographs
Radiographic parameters (Cervical lordosis, Kyphosis, Scoliosis; Global balance in coronal and sagittal planes of the spine; pelvic parameters (pelvic incidence, tilt, slope) and bony fusion status
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale (mJOA)
Patient reported outcome measuring functional status using scale of 0 to 18. The higher the score, the less disability.
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
EAT-10
Measures swallowing difficulties as reported by the patient.
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10)
Measures voice handicap as reported by the patient.
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
Adverse events
Any adverse events that occur during study participation \& meeting study established reporting criteria
Time frame: 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years
Edmonton Frail Scale
Frailty scale from 0 to 17 where the higher the score the more frail the patient
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
CHSA Frail Scale
Clinical Frailty Scale from 1 to 9 where the higher the score, the more frail the patient
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up
Dynamometer Hand Grip Strength test
With patient seated, patient will squeeze the dynamometer as hard as he/she can with each hand.
Time frame: Change from Preop to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 & 2 year follow-up