Postoperative function and patient satisfaction are becoming increasingly relevant in patients after knee arthroplasty surgery. Despite adequate preoperative planning, improved surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols, only 75%-85% of patients seems satisfied after TKA procedurs. Implant positioning and component alignment are determining factors in patient outcome. Currently, different alignment strategies in TKA surgery are used such as Mechanical Alignment (MA) and Kinematical Alignment (KA). Recently, a new and individualized alignment strategy (inverse Kinematic Alignment/iKA) was introduced. Preliminary 1-year results of iKA are promising, however, clinical and functional outcome on the medium and longterm should be investigated. This project aims to compare patients with iKA TKA with MA TKA on clinical, functional and biomechanical outcomes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
80
Robotically Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty with a particular alignment strategy
AZDelta
Roeselare, Belgium
Gait Analysis - walking speed - faster is better
Spatio Temporal Parameters are captured with infra-red camera during gait: velocity
Time frame: 2 year
Performance Testing - step-up step-down speed - faster is better
Spatio Temporal Parameters are captured with infra-red camera during functional movements: velocity
Time frame: 2 year
Patient Reported Outcome Measures - Oxford Knee Score (OKS): maximum score (best) is 48/48; worst score is 0/48
Questionnaire - Oxford Knee Score
Time frame: baseline - 1 year - 2 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.