Comparison Between the Analgesic Effectiveness of Virtual Reality and Topical Anesthesia: A Clinical Study

Overview

A split-mouth, controlled trial aimed to clinically compare and evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality versus topical anesthesia gel prior to administration of dental anesthesia injection in reducing the perceived pain and anxiety level in adult patients and to find out their preferred procedure. Heart rate before and after the end of the procedure will be identified, pain intensity of the injection will be identified using a scale, and finally patients' preference will be identified using a questionnaire.

Steps of the Experiment Step I: before the administration of the local anesthesia injection, heart rate will be measured for the patients using an FDA Approved pulse oximeter (Santa Medical SM-165 Finger Pulse Oximeter). Findings will be recorded. Step II: at the first appointment, patients will be randomly allocated to receive the injection of the local anesthesia either with topical anesthetic gel or with virtual reality in one side of the jaw. Step III: immediately after dental anesthesia injection procedure, the patient will be asked to rate the level of perceived pain, using Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale (WBFPS). Step IV: after the administration of the local anesthesia injection, heart rate will be measured for the patients an FDA Approved pulse oximeter (Santa Medical SM-165 Finger Pulse Oximeter). Findings will be recorded. Step V: in the next appointment, the other technique (virtual reality or topical anesthetic gel) will be used on the contralateral side for the same patients. So each patient will receive local anesthesia injection twice, one with topical anesthetic gel and one else with VR in the contralateral side. Step VI: after completion of both procedures, each patient will be asked to state his/her preference for the delivery system of future injections to be recorded.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes