The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the study drugs, lenacapavir (LEN) in preventing HIV infection, in participants ≥ 16 years of age who have condomless receptive anal sex with partners assigned male at birth and are at risk for HIV-1 infection. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of LEN for HIV-1 PrEP in participants ≥ 16 years of age who have condomless receptive anal sex with partners assigned male at birth at risk of HIV-1 infection.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
3,292
Tablets administered orally without regard to food
Tablets administered orally
Administered via SC injections
Incidence Phase: Recent Infection Testing Algorithm (RITA) Estimate of the Background Human Immunodeficiency-1 Virus Infection Incidence Rate (bHIV) Per 100 Person Years (PY)
bHIV per 100 PY in the Incidence Phase was calculated using RITA. The RITA incorporated HIV-1 testing results and recency assay testing results to estimate the bHIV. Recency assay testing was performed for participants in the All Screened Set found to have HIV-1 infection at the Incidence Phase Screening Visit as defined below. Participants were considered to have recent HIV-1 infection if the normalized optical density (ODn) was below 1.5 threshold using the Sedia limiting antigen avidity enzyme immunoassay (LAg-EIA) and the HIV-1 RNA (viral load) was \> 75 copies/mL of blood. HIV-1 infection was defined as participants having at least one of the following central lab results at the Incidence Phase screening visit: * Positive HIV-1/2 differentiation Ab, OR * Positive HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) qualitative test, OR * HIV-1 RNA quantitative test ≥200 copies/mL.
Time frame: Incidence Phase Screening Visit (Day 1)
Randomized Blinded Phase: HIV-1 Incidence Reported Per 100 PY for LEN Compared to Background HIV (bHIV, Participants in All Screened Set)
HIV-1 incidence per 100 PY for LEN was calculated as the number of participants who acquired HIV-1 divided by the total of a) for participants not diagnosed with HIV-1, sum of all duration of follow-up time in years, while at risk of HIV-1 infection (where a year is 365.25 days) and b) for participants diagnosed with HIV-1, sum of all duration of follow-up time up to confirmed HIV-1 diagnoses. HIV-1 diagnosis was determined by an HIV adjudication committee who reviewed potential HIV-1 infection events in the randomized participants. The committee, in a blinded, consistent, and unbiased manner, determined whether HIV test results confirmed HIV-1 infection and determined the date of diagnosis for each case, defined as the date of the earliest study visit with evidence of HIV infection considering both prospective HIV testing and back-testing of archived samples. bHIV incidence per 100 PY in All Screened Set was estimated as described in outcome measure#1.
Time frame: Up to 149 weeks
Randomized Blinded Phase: HIV-1 Incidence Reported Per 100 PY for LEN Compared to F/TDF
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Administered via SC injections
Tablets administered orally
Tablets administered orally
F/TAF tablets administered orally once daily
UAB Sexual Health Research Clinic
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Loma Linda University Clinical Trial Center Clinic
Loma Linda, California, United States
Ruane Clinical Research Group Inc.
Los Angeles, California, United States
UCLA CBAM Vine Street Clinic
Los Angeles, California, United States
Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (CDU) - Clinical Translational Research Center (CTRC)
Los Angeles, California, United States
Mills Clinical Research
Los Angeles, California, United States
The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
BIOS Clinical Research
Palm Springs, California, United States
UCSD Anti Viral Research Center
San Diego, California, United States
Bridge HIV at the San Francisco Department of Public Health
San Francisco, California, United States
...and 83 more locations
HIV-1 incidence per 100 PY was calculated as the number of participants who acquired HIV-1 divided by the total of a) for participants not diagnosed with HIV-1, sum of all duration of follow-up time in years, while at risk of HIV-1 infection (where a year is 365.25 days) and b) for participants diagnosed with HIV-1, sum of all duration of follow-up time up to confirmed HIV-1 diagnoses. HIV-1 diagnosis was determined by an HIV adjudication committee who reviewed potential HIV-1 infection events in the randomized participants. The committee, in a blinded, consistent, and unbiased manner, determined whether HIV test results confirmed HIV-1 infection and determined the date of diagnosis for each case, defined as the date of the earliest study visit with evidence of HIV infection considering both prospective HIV testing and back-testing of archived samples.
Time frame: Up to 149 weeks
Randomized Blinded Phase: HIV-1 Incidence Among Participants Adherent to LEN
A participant was defined as adherent to LEN if they have received all per-protocol administrations of LEN within 28 weeks since the previous administration. The incidence of HIV-1 infection per 100 PY calculation is defined in outcome measure #2.
Time frame: Up to 149 weeks
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAEs were defined as 1 or both of the following: Any adverse events (AEs) leading to premature discontinuation of study drug, or Any AEs with an onset date on or after the study drug start date and no later than the last exposure date after permanent discontinuation of the study drug. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a study drug that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities
Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were defined as values that increased at least 1 toxicity grade from baseline at any post-baseline visit, up to and including the last exposure date for participants who permanently discontinued study drug, or the last available date in the database snapshot for participants who were still on treatment at the time of an analysis.
Time frame: Up to 4 years