This study will assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide plus ADT versus placebo plus enzalutamide plus ADT in Chinese participants with mHSPC. The primary hypothesis is that in participants with mHSPC, the combination of pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide plus ADT is superior to placebo plus enzalutamide plus ADT with respect to 1) radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) per Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG)-modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) and 2) overall survival (OS). As of Amendment 4, the study is being stopped for futility. All the prespecified interim analysis after interim analysis (IA1) and final analysis of the study described the statistical analysis plan (SAP) will not be performed. Safety analysis will be performed at the end of the study; there will be no further analyses for efficacy and electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) endpoints collected from participants beyond the IA1 cutoff date. All study participants will stop ongoing treatment with pembrolizumab/placebo. Exceptions may be requested for study participants who, in the assessment of their study physician, are benefitting from the combination of enzalutamide and pembrolizumab, after consulting with the Sponsor. All other study participants should be discontinued from study and be offered standard of care (SOC) treatment as deemed necessary by the Investigator. If enzalutamide as SOC is not accessible off study to the participant, central sourcing may continue. As of Amendment 04, disease progression will no longer be centrally verified, participants will only be assessed locally. As of Amendment 4, Second Course treatment is not an option for participants. There are currently no participants in the Second Course Phase.
The China extension study will include participants previously enrolled in China in the global study for MK-3475-991 (NCT04191096) plus those enrolled during the China extension enrollment period. A total of approximately 186 Chinese participants will be enrolled.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
186
Pembrolizumab is administered as an IV infusion at 200 mg on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for up to 35 cycles.
Enzalutamide is administered orally as capsules/tablets at a dosage of 160 mg daily. Enzalutamide is administered continuously until criteria for discontinuation are met.
Stable regimen of ADT (LHRH agonist or antagonist) at a dose and frequency of administration that is consistent with the local product label.
Placebo infusion solution is administered as an IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for up to 35 cycles.
Peking University First Hospital ( Site 0800)
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Beijing Cancer Hospital ( Site 0802)
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Chongqing Cancer Hospital ( Site 0815)
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University (Site 0816)
Xiamen, Fujian, China
Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center ( Site 0825)
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) Per Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG)-Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)
rPFS was defined as the time from randomization to occurrence of: radiological tumor progression using RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR; progression of bone lesions using PCWG criteria; or death due to any cause. Progression as per modified RECIST 1.1 was ≥20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions and progression of existing non-target lesions. Progression of bone lesions by PCWG criteria was the appearance of ≥2 new bone lesions on bone scan, that have been confirmed to not represent tumor flare, and was persistent for ≥6 weeks. The rPFS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Participants without a rPFS event were censored at the date of last disease assessment.
Time frame: Up to approximately 17 months
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. The OS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Participants without documented death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up.
Time frame: Up to approximately 17 months
Time to Initiation of the First Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapy or Death (TFST)
TFST was defined as the time from randomization to initiation of the first subsequent anti-cancer therapy or death; whichever occurred first. The TFST was calculated using the product limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Participants without documented event at time of analysis will be censored at the date of last known time to have not received subsequent new anti-cancer therapy.
Time frame: Up to Approximately 17 months
Time to First Symptomatic Skeletal-related Event (TTSSRE)
TTSSRE was the time from randomization to the first symptomatic skeletal-related event defined as: use of external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to prevent or relieve skeletal symptoms, occurrence of new symptomatic pathologic bone fracture (vertebral or nonvertebral), occurrence of spinal cord compression, or tumor-related orthopedic surgical intervention, whichever occurs first. The TTSSRE was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method for censored data. Participants without symptomatic skeletal-related events were censored at the last evaluable assessment.
Time frame: Up to Approximately 17 months
Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression
Time to PSA progression was the time from randomization to PSA progression. The PSA progression date was defined as the date of 1) ≥25% increase and ≥2 ng/mL above the nadir, confirmed by a second value ≥3 weeks later if there is PSA decline from baseline, or 2) ≥25% increase and ≥2 ng/mL increase from baseline beyond 12 weeks if there is no PSA decline from baseline. Time to PSA was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method for censored data. Participants without PSA progression were censored at the last PSA date.
Time frame: Up to Approximately 17 months
Time to Radiographic Soft Tissue Progression Per Soft Tissue Rules of PCWG-Modified RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR
The time to radiographic soft tissue progression was defined as the time from randomization to radiographic soft tissue progression per soft tissue rules of PCWG-modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR. Progression was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Time to radiographic soft tissue progression was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Participants without radiographic soft tissue progression were censored at the last evaluable assessment.
Time frame: Up to Approximately 17 months
Time to Pain Progression (TTPP) as Assessed by Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) Item #3 ("Worst Pain in 24 Hours") and Opiate Use
TTPP was defined as the time from randomization to pain progression as determined by Item 3 of the BPI-SF. Pain progression was defined as: 1) For participants asymptomatic at baseline: a \>2-point change from baseline in the average BPI-SF item 3 score at 2 consecutive visits or initiation of opioid use for pain 2) For participants symptomatic at baseline (average BPI-SF Item 3 score \>0 and/or currently taking opioids; a \>2-point change from baseline in the average BPI-SF Item 3 score and the average worst pain score \>4 and no decrease in average opioid use. TTPP was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method for censored data. Participants who had \> 2 consecutive visits that were not evaluable for pain progression were censored at the last evaluable assessment.
Time frame: Up to Approximately 17 months
Time From Randomization to Disease Progression as Determined by Investigator Assessment After Next-line of Therapy or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurs First (PFS2)
PFS2 was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression as determined by investigator assessment of radiological or clinical progression after next-line of therapy or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: Up to Approximately 17 months
Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate
PSA response rate was the percentage of participants who had PSA response defined as a reduction in the PSA level from baseline by \>50%. The reduction in PSA level was confirmed by an additional PSA evaluation performed \>3 weeks from the original response.
Time frame: Up to Approximately 17 Months
Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Undetectable
PSA undetectable rate was defined as the percentage of participants with detectable PSA (\> 0.2 ng/mL) at baseline, which becomes undetectable (\< 0.2 ng/mL) during study treatment.
Time frame: Up to Approximately 17 Months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per PCWG-Modified RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions per RECIST 1.1; and no evidence of disease (NED) on base scan per PCWG) or partial response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions per RECIST 1.1; and non-progressive disease, non-evaluable \[NE\], or NED on bone scan or CR with non-progressive disease or NE bone scan per PCWG).
Time frame: Up to Approximately 17 Months
Duration of Response (DOR) Per PCWG- Modified RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR
DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per PCWG and RECIST 1.1 criteria until progressive disease (PD) or death. PD per RECIST 1.1 was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of a least 5 mm. PD per PCWG was the appearance of \>2 new bone lesions on bone scan, that have been confirmed to not represent tumor flare, and were persistent for \>6 weeks. The DOR was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to Approximately 17 Months
Number of Participants Who Experience an Adverse Event (AE)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE could therefore have been any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. Participants who experienced an AE will be reported for each arm.
Time frame: Up to Approximately 17 Months
Number of Participants Who Discontinue Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The number of participants who discontinue study treatment due to an AE will be reported for each arm.
Time frame: Up to Approximately 17 Months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University-Urology ( Site 0638)
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Sun Yat Sen Memorial Hospital (Site # 0819)
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital ( Site 0838)
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital ( Site 0822)
Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
Henan Cancer Hospital ( Site 0818)
Zhengzhou, Henan, China
...and 14 more locations