Endometriosis is the most common reproductive disease afflicting young women, often leading to debilitating chronic pelvic pain and impaired quality of life. Safe, effective, and convenient long-term treatments are lacking for adolescents and young adults. The levonorgestrel-containing IUD (LNG-IUD) represents an attractive long-term drug delivery system for the treatment of endometriosis during adolescence and young adulthood. However, while the LNG-IUD has an acceptable safety profile, it is not associated with a favorable bleeding profile and may not fully suppress endometriosis pain when used as monotherapy. Investigators hypothesize that the addition of NETA will improve bleeding patterns, maximize pain control, and improve continuation rates of the IUD when the two medications are used in combination. This proposed prospective trial provides the ideal context in which to investigate these clinical questions and advance research on the best treatments for endometriosis.
Endometriosis is a major source of morbidity for U.S. females, affecting \~49% of adolescents with chronic pelvic pain and 10% of all women of reproductive age. This percentage translates into approximately 176 million women worldwide who may suffer from endometriosis. Annual health care costs are estimated to be over $22 billion in the US alone. Over 50% of adults with endometriosis report onset of severe pelvic pain during their adolescence. Symptoms result in decreased quality of life, negative socioeconomic consequences, impaired reproductive potential, and diminished mental health. Endometriosis is a chronic disease that progresses over time in more than half of patients. Endometriosis has no cure. For adolescents in particular, this means that the impact of endometriosis and its symptoms can last for decades. Appropriate management involves not only prompt initiation of therapy, but also the maintenance of therapy for a protracted length of time. Medical therapy for endometriosis typically includes oral progestins or contraceptive pills. Though often effective, these options are associated with systemic side-effects which may further affect compliance and preclude long-term use. Furthermore, the need for repeated or regular administration compromises compliance and therefore efficacy. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUD) has been evaluated as a promising treatment for endometriosis in adult women. The LNG-IUD 52 mg (Mirena) delivers levonorgestrel (LNG) to the uterine cavity at a steady rate of 20 µg/day over 5 to 6 years. The LNG causes atrophy and pseudo decidualization of the uterine lining, along with apoptosis of endometrial glands and stroma. As the LNG-IUD requires no further patient action following insertion, patient compliance is excellent. While continuation of the device is generally very good in adults, unfavorable uterine bleeding patterns are the most frequent reason for early device removal, particularly within the first 6 months. Anecdotal clinical experience suggests that combining use of the LNG-IUD with low-dose oral progestin therapy may maximize effectiveness and continuation of the LNG-IUD device in adolescents. The investigators will recruit 80 adolescents for participation in a double-blind, randomized trial of NETA (n=40) vs. placebo (control group, n=40) for adjunct treatment to the levonorgestrel-containing IUD for pelvic pain due to endometriosis. It is believed that a combination of the locally-acting LNG-IUD plus systemic NETA may be the optimal combination to effectively treat endometriosis pain, minimize side effects, provide contraception, and control bleeding for adolescents with endometriosis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
5mg of the NETA capsule by mouth daily for 12 months
Placebo capsule everyday for 12 months
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Change in Pain-Physical functioning assessed by the BPI
A 7-item self-report measure. The items in this scale can be grouped into those that assess physical functioning (general activity; walking ability; normal work, including both work outside the home and housework), those that assess emotional functioning (mood; relations with people; enjoyment of life), and a single item that assesses the extent to which pain interferes with sleep. Either the item asking about the "worst pain" or the arithmetic mean of the four severity items can be used as measures of pain severity; the arithmetic mean of the seven interference items can be used as a measure of pain interference. The BPI is anchored between a scale of zero (no pain/interference) to ten (maximum pain/interference). The magnitude of treatment-associated change in BPI Interference Scale scores in open-label and randomized clinical trials ranges from 1 to 3 points, depending on the specific pain conditions and treatments studied.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months, 12 Months
Change in pain severity measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
VAS: A measurement of pain intensity, assessed by a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, to rate maximum and average pain intensity over the preceding 7 days. Higher scores indicate more severe pain intensity.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months, 12 Months
Change in pain measured by Biberoglu and Behrman patient ratings scale (B&B pain scale)
Biberoglu and Behrman patient ratings scale (B\&B pain scale): Survey that assesses dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, and noncyclic pelvic pain. Each is graded on a scale from 0 to 3, with higher numbers indicating more severe symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months, 12 Months
Change in Emotional functioning, assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI)
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI)130, a 21-item self-report instrument that provides a rapid assessment of depressive symptoms.Total scores on the BDI range from 0 to 63. Scores below 10 should be considered to reflect "minimal or no" depression, with score ranges of 10 to 18, 19 to 29, and 30 to 63 reflect "mild to moderate," "moderate to severe," and "severe" depression, respectively.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months, 12 Months
Change in Participant ratings of overall improvement, assessed by the Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC)
This single-item self-assessed rating uses a 7-point rating scale with the options "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," and "very much worse."
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months, 12 Months
Change in high sensitivity C-reactive protein
investigators will measure changes in high sensitivity C-reactive protein (mg/L) over time to determine whether norethindrone acetate impacts inflammatory markers.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in interleukin-8
Investigators will measure changes in interleukin-8 (pg/mL) over time to determine whether norethindrone acetate impacts inflammatory markers.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in tumor necrosis factor alpha
Investigators will measure tumor necrosis factor alpha (pg/mL) to determine whether norethindrone acetate impacts inflammatory markers.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI)
Investigators will measure changes in TFPI to determine whether norethindrone acetate impacts prothrombotic markers.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in von Willebrand factor antigen
Investigators will measure changes in von Willebrand factor antigen to determine whether norethindrone acetate impacts prothrombotic markers (VWFpp) to VWF antigen (VWF:Ag).
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in Factor VIII activity
Investigators will measure changes in Factor VIII activity (1 U/mL) to determine whether norethindrone acetate impacts prothrombotic markers.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in soluble P-selectin
Investigators will measure changes in soluble P- selectin (unit) over time to determine whether norethindrone acetate impacts prothrombotic markers.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Investigators will measure changes in interleukin-6 (pg/mL) over time to determine whether norethindrone acetate impacts prothrombotic markers.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in lipoprotein[a]
Investigators will measure changes in lipoprotein\[a\] (mg/dL) over time to determine whether norethindrone acetate impacts prothrombotic markers.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in Measure of arterial stiffness by pulse wave velocity
Pulse wave velocity is an ultrasound measurement of the rate at which pressure waves move down a blood vessel. It is collected by using two pressure monitors placed a known distance from one another, the "Pulse Wave Distance". Pulse wave velocity is a validated surrogate measure of arterial stiffness that is a novel biomarker for cardiovascular risk/dysfunction.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 months
Change in Bone mineral density Z-scores by dual energy Xray absorptiometry (DXA)
DXA has been the most widely used tool for the assessment of bone mass in clinical practice. DXA measures bone in two dimensions, and allows for the calculation of aBMD. Although these measures do not capture the internal architecture of bone, they are highly correlated with bone strength. A DXA scan of the total body (less head), lumbar spine, and total hip will be obtained. Age-, race-, and gender-specific Z-scores will be calculated using appropriate reference software.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in measures of central hypersensitization measured by quantitative sensory testing.
The Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a standard method through which sensory nerve function is quantitatively measured, based on responses of the participant. It will be measured at the abdomen, as well as the arm, which serves as an internal control.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months