Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategy has been used in the patient management of different diseases. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ERAS in the perioperative period of posterior approach of cervical spine operation among patients with CSM.
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategy has been used in the patient management of different diseases, but up to now, few effort has been done to evaluate the effectiveness of ERAS in patients perioperative management of cervical spine surgery. As a interdisciplinary cooperation system, either qualitative or quantitative method alone can not completely reflect the function of ERAS. Mixed model research (MMR) is a appropriate method to evaluate a complex system, but it has not been used in ERAS evaluation. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ERAS in the perioperative period of posterior approach of cervical spine operation among patients with CSM using MMR, including the retrospective quantitative part and prospective qualitative part. In the retrospective part, we will collect the data of length of stay, VAS scores, mJOA scores and SF-36 scores to compare the difference between ERAS group and regular group. In the prospective part, we will collect the data from the focus group meetings and personal interviews of patients, to verify that ERAS has the ability to improve the postoperative outcomes, while maintain an equal surgical effect.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
204
ERAS management includes 3 parts: (1) Preoperative analgesia and airway evaluation. (2) The protection and reconstruction of the musculo-ligamentous complex during the surgery, the safe intubation, and the local infiltration anesthesia during surgery. (3) Collar free, multimodal analgesia, airway management, and early recovery after surgery.
Feifei Zhou
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Outcomes of pain
Visual analogue scale before after surgery, 0 to 10 points, higher means severer the pain is.
Time frame: Preoperation
Outcomes of pain
Visual analogue scale 3-month after surgery, 0 to 10 points, higher means severer the pain is.
Time frame: 3 months after surgery.
Length of stay
Length of stay
Time frame: Admission to discharge, an average of 3 days
Neurological function
Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score before surgery, -2 to 17 points, higher means better outcome.
Time frame: Preoperation
Neurological function
Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score 3-month after surgery, -2 to 17 points, higher means better outcome.
Time frame: 3 months after surgery.
Outcomes of quality of life
36-Item Short Form Survey score before surgery, 0 to 100 points, higher means better outcome.
Time frame: Preoperation
Outcomes of quality of life
36-Item Short Form Survey score 3-month after surgery, 0 to 100 points, higher means better outcome.
Time frame: 3 months after surgery
Focus group meetings
Focus group meetings by specialists, to discuss the effect of ERAS and the what improvements can be made.
Time frame: Admission to discharge, an average of 3 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Personal interviews
Personal interviews of patients at 3-month follow-up
Time frame: At 3-month follow-up