Treatment of Mild and Moderate Cases of Gynaecomastia

Sohag University40 enrolled

Overview

This study aims to compare liposuction and periareolar surgical excision in mild and moderate cases of gynecomastia as regard cosmosis, complications, patient satisfaction, operation time, and hospital stay. This study will be carried out on patients with gynecomastia presented to the Plastic Surgery Department, Sohag University, in the period between January 2021 to January 2022 as a retrospective and prospective study. Patients will be divided into 2 groups: group A treated with suction-assisted liposuction. group B treated with peri-areolar surgical excision. Each group contains 20 patients.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Gynecomastia

Interventions

liposuctionPROCEDURE

suction-assisted liposuction

surgical excisionPROCEDURE

periareolar surgical excision

Eligibility

Sex: MALEMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 60 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: \- The age of patients ranges from 18-60yrs. Mild and moderate cases of gynecomastia. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with endocrine causes. Patients with genetic causes. Severe cases of gynecomastia. Patients who refused surgical intervention. Patients who are not fit for surgery. Patients with chronic illness.

Locations (1)

Sohag University

Sohag, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Difference between group A and B in aesthetic satisfaction

A 100 -point visual analogue scale (VAS) for the assessment of aesthetic satisfaction with 0 as the worst cosmosis and 100 as the best aesthetic result With filled standardized charts.

Time frame: difference between group A and B in aesthetic results according to visual analogue scale at 3 month post-operative

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.