The recommended treatment for insomnia, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), is effective. However, its long, multi-component nature makes it challenging to implement in ordinary primary care, where most people are treated. An important component of CBT-I is sleep restriction therapy, which may be comparatively easy to carry out in routine primary care. This project tests whether a brief nurse-led group intervention in primary care based on sleep restriction therapy for insomnia reduces insomnia severity and is cost-effective.
Background: Insomnia is typically treated in primary health care. The most common treatment is hypnotic drugs, despite their limited and short-term effects, the risk for adverse side effects and dependence, and the fact that CBT-I is the recommended first-line treatment. Reasons may include lack of knowledge about insomnia, a culture of prescribing hypnotics, lack of time during consultations, and a shortage of CBT-I providers. Sleep restriction therapy is one of the core components of CBT-I. It is a behavioral technique that may be feasible to deliver in routine care with existing resources and time constraints. Objectives: This randomized controlled trial aims to investigate whether brief, behavioral group therapy in primary care based on sleep restriction therapy reduces insomnia severity and is cost-effective. A process evaluation will explore barriers and facilitators for participation and delivery. Methods: Health care professionals from participating primary health care centers will complete a 1.5-day digital course on assessing patients for insomnia and delivering the intervention. Patients who seek primary health care and meet the study criteria will be randomized to sleep restriction therapy or to receive written sleep hygiene information. Both groups will be free to seek and receive standard care for insomnia. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics will be collected prior to baseline. Study outcomes include insomnia severity, sleep, daytime symptoms, quality of life, use of hypnotics, sick leave, and work ability. Outcomes will be assessed over a 24-month period. The cost-effectiveness analysis will include the number of insomnia-free days at the 12-month follow-up and quality-adjusted life years. Patient characteristics will be analyzed in relation to adherence, and response. Qualitative explorations of patients and nurses' experiences will be conducted alongside the trial (approximately 15 patients and 15 nurses).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
104
The intervention includes psychoeducation and sleep restriction therapy, sleep restriction instructions, problem-solving, and support for participants in adjusting sleep restriction instructions to their individual needs and life circumstances. At the final session, participants create an individual plan for maintaining new sleep habits and coping with insomnia relapse. During the intervention, participants are free to seek and receive standard care for insomnia.
The control condition will include written, general information about sleep and lifestyle and environmental factors that could improve or disturb sleep. The participants will be free to seek and receive standard care for insomnia.
Christina Sandlund
Stockholm, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Sweden
Change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score
The ISI is a 7-item scale that asesses the severity of sleep disturbance, how much sleep disturbance interferes with daily life and functioning, the noticeability of these impairments to others, worry and distress resulting from sleep disturbance, and general sleep satisfaction/dissatisfaction. Responses are provided on a Likert-scale (0-4). The total score ranges from 0 to 28, and higher scores indicate more severe problems.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after baseline
Change in sleep efficiency derived from sleep diary
Sleep efficiency (percentage of time asleep while in bed) will be calculated on the basis of self-reported sleep at each measurement point.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after baseline
Change in sleep onset latency derived from sleep diary
Sleep onset latency (time to initiation of sleep after going to bed for the night) will be calculated on the basis of self-reported sleep at each measurement point.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after baseline
Change in time awake after sleep onset derived from sleep diary
Time awake after sleep onset calculated on the basis of self-reported sleep at each measurement point.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after baseline
Change in number of nocturnal awakenings derived from sleep diary
Number of nocturnal awakenings calculated on the basis of self-reported sleep at each measurement point.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after baseline
Change in sleep quality derived from sleep diary
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Perceived sleep quality will be calculated on the basis of self-reported sleep at each measurement point. The variable is rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate better sleep quality.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after baseline
Change in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) score
The FSS is a 9-item scale that measures the interference of fatigue with daily life. Each item is rated on a scale that ranges from 1 to 7. Higher total scores indicate more severe fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after baseline
Change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale - self-rating version (MADRS-S) score
MADRS-S includes 9 items that measure the severity of depressive symptoms (mood, feelings of unease, sleep, appetite, ability to concentrate, initiative, emotional involvement, pessimism, and zest for life). Each item includes six statements ranging from the most positive (statement 0) to the least positive (statement 6). The total score ranges from 0 to 54. The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after baseline
Changes in the EQ-5D score
EQ-5D is a generic measure of health status that measures quality of life in five health domains: mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/suffering, and anxiety/depression. The response scale for each domain ranges from no problems (0) to severe problems (3). EQ-5D also includes a visual scale for each theme and for overall health status. Together, the responses form 248 different health profiles, each of which is assigned a point value that makes it possible to compare results.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after baseline
Changes in the Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale (DBAS) score
DBAS measures dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes on an analog scale labeled "strongly disagree" to the left and "strongly agree" to the right. Respondents place a vertical mark at the point on the line that corresponds to degree that they disagree or agree with the statement. The distance (mm) from the left end of the line to the vertical mark is measured and used as the score. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate stronger agreement with the statement.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after baseline
Changes in Work Ability Index (WAI) score
The WAI includes seven domains that measure current work ability compared with the lifetime best (0-10 points), work ability in relation to the demands of the job (2-10 points), number of current diseases diagnosed by a physician (1-7 points), estimated work impairment due to diseases (1-6 points), sickness leave during the past year (1-5 points), own prognosis of work ability two years from now (1, 4, or 7 points), and mental resources (1-4 points). The total score ranges from 7 to 49. Higher scores indicate better work ability.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year after baseline, and 2 years after baseline
Changes in Short Form Health Survey-12 (SF- 12) score
The SF-12 includes 12 items that measure health-related quality of life. The number of response alternatives varies by item. An algorithm is used to calculate final scores, which range from 0 to 100. Higher score indicate better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after baseline
Change in Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) scores
The WSAI is a 5-item scale that measures functional impairment related to sleep problems. Response alternatives range from 0 (not at all) to 8 (very severely). The total score ranges from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after baseline
Changes in self-reported hypnotic drug use
A questionnaire that measures the frequency (including name and amount taken) of the use of prescribed hypnotics on a Likert scale ranging from never (1) to daily (6). Higher scores indicate more frequent use.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after baseline
Changes in self-reported sick leave
Participants will be asked to report the number of days they have been on sick leave.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year after baseline, and 2 years after baseline
Treatment side effects
Participants will complete a questionnaire that includes 10 items that measure the perceived severity of potential side effects of sleep restriction therapy on a Likert scale. The scores range from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicate more severe side effects. The questionnaire also includes a question asking about the time for side effects (e.g., in the beginning of treatment, mid-treatment etc.).
Time frame: 3 months after baseline
Treatment adherence
Participants will complete a questionnaire that includes nine items that measure self-rated adherence to sleep restriction therapy on a Likert scale. Higher scores indicate better adherence. The score on each item range from 1 to 4.
Time frame: 3 months after baseline