Phase III, multinational, multicentre, randomized, prospective, double blind, parallel groups, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the analgesic effects of Test Diclofenac Sodium 140mg medicated plaster, Reference DIEP 180 mg medicated plaster, Flector® and Placebo plaster in patients with painful and phlogistic disease due to acute traumatic events of the limbs.
This will be a Phase III, multinational, multicentre, randomized, prospective, double blind, parallel groups, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the analgesic effects of Test Diclofenac Sodium 140mg medicated plaster (once a day), Reference DIEP 180 mg medicated plaster, Flector® (once a day) and Placebo plaster once a day (i.e. the placebo arm) in patients with painful and phlogistic (inflammatory response) disease due to acute traumatic events (injury/contusion) of the limbs.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
214
Test product: Diclofenac Sodium 140 mg medicated plaster, topical application once a day
Reference product: Active-comparator, Diclofenac epolamine (DIEP) 180 mg medicated plaster, Flector®, topical application once a day
Placebo: Placebo plaster, topical application once a day.
Praxis Dr. med. Helmut Pabst
Gilching, Germany
Praxis Dr. Jürgen Ulrich Schaale-Maas
Rheinbach, Germany
Synexus Budapest DRC
Change from baseline in VAS score (Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to 100 mm, where the left extreme means "No pain = 0" while the right extreme means "Worst Pain Imaginable = 100") for pain at rest at 72 ± 2 hours (Day 4) after treatment start.
Non-inferior efficacy of Test (once a day) over Reference (once a day) in reduction of pain after 3 days post-Baseline (72± 2 hours, Day 4), and superior efficacy of Test and Reference to Placebo (once a day) in improving pain at rest at 72 ± 2 hours (Day 4) after Baseline in patients with painful and phlogistic disease due to acute traumatic events of the limbs. A 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) will be used for the assessment of pain at rest, from 0 to 100, where "No pain = 0" while "Worst Pain Imaginable = 100".
Time frame: 72 hours
Area under the curve (AUC) for pain at rest at Day 4 and Day 8 (SPID0-4d and SPID0-8d)
To compare Test to Reference and Placebo with regard to pain relief (pain at rest and pain on movement) at Day 4 and Day8, assessed through the AUC (Area Under the Curve) of VAS measurements (Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to 100 mm, where the left extreme means "No pain = 0" while the right extreme means "Worst Pain Imaginable = 100") at Day 4 and Day 8.
Time frame: Day 4 and Day 8
Change from baseline of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale 0-100 mm, where "No pain = 0" and "Worst Pain Imaginable = 100") for pain at rest at the other study time-points (including patients' home measurements), from Day 1 to Day 8.
To compare efficacy of the Test product to Reference and Placebo with regard to pain relief (pain at rest and pain on movement) from Day 1 to Day 8.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5,Day 6, Day 7, Day 8
Time to resolution of pain at rest, measured through VAS Scale (Visual Analogue Scale 0-100 mm, where "No pain = 0" and "Worst Pain Imaginable = 100") during from Baseline to Day 8.
To compare efficacy of Test in comparison to Reference and Placebo with regard to time to resolution of pain (pain at rest and pain on movement), measured with VAS score (Visual Analogue Scale 0-100 mm, where "No pain = 0" and "Worst Pain Imaginable = 100").
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Budapest, Hungary
Magyar Honvédség, Egészségügyi Központ Baleseti Sebészeti Osztály
Budapest, Hungary
Uzsoki utcai Kórház Ortopéd-traumatológiai Osztály
Budapest, Hungary
Synexus Debrecen AS
Debrecen, Hungary
Platán Egészségcentrum
Eger, Hungary
Synexus Magyarország kft. Gyula DRS
Gyula, Hungary
Shawfar-med Kft
Kalocsa, Hungary
Jutrix Kft.
Kecskemét, Hungary
...and 6 more locations
Time frame: From Day 1 until the date of resolution of pain at rest (maximum Day 8)
Change from baseline in VAS score (Visual Analogue Scale 0-100 mm, where "No pain = 0" and "Worst Pain Imaginable = 100") for pain on movement at 72 ± 2 hours (Day 4) and at 168 ± 2 hours (Day 8) after treatment start
To compare efficacy of Test to Reference and Placebo with regard to pain relief (pain on movement), measured with VAS score (Visual Analogue Scale 0-100 mm, where "No pain = 0" and "Worst Pain Imaginable = 100") at Day 4 and Day 8.
Time frame: Day 4 and Day 8
Proportion of responder patients (defined as a decrease ≥ 50% of baseline VAS (Visual Analogue Scale 0-100 mm, where "No pain = 0" and "Worst Pain Imaginable = 100") for pain at rest and on movement) at 72 ± 2 hours (Day 4) after treatment start
To compare efficacy of Test to Reference and Placebo with regard to proportion of responders to pain relief (pain at rest and pain on movement) at Day 4, considering a decrease as ≥ 50% of baseline VAS (Visual Analogue Scale 0-100 mm, where "No pain = 0" and "Worst Pain Imaginable = 100")
Time frame: Day 4
Proportion of patients that used rescue medication (paracetamol) from Baseline to Day 8 usign a patient diary
To compare the proportion of patients that used rescue medication from Baseline to Day 8 among the three treatment arms (Test, Refrence and Placebo) using a patient diary
Time frame: From Baseline to Day 8
Amount of tablets of rescue medication consumed from Baseline to Day 8, using a patient diary
To compare the amount of consumption of tablets of paracetamol among the three treatment arms (Test, Refrence and Placebo) using a patient diary
Time frame: From Baseline to Day 8
IMP adhesion, performed daily by patients and at Day 4 and Day 8 by the open staff member; following 5-point ordinal scale: 0:≥90% adhered; 1:≥75% to <90% adhered; 2:≥50% to <75% adhered; 3:<50% adhered but not detached; 4:Plaster detached
To compare the adhesion of Test to Reference and Placebo in the site of application from Baseline to Day 8, 5-point ordinal scale: 0:≥90% adhered; 1:≥75% to \<90% adhered; 2:≥50% to \<75% adhered; 3:\<50% adhered but not detached; 4:Plaster detached
Time frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5,Day 6, Day 7, Day 8
Safety as change from baseline to Day 8 evaluated by physical examination using observation, palpitation, percussion, and auscultation
To compare Test with Reference and Placebo in patient safety as change from baseline to Day 8 using observation, palpitation, percussion, and auscultation
Time frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day3, Day 4, Day 5,Day 6, Day 7, Day 8
Safety as change from baseline to Day 8 evaluated by systolic blood pressure measured in mmHg
To compare Test with Reference and Placebo in systolic blood pressure, measured in mmHg, as change from baseline to Day 8
Time frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day3, Day 4, Day 5,Day 6, Day 7, Day 8
Safety as change from baseline to Day 8 evaluated by diastolic blood pressure measured in mmHg
To compare Test with Reference and Placebo in diastolic blood pressure, measured in mmHg, as change from baseline to Day 8
Time frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day3, Day 4, Day 5,Day 6, Day 7, Day 8
Safety as change from baseline to Day 8 evaluated by heart rate measured in bpm
To compare Test with Reference and Placebo in heart rate, measured in bpm, as change from baseline to Day 8
Time frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day3, Day 4, Day 5,Day 6, Day 7, Day 8
Safety as change from baseline to Day 8 evaluated by tracking the number of patient withdrawals
To compare Test with Reference and Placebo in patient safety as change from baseline to Day 8, tracking the number of withdrawals
Time frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day3, Day 4, Day 5,Day 6, Day 7, Day 8
Safety as change from baseline to Day 8 evaluated by tracking the number of adverse events
To compare Test with Reference and Placebo in patient safety as change from baseline to Day 8, tracking the number of adverse events
Time frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day3, Day 4, Day 5,Day 6, Day 7, Day 8
Local tolerability (erythema) at the IMP application site by Investigator at Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8 based on a 8-point categorical scale, where 0=no evidence of irritation and 7=strong reaction spreading beyond test site
To compare Test with Reference and Placebo in relation to the level of irritation on the application site
Time frame: Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8
Local tolerability (itching) at the IMP application site by Investigator at Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8 based on a 4-point categorical scale, where 0=absent and 3=severe
To compare Test with Reference and Placebo in relation to the level of itching on the application site
Time frame: Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8
Local tolerability (burning) at the IMP application site by Investigator at Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8 based on a 4-point categorical scale, where 0=absent and 3=severe
To compare Test with Reference and Placebo in relation to the level of burning on the application site
Time frame: Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8
Local tolerability (local pain) at the IMP application site by Investigator at Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8 based on a 4-point categorical scale, where 0=absent and 3=severe
To compare Test with Reference and Placebo in relation to the level of local pain on the application site
Time frame: Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8
Global assessment of local tolerability at IMP administration site by Investigator and patient according to the following score: 3=excellent; 2=good; 1=fair; 0=poor, assessed at Day 4 and Day 8.
To compare Test with Reference and Placebo in relation to the global assessment of local tolerability on the application site
Time frame: Day 4 and Day 8