Shared decision making (SDM) is an approach where clinicians and patients make decisions together using the best available evidence. An understanding of the patient's treatment goals, the advantages and disadvantages of treatment options, and the likelihood of achieving the outcomes are important to patients. International guidelines recommend that all patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at pre-dialysis stage should be educated to improve their knowledge and understanding of their condition and to choose the options for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Despite these recommendations, pre-dialysis educations are often infrequent. Many patients feel unprepared. Wrong or insufficient understanding due to insufficient explanation of treatment can lead to negative emotions. This may lead to a situation in which the patient loses the opportunity to make patient's own choices, resulting in emergency dialysis or dialysis modality that is not suitable for patients. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate whether SDM has an effect on the choice of RRT among CKD patients.
This study will be conducted as a multicenter, open-label, randomized, pragmatic clinical trial. A total of 1,194 participants with CKD considering RRT will be randomized into 3 groups. Patients in the conventional group will have education using leaflets. Patients in the extensive informed decision making (EIDM) group will receive more detailed education using intensive learning materials than those in the conventional group. Shared decision making (SDM) group patients will have education according to questionnaires of self-assessment items using a self-developed counseling calendar.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1,194
Bundang Seoul National University Hospital
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital
Daegu, South Korea
Kyungpook National University Hospital
Daegu, South Korea
Daejeon Eulji Medical Center
Daejeon, South Korea
Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital
Goyang, South Korea
Chonnam National University Hospital
Gwangju, South Korea
Gachon University Gil Medical Center
Incheon, South Korea
Pusan National University Hospital
Pusan, South Korea
Ewha Woman's University Seoul Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Korea University Guro Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
...and 9 more locations
The ratio of hemodialysis to non-hemodialysis
To compare the proportion of hemodialysis versus non-hemodialysis (peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplantation) treatments among the groups
Time frame: 12 months
Economic efficiency using a cost-utility analysis
The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) is calculated by the ratio of differences in costs and utilities.
Time frame: Month 2, and 12
Patients' satisfaction assessed by Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (ZUF-8)
The ZUF-8 is an 8-items questionnaire to assess satisfaction in patients using a scale from 1,"poor" to 4,"excellent". Originally, ZUF-8 used a 4-point scale, but in this study, the investigators further extended the scoring system of this questionnaire from four to five incremental stages of perceived satisfaction, i.e. "poor (1)," rather good (2)," good (3)," very good (4)," extraordinary (5)". The minimum value is 8 and the maximum value is 40. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0, 2, and 12
Patients' evaluation of the SDM process assessed by Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)
The SDM-Q-9 questionnaire is a nine item measure. Items are reported with six response options ranging from 0, "completely disagree", to 5, "completely agree". In this study, six response options were converted into five incremental stages, i.e. "strongly disagree (1)," somewhat disagree (2)," neither disagree nor agree (3)," somewhat agree (4)," strongly agree (5)". To calculate the total scale score, items are summed resulting in a range from 9-45. Higher scores reflect a participant's participation in shared decision making regarding their treatment.
Time frame: Month 0, 2, and 12
Patients' adherence to medication assessed by Morisky 8-item Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8)
The MMAS-8 is an 8-items questionnaire and the scale included 7 items with yes/no response options and 1 item with a 5-point Likert scale response option. Cumulative score based on 8 items are used to obtain final adherence score ranging from 0 to 8. Adherence is defined accordingly as low (score 0-5), medium (score 6-7) and high (score 8).
Time frame: Month 0, 2, and 12
unplanned dialysis
To compare the rate of unplanned dialysis among the groups
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.