This study evaluates a remotely supervised, home-based therapeutic program to improve upper-limb voluntary movement in adults with tetraplegia caused by incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI).
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) has been associated with serious reduction in functional independence. Despite compelling evidence that treatment intensity has a profound effect on motor recovery only a small fraction of SCI population are able to receive intensive in-clinic treatment. Difficulty traveling to the clinic, poor adherence to assignments and high cost are limiting factors. Currently, telerehabilitation programs are emerging as an alternative effective method of delivery for rehabilitation services. The literature and our preliminary findings support the model that augmentation of activity in spared corticospinal tract (CST) axons is a critical mechanism of motor improvement, and furthermore that CST activity can be increased by repetitive motor training and by electrical stimulation of the primary motor cortex (M1). However, there is still lack of knowledge on safety, feasibility and efficacy of remotely- supervised home-based therapy programs that incorporates non-invasive brain stimulation and high intensity repetitive arm exercises. To address these questions, 36 adults (above 18 years) with cervical SCI will be randomly assigned to two groups in a 2:1 ratio (active stimulation group, n=24 vs control group, n=12) and receive daily treatment, 10 sessions, over 2-weeks. The anodal tDCS will be applied over primary motor cortex (M1) at an intensity of 2mA for 20 minutes and proceed with 60 minutes of repetitive arm and hand training. Primary outcome measure is change in Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension (GRASSP) from baseline to immediately after treatment and 4-weeks follow-up. The session will be supervised in real-time via videoconferencing.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
20
Anodal tDCS will be placed over the primary motor cortex and delivered at 2mA for 20 minutes. Immediately after stimulation ceases, participants will continue with unilateral repetitive arm and finger exercises for 60 minutes. Exercise difficulty will gradually be increased and adjusted per participant's tolerance.
Anodal tDCS will be placed over the primary motor cortex and delivered at 2mA for 20 minutes. Immediately after stimulation ceases, participants will continue with unilateral repetitive arm and finger exercises for 60 minutes. Exercise difficulty will gradually be increased and adjusted per participant's tolerance.
The Institute for Rehabilitation and Research (TIRR) at Memorial Hermann
Houston, Texas, United States
Arm and Hand Function as Assessed by Score on the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP)
The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) assesses the integration of sensorimotor hand and upper limb impairment and function. GRASSP total score will be reported, and it ranges from 0 to 116, with a higher score indicating a higher level of arm and hand function.
Time frame: Baseline
Arm and Hand Function as Assessed by Score on the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP)
The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) assesses the integration of sensorimotor hand and upper limb impairment and function. GRASSP total score will be reported, and it ranges from 0 to 116, with a higher score indicating a higher level of arm and hand function.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Arm and Hand Function as Assessed by Score on the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP)
The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) assesses the integration of sensorimotor hand and upper limb impairment and function. GRASSP total score will be reported, and it ranges from 0 to 116, with a higher score indicating a higher level of arm and hand function.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Adherence With the Therapy as Assessed by the Number of Sessions Participants Attended
Time frame: Treatment Day 1- Day 10
Adherence With the Therapy as Assessed by the Number of Participant Drop-outs
Time frame: Between enrollment and 6 weeks
Feasibility of Home Intervention as Indicated by Participants' Perceptions of Usefulness of the Intervention as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Participants rated the usefulness of the interventions on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating not useful at all and 10 indicating very useful.
Time frame: Day 10
Grip Strength
Maximum force generated by hand muscles and measured with a hand-held dynamometer
Time frame: Baseline
Grip Strength
Maximum force generated by hand muscles and measured with a hand-held dynamometer
Time frame: 2 weeks
Grip Strength
Maximum force generated by hand muscles and measured with a hand-held dynamometer
Time frame: 6 weeks
Self Care as Assessed by Score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III)
Total score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III) ranges between 0 to 20, with a higher score indicating a higher level of independence in daily functions.
Time frame: Baseline
Self Care as Assessed by Score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III)
Total score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III) ranges between 0 to 20, with a higher score indicating a higher level of independence in daily functions.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Self Care as Assessed by Score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III)
Total score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III) ranges between 0 to 20, with a higher score indicating a higher level of independence in daily functions.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Number of Participants Who Had Adverse Events
Time frame: from baseline to 6 weeks
Feasibility of Home Intervention as Indicated by Participants' Perceptions of Level of Difficulty of Using tDCS as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Participants rated the level of difficulty of using tDCS on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating not difficult at all and 10 indicating very difficult
Time frame: Day 10
Feasibility of Home Intervention as Indicated by Participants' Perceptions of Level of Difficulty of Using Exercise Equipment as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Participants rated the level of difficulty of using exercise equipment on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating not difficult at all and 10 indicating very difficult.
Time frame: Day 10