Low back pain is presently the first cause of disability worldwide. The most recommended interventions by clinical guidelines are exercises and cognitive behavioral therapy although the effect is modest. However, no approach is superior when given to a heterogeneous group of subjects with chronic low back pain (CLBP). This is probably due to the multiple factors associated with CLBP which are biophysical, psychological and social. Thus, each patient presents with a unique profile of factors contributing to their pain and could benefit from an approach tailored to their profile. In other words, it is crucial to identify the right treatment, for the right person, at the right moment. For example, the presence of important psychological factors such as anxiety and depression are risk factors for low back pain to develop and persist over time. The main aim of this project is to determine the feasibility to perform a large clinical trial comparing the efficacy of a two physiotherapy's approaches to treat CLBP (i.e., a psychologically-informed physiotherapy intervention compared to usual physiotherapy) in patients with CLBP presenting a high level of psychological factors.
Low back pain is presently the first cause of disability worldwide. The most recommended interventions by clinical guidelines are exercises and cognitive behavioral therapy although the effect is modest. However, no approach is superior when given to a heterogeneous group of subjects with chronic low back pain (CLBP). This is probably due to the multiple factors associated with CLBP which are biophysical, psychological and social. Thus, each patient presents with a unique profile of factors contributing to their pain and could benefit from an approach tailored to their profile. In other words, it is crucial to identify the right treatment, for the right person, at the right moment. For example, the presence of important psychological factors such as anxiety and depression are risk factors for low back pain to develop and persist over time. Empowerment of physiotherapists and patients on the optimal management of psychosocial factors, in addition of the usual care delivered in physiotherapy, may be a potent strategy to improve the treatment effect especially with patients presenting a complex clinical profile. This empowerment may be done through psychologically-informed physiotherapy, an approach incorporating strategies from cognitive behavioral therapy into the physiotherapy usual practice. However, the feasibility to perform a clinical trial including psychologically-informed physiotherapy in the context of the Quebec's healthcare system remains to be verified. The main aim of this project is to determine the feasibility to perform a pilot randomised controlled trial testing the efficacy of a psychologically-informed physiotherapy intervention in CLBP patients with a high level of psychosocial factors compared to usual physiotherapy. Specific aims are related to feasibility (1) and sample size estimation (2): 1. To test (a) strategies to recruit participants with high level of psychosocial factors and physiotherapists (PT) (recruitment rate and retention), (b) the physiotherapists and participants adherence to intervention, (c) the risk of contamination between treatment sites and (d) specific challenges; 2. To gather data to estimate the required sample size for a future full-scale randomized clinical trial using physical functioning as main outcome, and pain intensity, quality of life, fear of movement, catastrophizing, self-efficacy, pain pressure threshold, exercise-induced hypoalgesia and temporal summation as additional outcomes. The hypothesis is that this project will be feasible in terms of recruitment for both patients (\~30) and PT (6-8), will show good patients and physiotherapists' adherence to intervention and low contamination between treatment sites. An improvement for all pain-related outcomes in both groups, but more in the psychologically-informed physiotherapy group, is also expected.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
40
Participants from each group will receive 8 intervention sessions (45 min) over 11 weeks by a physiotherapist. For both groups, each intervention will be tailored to the patient's profile and the choice of interventions and parameters will be at the judgment of the physiotherapist.
Cirris (Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Sociale)
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Recruitment rate of participants
The number of participants contacted divided by the number of participants recruited.
Time frame: Baseline
Physiotherapists adherence to intervention
Physiotherapists will complete a list of interventions used after each interventions (8 interventions on period of 6 weeks).
Time frame: Week 6
Risk of contamination between treatment sites
The list of interventions used by physiotherapists at each site will be compared to evaluate the risk of contamination between treatment sites.
Time frame: Week 6
Specific challenges
Using semi-structured interview with the physio.
Time frame: Through data collection completion, an average of 1 year
Retention of participants
The number of participants who completed the study divided by the number of participants that were recruited.
Time frame: Baseline, when a participant drop out
Participants adherence to intervention
Participants will measure their adherence to intervention on a Numeric Rating Scale from 0 (not adherent at all) to 10 (completely adherent).
Time frame: Week 6
Physical functioning (ODI)
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a self-completed questionnaire on estimated disability including 10 questions rated on a 6-item scale, from 0 (no disability) to 5 points (maximal disability).
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24
Pain intensity (NRS)
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is an 11-point scale used to score the intensity of pain in the last week ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24
Quality of life (SF-12)
The 12-Item Short Form Survey is a self-completed questionnaire counting 12 questions on eight mental and physical health domains. The score is calculated by a specific calculator that compares the score to the general population.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24
Fear of movement (TSK-11)
The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia is a self-completed questionnaire used to assess fear of movement using 11 questions on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree, low level of kinesiophobia) to 4 (strongly agree, high level of kinesiophobia).
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24
Catastrophizing thoughts (PCS)
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a self-completed questionnaire of 13 questions measuring catastrophizing thoughts contributing to pain on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all, low level of catastrophizing thoughts) to 5 (all the time, high level of catastrophizing thoughts).
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24
Self-efficacy (CPSES)
The Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale (CPSES) (short form) is a self-completed questionnaire of 6 questions measuring self-efficacy on a 10-point scale from 0 (not at all confident, low self-efficacy) to 10 (completely confident, high self-efficacy).
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24
Participant's expectations
Participant's expectations regarding treatment will be measured with a self-completed questionnaire of three 7-level Likert questions on pain, physical functioning and participation ranging from 0 (way better) to 6 (way worst).
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24
Central Sensitization (CSI)
The Central Sensitization Index (CSI) is a self-completed questionnaire of 9 questions measuring central sensitization on a 5-point scale from 0 (never, low level of central sensitization) to 5 (always, high level of central sensitization).
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24
Global rating of change (GRC)
The Global rating of change (GRC) is a 11-point scale ranging from -5 (a great deal worst) to 5 (a great deal better) to measure the perceived change oh health status after the intervention.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24
Pain pressure threshold
Pain pressure thresholds will be measured at 3 sites (L4-L5 paravertebral, upper and lower legs) using a digital algometer before and after an exercise of wrist flexion (maintaining 25% of the maximal voluntary contraction activity during 4 minutes) to test the exercise-induced hypoalgesia paradigm.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6
Temporal summation
Temporal summations will be measured at 3 sites (L4-L5 paravertebral, upper and lower legs) using a pinprick before the exercise of wrist flexion.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.