The hypothesis is that 3 months' treatment with SZC versus placebo will enable RASi (Irbesartan) maximisation in a cohort of patients with diabetic kidney disease.
Inhibiting the renin angiotensin (RAS) system has been the cornerstone of therapy for patients with proteinuric CKD for almost 2 decades, to slow the decline in renal function, delay the presence of dialysis and reduce cardiovascular events and death. There is evidence in both the cardiac and renal literature that suggests that maximising the dose of RAS therapy leads to improved outcomes over smaller doses of RAS therapy. Indeed, many of the studies on which we base our care use doses which are higher than what the majority of our patients are taking. Thus patients are being systemically undertreated by therapies which have been shown to have robust reno protection. With up to 80% of patients on RASi therapy are not on maximal RASi therapy , putting them at risk of a more rapid progression and poorer outcomes and increased healthcare costs. An important reason for this is the presence or fear around hyperkalaemia. With reports of significantly increased rate of hyperkalaemia seen following increases in prescribing of RASi therapy. These concerns have lead NICE to recommend not starting patients on RASi therapy if their potassium is \>5mmol/l, and KDOQI guidelines recommending consideration of stopping RASi therapy if serum potassium is \>5.5mmol/l. ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers are thought to confer long term renal protection through reduction of proteinuria. The reduction in glomerular pressure is a major mechanism leading to a reduction in proteinuria, and hence renal protection, however as a consequence there will also an acute fall in eGFR. Therefore, when starting/up titrating ACEi/ARB it is expected that there will be an acute fall in eGFR, which is expected to be more than compensated for due to the subsequent long term renal protection. Indeed, current NICE guidelines do not suggest any alteration in management until the drop in eGFR is \>25%. There is a currently huge unmet need to optimise RASi therapy in those patients with hyperkalaemia. There have been recent advances in novel therapeutics which can lower potassium in patients. One such agent is Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC). SZC is a highly selective inorganic cation exchanger designed to entrap potassium in the intestine. It has been shown to effective in lowering potassium in patients with heart failure, Diabetes, CKD and RASi therapy. With around a 1mmol/l fall in the serum potassium on those treated with SZC, compared to placebo. In the 5-large clinical trials it appears efficacious, well tolerated and safe.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
18
sachets of 5g or 10g given OD titrated to serum potassium
matched placebo given titrated according to potassium at a dose to 5 or 10g
Kieran Mccafferty
London, Uk, United Kingdom
Proportion of Patients on Maximum Dose (300mg) Irbesartan Therapy at 12 Weeks Compared to Placebo
Difference in proportion of patients on maximum dose (300mg) Irbesartan therapy at the end of 12 weeks compared to placebo. Proportion is calculated per arm as number of individuals on maximum dose Irbesatan therapy divided by the number of individuals in the study arm. The difference in proportion is calculated as experimental arm - placebo comparator arm.
Time frame: Study end (week 12)
Change in Potassium From Baseline at Each Time Point
Difference in potassium from baseline at each study visit (weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8,12) calculated as a mean for each study visit.
Time frame: At each study visit (weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8,12)
Change in the BP at the End of the Study From Baseline
Difference in systolic and diastolic BP from baseline to end of study follow-up (week 12) calculated as a mean for each study visit.
Time frame: Study end (week 12)
Proportion of Patients Who Have a Potassium of >6mmol/l, or >6.5mmol/l at Any Time During the Study
Difference in proportion of patients who have a potassium of \>6mmol/l,, or \>6.5mmol/l at any time during the study. Proportion is calculated per arm as number of individuals with a maximum potassium across study follow-up of \>6mmol/l or \>6.5mmol/l divided by the number of individuals in the study arm. The difference in proportion is calculated as experimental arm - placebo comparator arm.
Time frame: Cumulative across study follow-up, assessed at study end (week 12)
Proportion of Patients Who Have a Potassium of <3.5mmol/l •
Difference in proportion of patients who have a potassium of \<3.5mmol/l at any time during the study. Proportion is calculated per arm as number of individuals with a minimum potassium of \<3.5mmol/l across study follow-up divided by the number of individuals in the study arm. The difference in proportion is calculated as experimental arm - placebo comparator arm.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Cumulative across study follow-up, assessed at study end (week 12)
Proportion of Patients Whose Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Falls by >30% From the Previous Visit •
Difference in proportion of patients with a sudden drop in GFR defined as \>30% decreased between study visits. Proportion is calculated per arm as number of individuals experiencing a sudden drop of GFR divided by the number of individuals in the study arm. The difference in proportion is calculated as experimental arm - placebo comparator arm.
Time frame: Cumulative. Calculated at each study visit. Assessed at study end (week 12).
Change in GFR at the End of Study From Baseline
Difference in GFR from baseline to end of study follow-up (week 12) calculated as a mean for each study visit.
Time frame: Study end (week 12)
Frequency of Adverse Events
A count of the number of adverse events reported in each study arm
Time frame: Study end (week 12)