This study is a retrospective, multi-center real world study. The real world data comes from the electronic medical record system and disease database of the research centers .The patient's demographic information, disease information, clinical treatment status, efficacy evaluation and adverse events and so on will be collected and evaluated by applicability of the data, generated an analysis data set. Use the causal inference method of statistical analysis to observe the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal injection of Conbercept, and explore the effectiveness and safety of different doses in the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
1,000
Peking University People's Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
West China Hospital of Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Main effectiveness indicators
Proportion of eyes with no active retinopathy of prematurity and no structural adverse outcome (within 24 weeks after the first treatment; active retinopathy of prematurity is defined as additional lesions, vascular tortuosity, crest and other lesions having no alleviation but trend of progress after clinical treatment and new blood vessels continuing to exist or new born; poor structural outcomes are defined as adverse results such as retinal detachment, retinal traction or macular abnormalities after clinical treatment)
Time frame: 24 weeks
Main safety indicators
The proportion of affected eyes with ocular AEs (within 24 weeks after the first treatment)
Time frame: 24weeks
Primary endpoint
To evaluate the proportion of eyes with inactive retinopathy of prematurity and without structural adverse outcomes at 24 weeks after the first treatment (inactive retinopathy of prematurity is defined as the reduction in additional lesions, vascular tortuosity, ridges and other lesions after clinical treatment, showing no trend of progression, no persistent or newly developed neovascularization; no structural adverse outcome is defined as the absence of adverse outcomes such as retinal detachment, retinal traction, or macular abnormalities after clinical treatment)
Time frame: 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
To evaluate the response rate of the first treatment at 1 week and 24 weeks after the first treatment (the response rate is defined as the proportion of patients after the first treatment who do not need the second treatment, with disappearance of the additional lesions or the reduction of the vascular tortuosity, the reduction or regression of the ridges, and with initiation of vascularization in the neighboring avas-cular area (or retinal vascularization to zone III);
Time frame: at 1 week and 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
To evaluate the proportion of eyes with recurrence and the time to recurrence at 24 weeks after the first treatment (recurrence is defined as the recurrence of ridgelike changes or fibrovascular proliferation in the original lesion, complicated by the recurrence of additional lesions in the posterior pole);
Time frame: at 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
To evaluate the proportion of eyes undergoing the second treatment within 24 weeks after the first treatment (the second treatment is defined as the second treatment that is given after the first treatment, regardless of whether the treatment measure is adjusted or not);
Time frame: within 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
To evaluate the proportion of target eyes requiring a second treatment modality within 24 weeks after the first treatment (the treatment modality means laser therapy, anti-VEGF drug therapy and surgery, and the second treatment modality includes change of anti-VEGF drug);
Time frame: within 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
To evaluate the proportion of target eyes whose treatment measures were switched within 24 weeks after the first treatment (the switching treatment is defined as the conversion to laser therapy, anti-VEGF drug therapy and surgery);
Time frame: within 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
To evaluate the number of treatments with Conbercept, ranibizumab, and laser within 24 weeks after the first treatment;
Time frame: within 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
To evaluate the proportion of eyes with ocular AEs within 24 weeks after the first treatment;
Time frame: within 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
To evaluate the proportion of eyes with TEAEs within 24 weeks after the first treatment;
Time frame: within 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
To evaluate the proportion of eyes with aggravated retinopathy staging at 24 weeks after the first treatment;
Time frame: at 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
To evaluate the incidence of endophthalmitis within 24 weeks after the first treatment;
Time frame: within 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
To evaluate the proportion of eyes undergoing vitreous surgery within 24 weeks after the first treatment;
Time frame: within 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
To evaluate the proportion of eyes with ROP complications within 24 weeks after the first treatment. (Complications include cataracts, glaucoma, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment, fibrosis, and ocular atrophy, etc.)
Time frame: within 24 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.