PNEUmonia DOSing in Critically Ill Patients (PNEUDOS)

Overview

Pneumonia is the most common infection in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and occurs in 10% of all ICU admissions. Unfortunately, ICU patient outcomes remain poor with a high mortality rate associated with pneumonia despite recent therapeutic advances. Previous studies of antibiotics used in ICU patients, which includes ceftriaxone, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam, have quantified major differences in pharmacokinetics (PK) between ICU and non-ICU patients, with ICU patients displaying a unique spectrum of plasma concentration-time profiles. These PK differences can lead to suboptimal antibiotic concentrations in blood, which have been associated with a reduced likelihood of clinical cure for pneumonia. Furthermore, highlighting the importance of optimised dosing for pneumonia is that multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens emerge during antibiotic therapy in approximately half of the ICU patients, frequently emerging from the lung. Previous work has highlighted how infection site concentrations determine patient outcome. For pneumonia, the infection site is best described as the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) in the lung. Although optimal antibiotic therapy should be considered a priority for ICU patients with pneumonia to improve the persisting poor outcomes, the dosing regimens that can achieve therapeutic concentrations at the infection site (i.e., ELF) in ICU patients with pneumonia remain unknown. The PNEUDOS study aims to address this significant knowledge gap by defining novel individualised dosing regimens that can maximise antibiotic efficacy by achieving therapeutic concentrations in the blood and ELF of ICU patients with pneumonia. These dosing regimens can then be validated in future clinical trials.

Hypotheses 1. The pharmacokinetics of benzylpenicillin, ceftriaxone, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam are significantly different in ICU patients with pneumonia when compared to those of non-ICU and non-infected patients. 2. Altered beta-lactam antibiotic dosing approaches, as opposed to "contemporary" or "standard" dosing, are required for maximally effective blood (i.e., plasma) and epithelial lining fluid beta-lactam exposures in ICU patients with pneumonia. 3. Beta-lactam antibiotic exposures in epithelial lining fluid influence levels of lung inflammation in ICU patients with pneumonia. Objective: The overall objective of this study is to characterise the plasma and epithelial lining fluid pharmacokinetics of important antibiotics in ICU patients with pneumonia to define optimal dosing regimens that maximise therapeutic outcomes. Specific objectives 1. To describe the population pharmacokinetics of benzylpenicillin, ceftriaxone, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam (in plasma, epithelial lining fluid and urine) in ICU patients with pneumonia. 2. To design optimised dosing regimens for benzylpenicillin, ceftriaxone, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam that maximise the achievement of effective epithelial lining fluid exposures in ICU patients with pneumonia. 3. To characterise the effects of beta-lactam antibiotic (benzylpenicillin, ceftriaxone, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam) exposures in epithelial lining fluid on lung inflammation in ICU patients with pneumonia. General design: This study is a prospective, open-labeled, multi-centre pharmacokinetic study, which is designed to develop an individualised and optimal dosing regimen for benzylpenicillin, ceftriaxone, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam in ICU patients with pneumonia. Patient recruitment: An ICU patient who is receiving either benzylpenicillin, ceftriaxone, meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam for confirmed/suspected community-acquired pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia, aspiration pneumonia or a clinically diagnosed lung infection, who meets all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be considered for study participation. Study antibiotics The study antibiotics include: 1. Benzylpenicillin 2. Ceftriaxone 3. Meropenem 4. Piperacillin/tazobactam Antibiotic dose and dosing interval will be determined by the treating clinician in accordance to standard prescribing practices based on clinical assessment of the patient. This study aims to recruit at least 20 participants per antibiotic. Study procedures: For each antibiotic, samples of blood, epithelial lining fluid and urine will be collected over one dosing interval (within the specified sampling times and time-points) on two separate occasions; Occasion 1, between Days 1 - 3 of antibiotic therapy and Occasion 2, between Days 3 - 6 of antibiotic therapy. Blood sampling: During a single dosing interval, each participant will have 1 - 8 blood samples taken for each antibiotic. Blood samples (3 mL each) will be drawn from an existing arterial line or central venous catheter into heparinised tubes within the specified sampling times and time-points, in accordance with the method of antibiotic administration and dosing interval (i.e. intermittent infusion, extended infusion or continuous infusion). Epithelial lining fluid sampling: Epithelial lining fluid will be sampled using either a bronchoalveolar lavage or mini-bronchoalveolar lavage technique, in accordance with the preferred procedure in participating sites. Where possible, epithelial lining fluid sampling will be performed on the same days and times as the blood sampling. Three bronchoalveolar lavage or mini-bronchoalveolar lavage samples will be collected over the two sampling occasions; Occasion 1, between Days 1 - 3 of antibiotic therapy and Occasion 2, between Days 3 - 6 of antibiotic therapy. Urine sampling: The total urine volume over the duration of the dosing interval will be collected on the two sampling occasions for a calculated urinary creatinine clearance measurement. Inflammatory cytokines/mediators in blood and epithelial lining fluid: Quantification of systemic and lung inflammation by measuring inflammatory cytokines/mediators such as C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-8 (IL-8), procalcitonin (PCT) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in blood and epithelial lining fluid will occur on sampling Occasion 1 and then again on Occasion 2. These samples will be used to determine CRP, IL-8, PCT and TNF-α, CRP and PCT levels. Microbiological cultures: Bronchoalveolar lavage, blood or urine samples sent to the microbiology laboratory for culture as part of routine clinical care will be used to identify relevant causative organism(s) and drug susceptibility. Isolates of the identified causative organism will be transferred to the reference microbiological laboratory, University Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR) at the University of Queensland so that the organism's minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) can be determined using the broth microdilution and/or epsilometer test (Etest) methods, depending on clinical usage at the time of analysis. Bioanalysis: Total and free drug concentrations in epithelial lining fluid, plasma and urine will be measured by a validated ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method on a Nexera2 UHPLC system coupled to a 8050 triple quadruple mass spectrometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). Bioanalysis will be conducted in accordance with U.S FDA guidance for industry on bioanalysis. Inflammatory cytokine/mediators will be measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Bioanalysis of samples will be conducted by Central Bioanalysis Laboratory at UQCCR, the University of Queensland. Data collection: Data collection will be performed by trained personnel in the ICU and the data will be entered into an electronic case report form. The following parameters/variables will be collected from the patient medical record: (1) baseline variables; (2) ICU-related variables; (3) microbiological data; and (4) post-ICU variables (e.g. clinical cure on day of cessation of study antibiotic or at Day 14 post-enrolment). Pharmacometric analysis plan Primary pharmacokinetic parameters (volume of distribution, Vd and clearance, CL) will be estimated. An attempt will be made to correlate any differences in these primary pharmacokinetics parameters between patients, with clinical and demographic characteristics of the patient. Variability in antibiotic dosing, infusion rates and sampling times will be accounted for by pharmacometric analyses and the software used to perform the analysis. Different dosing regimens, with various degrees of organ function and clinical characteristics, required to attain therapeutic concentrations at the site of infection will be evaluated using Monte Carlo dosing simulations.