Tobacco use disorder is a chronic disease. This is particularly true for people living with mental illness, who are more likely to smoke and make more unsuccessful quit attempts than those without. The current study is designed to test a package of two chronic disease management strategies to treatment tobacco in community mental health centers: regular provider interventions during routine mental healthcare visits, and proactive outreach by community mental health center staff to offer connections to tobacco cessation treatment. In study 1 we will interview patients, providers and leaders across wo community healthcare systems, in study 2 we will pilot test the package of interventions in 25 patients at a community mental health center for feasibility and acceptability. in Study 3, 50 patients at a community mental health center will receive provider intervention at their regular visits as well as 3 outreach calls over 9 months from trained staff to offer to connect them with stop smoking treatment. The investigators will measure the effect of these interventions on tobacco use over the next year.
BACKGROUND: The US Public Health Service (USPHS) designated tobacco dependence as a chronic disease. This is especially true for smokers with serious mental illness (SMI) who make more cessation attempts and are less successful sustaining long-term abstinence than the general population. There is a significant health disparity wherein individuals with SMI have a higher tobacco use prevalence and a greater risk for tobacco-related mortality than the general population. Chronic care models suggest chronic disease management requires a multidisciplinary care team to assess tobacco use, administer treatment, support patient self-management, and monitor progress. Proactive telephone outreach to smokers and brief provider interventions are two effective chronic disease management strategies. Community based mental health centers (CMHCs) are a primary treatment access point for many smokers with SMI. However, rates of intervention with smoking by CMHC providers are low. In order to implement the chronic care model for tobacco dependence for CMHCs, comprehensive implementation strategies are needed. OBJECTIVE: to conduct a feasibility pilot trial to adapt an implementation strategy developed by the SAMHSA-funded network of Addiction Technology Transfer Centers (ATTCs) to integrate a proactive, chronic care model of tobacco cessation treatment into CMHCs. AIM: To conduct a pilot trial to assess the feasibility, acceptability and initial effectiveness of the implementation strategy. DESIGN: The investigators will conduct 3 studies. The first study will include qualitative interviews of 29 individuals including patients, providers and leaders. Study 2 will be a pilot test of the study intervention. 25 patients will receive the intervention for 3 months the primary outcome is feasibility and acceptability as measured 3 months post intervention. Study 3 is a pilot hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness trial in 3 CMHCs (N=50 patients; 96-130 providers). The investigators will conduct 2 baseline assessments (3 months apart) and outcomes will be assessed at 3, 6, and 12-months post implementation. Outcomes include feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness of the implementation strategy on tobacco cessation treatment utilization (counseling and medication) and patient effectiveness on tobacco cessation (CO confirmed 7-day point prevalence abstinence). SIGNIFICANCE: An effective implementation strategy for tobacco cessation treatment in CMHCs, a widespread model of care delivery, would have enormous public health impact.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
94
Quarterly brief provider intervention (the 5As) and 3 quarterly outreach calls over 9 months.
Providers trained in brief provider intervention and 1 outreach call over 3 months.
Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Study 3: Smoking Abstinence
number of participants who reported 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence (no smoking past 7 days) and a expired air CO value of \<6ppm in study 3 only
Time frame: 1 year post baseline
Study 1: Perceived Feasibility of Intervention
Number of participants who reported the proposed intervention was feasible
Time frame: interview (up to 30 minutes at study visit)
Study 1: Perceived Acceptability of Intervention
number of participants who agreed the proposed intervention was acceptable.
Time frame: interview (up to 30 minutes at study visit)
Studies 2 & 3: Feasibility of Recruitment
Number of participants recruited (goal for study 2=25; goal for study 3=50)
Time frame: baseline
Studies 2 & 3: Feasibility of Retention
% of participants completing follow-up in studies 2 \& 3
Time frame: 3 months post enrollment
Study 2: Perceived Acceptability of Intervention
Number of participants who perceived that the intervention was acceptable drawn from qualitative reports of intervention acceptability from selected patients (N=5) and providers and leaders (N=4)
Time frame: 3 months post enrollment
Study 3: Smoking Abstinence
30 day prolonged abstinence (no smoking past 30 days prior to 1 year follow-up)
Time frame: 1 year post baseline
Study 3: Quit Attempts
Number of 24 hour intentional quit attempts
Time frame: 1 year post-baseline
Study 3: Cigarettes Per Day
number of cigarettes smoked per day in study 3
Time frame: 12 months post baseline
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.