Purposes: This study was set out to measure the effectiveness of constructive debriefing on procedural skills and satisfaction of nursing students in the low-fidelity context in comparison to traditional debriefing. Method: The randomized controlled (Parallel double blinded) trial design was used. Participant: Out of 51 approached, 34 students were selected from the list of participants by a data collector using simple random sampling technique. Following, block randomization was applied using Microsoft Excel to create two equivalent (n=17) groups i.e. experimental and non-experimental. Setting: The study was conducted in private college of nursing Islamabad Pakistan Intervention: The experimental group received constructive debriefing and non-experimental group received the traditional debriefing. The data were collected using suctioning, sterile dressing skills checklist, and debriefing reflection subscale of Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
34
Constructive debriefing was applied to an interventional group Traditional debriefing was applied on noninterventional group
Bushra
Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
learning scores
learning scores of participant
Time frame: 8months
satisfaction level
measure satisfaction level of participant
Time frame: 8months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.