Clinical evaluation to compare performance of the physiological recordings from the Gastric Alimetry System vs a predicate reference device (Medtronic Polygram NET / Polygraf ID EGG System
A prospective, non-randomised, single centre investigation on patients with suspected motility disorders comprising a simultaneous head-to-head comparison of device performance between the Gastric Alimetry System and the Medtronic Polygram NET / Polygraf ID EGG System.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
25
Gastric Alimetry is a medical device intended to record, store, view and process gastric myoelectrical activity as an aid in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal motility disorders. The device is indicated for use during the diagnostic work-up of patients reporting gastric symptoms, who are suspected of having an underlying gastric motility problem.
Clinical Research Centre, Building 507, The University of Auckland
Auckland, New Zealand
Performance comparison (frequency) between Gastric Alimetry and predicate device
Mean frequency of raw data from predicate device compared with the same measure from the Gastric Alimetry System. Electrode placement is identical and recording is simultaneous.
Time frame: 90 minutes
Performance comparison (amplitude) between Gastric Alimetry and predicate device
Mean amplitude of raw data from predicate device (4 electrodes) compared with the same measure from the Gastric Alimetry System (4 electrodes). Electrode placement is identical and recording is simultaneous.
Time frame: 90 minutes
Performance comparison (amplitude) between Gastric Alimetry (4 channels as per Primary Outcome Measure) and Gastric Alimetry (8 highest amplitude electrodes).
Amplitude of raw data from Gastric Alimetry device (4 electrodes) compared with the same measure from the Gastric Alimetry System (8 electrodes with highest amplitude). Recording is simultaneous.
Time frame: 90 minutes
Safety Endpoint
Safety endpoint: no unanticipated AEs or ADEs, and anticipated AEs and ADEs are acceptable relative to the risk acceptability criteria, as defined by the risk acceptability matrix (RSK-010).
Time frame: Five hours
User Needs Endpoint
User needs validation results meet acceptability criteria.
Time frame: Five hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.