Probiotics efficacy is mainly assessed by subjective endpoints such as the FDA responder rate or global relief, which partly explain contradictory results obtained in clinical trials with probiotic bacteria. Objective biomarkers of IBS will allow to measure the efficacy of probiotics. In the case of IBS-C, serum resolvin-D1 appears to be an interesting candidate due to its non-invasive and discriminating character compared to a healthy population. It is, inversely correlated with the severity of symptoms. Resolvin-D1 modulates the duration and intensity of inflammation by regulating the transcription of cytokines, chemokines and their receptors as well as other proteins involved in inflammation. Resolvin D1 could serve as a predictor of probiotic response based on its baseline value.
Resolvin D1 levels will be measured in patients with IBS-C as defined by the Rome IV criteria before 6 and 12 weeks after supplementation with a mixture of probiotics. The progression of IBS-C symptoms will also be assessed throughout the study. The correlation with resolvin D1 levels and the severity of IBS symptoms will be investigated. The efficacy of the probiotic mixture in relieving the symptoms of IBS-C will be measured and compared based on the levels of resolvin D1.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
80
12 weeks of daily supplementation with 1 g of probiotics mixture (4.10exp9 colony forming unit/g) containing: * Bifidobacterium longum LA 101 * Lactobacillus helveticus La 102 * Lactococcus lactis LA 103 * Streptococcus thermophilus LA 104
CEN Nutriment
Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
Change of the severity of IBS-C symptoms
Measured by the composite IBS-SSS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Severity Scale Scoring) system, compared to the baseline IBS-SSS value. Minimum : 0 (best condition) to maximum (worse condition): 500
Time frame: At weeks 0, 4, 8 and 12
Change of the severity of addominal pain
Mesured by the Abdominal pain domain of the IBS-SSS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Severity Scale Scoring) score compared to the baseline. Minimum (best condition) : 0 to maximum (worse condition): 100
Time frame: At weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change of the number of days with abdominal pain
Mesured by the Number of days with abdominal pain domain of the IBS-SSS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Severity Scale Scoring) score compared to the baseline. Minimum (best condition) : 0 to maximum (worse condition): 100
Time frame: At weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change of the severity of abdominal distension (bloating)
Mesured by the bloating-distension domain of the IBS-SSS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Severity Scale Scoring) score compared to the baseline. Minimum (best condition) : 0 to maximum (worse condition): 100
Time frame: At weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change of the satisfaction with bowel habits
Mesured by the satisfaction with bowel habits domain of the IBS-SSS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Severity Scale Scoring) score compared to the baseline. Minimum (best condition) : 0 to maximum (worse condition): 100
Time frame: At weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change of the IBS-related quality of life
Mesured by the IBS related quality of life domain of the IBS-SSS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Severity Scale Scoring) score compared to the baseline. Minimum (best condition) : 0 to maximum (worse condition): 100
Time frame: At weeks 4, 8 and 12
Global assessment of symptoms relief
Measured by the Subject's Global Assessment (SGA) of Relief, compared to the baseline
Time frame: At weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change of Resolvin-D1 levels
Blood measurement of resolvin-D1 compared to the baseline
Time frame: At weeks 8 and 12
Change of CPRu (C Reactive Protein-ultrasensitive) levels
Blood measurement of C Reactive Protein ultrasensitive compared to the baseline
Time frame: At weeks 8 and 12
Change of the intestinal microbiota
Biological parameter : Fecal microbiota measured by 16S rRNA gene sequencing compared to baseline
Time frame: At weeks 6 and 12
Change of the stool frequency
Patient-reported number of stools using an e-diary, compared to baseline
Time frame: At weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12
Change of the stools consistency
Patient-reported stools consistency by the Bristol Stool Scale, using an e-diary, compared to baseline
Time frame: At weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12
Change of the Quality of Life
Measured by Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey Short Form-12 compared to baseline
Time frame: At weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change of number of drugs consumption to alleviate the IBS-C symptoms
Patient-reported drug (laxative, spasmolytics) consumption using an e-diary, compared to baseline
Time frame: At weeks 4, 8 and 12
Assessing the relationship between resolvin D1 levels and symptoms severity mesured by IBS-SSS symptoms scores
Regression analysis
Time frame: At week 12
Assessing the relationship between baseline resolvin D1 levels and response to the probiotics supplementation measured by the responders rate (outcome 17)
Regression analysis
Time frame: At week 12
Assessing the responders rate
Number of patients with a decrease in the weekly average of worst abdominal pain in the past 24 hours score (measured daily) of at least 30 percent compared with baseline weekly average and a stool Frequency Weekly Responder is defined as a patient who experiences an increase of at least one complete stool bowel movement per week from baseline.
Time frame: At weeks 4, 8 and 12
Assessing the relationship between baseline microbiota and response to the probiotics supplementation measured by the responders rate (outcome 17)
Regression analysis
Time frame: At week 12
Assessing the tolerance of the probiotics mixture
Adverse reactions analysis
Time frame: At weeks 6 and 12
Assessing the global improvement
Measured by the patient global impression of improvement
Time frame: At weeks 4, 8 and 12
Assessing the satisfaction regarding the mixture of probiotics
Measured by a 5 points Likert scale 0 : worse satisfaction to 5 : better satisfaction
Time frame: At weeks 4, 8 and 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.