MANTRA is a prospective, multiple-arm, multi-center, global, post-market clinical follow-up study. The main objective is to monitor ongoing safety and performance of the CORCYM devices and accessories used for aortic, mitral and tricuspid valvular diseases in a real-world setting. Corcym S.r.l., is a medical device manufacturer with a broad product portfolio for cardiac surgeons, offering solutions for the treatment of aortic, mitral and tricuspid valve disease. The MANTRA Master Plan (Master Protocol) is intended as an overarching Umbrella Protocol that allows multiple sub-studies to be added, as needed. The Umbrella Master Protocol concept offers an excellent solution to provide post-marketing clinical follow-up information on the entire cardiac surgery heart valve portfolio of the sponsor in a common database, including corelab assessment of hemodynamic and structural performance, annular motion and Dynamics for one of the products. Currently, three sub-studies are planned: * MANTRA - Aortic Sub-Study * MANTRA - Mitral/Tricuspid Sub-Study (Excluding Memo 4D) * MANTRA - Memo 4D Sub-Study
The MANTRA Master Plan (Master Protocol) is intended as an overarching Umbrella Protocol that allows multiple substudies to be added, as needed. The Umbrella Master Protocol concept offers an excellent solution to provide post-marketing clinical follow-up information on the entire cardiac surgery heart valve portfolio of the sponsor in a common database. Currently, three substudies are planned: * MANTRA - Aortic Sub-Study * MANTRA - Mitral/Tricuspid Sub-Study (excluding Memo 4D) * MANTRA - Memo 4D Sub-Study The aim of the studies assembled under the master protocol is the continued collection of safety and performance data during heart valve procedures and the relevant follow-up visits in subjects where any of the CORCYM devices and accessories are used in a real-world setting, in accordance with the IFUs, and at the discretion of the investigator. MANTRA study is expected to enroll approximately 2150 subjects in up to 130 sites worldwide: * Approximately 1650 subjects considered suitable for treatment with a CORCYM aortic device * Approximately 300 subjects considered suitable for treatment with a CORCYM mitral and/or tricuspid device (excluding Memo 4D) * Approximately 200 subjects considered suitable for treatment with Memo 4D Expected enrollment duration may vary across the different projects. Subject follow-up is planned at discharge, 30 days after implantation and then annually up to 10 years. Sites can choose to participate in one or more sub-studies. All available data shall be gathered during standard medical care. At a minimum, the following data will be collected: * Informed Consent * Screening/Baseline data, including demographics and medical history * Procedural data * Hospitalization and Discharge data * Follow-up data: 30 days and annually up to 10 years post procedure * Serious Adverse Event and Device Deficiencies information As part of the study, the subject will be asked to complete quality of life questionnaire(s) at baseline, 30 days and at 1-year follow-up. In addition, for the MEMO 4D sub-study only, an Echocardiography Core Laboratory has been appointed by the Sponsor to assess the hemodynamic and structural performance, annular motion and dynamics, and 3D echocardiogram images (transesophageal during the procedure and transthoracic during follow up) will be collected for Corelab readings.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
2,150
St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
RECRUITINGOchsner Clinic Foundation
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
RECRUITINGMaine Medical Center
Portland, Maine, United States
WITHDRAWNDuke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
The primary endpoint in the AORTIC Sub-study is number and percentage of subjects with Device Success
Device success at 30 days (+14 days) based on VARC-3, defined as: * Technical success * Freedom from mortality * Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related or cardiac structural complication * Intended performance of the valve (mean gradient\<20 mmHg and less than moderate aortic regurgitation) The number and percentage of subjects with device success at 30 days as per VARC-3 definition, along with individual component of the success, will be presented.
Time frame: 30 days
The primary endpoint in the MITRAL/TRICUSPID Sub-study is number and percentage of subjects with Device Success
Device success at 30 days (+14 days) based on MVARC, defined as: * Procedural mortality or stroke AND * Proper placement and positioning of the device AND * Freedom from unplanned surgical or interventional procedures related to the device or access procedure AND * Continued intended safety and performance of the device, including: * Evidence of structural or functional failure * Specific device-related technical failure issues and complications * MITRAL: Reduction of Mitral Regurgitation (MR) to either optimal or acceptable levels (site-reported) * TRICUSPID: Reduction of Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) to either optimal or acceptable levels (site-reported) Number and percentage of subjects with device success, along with individual component, will be presented.
Time frame: 30 days
The primary endpoint in the MEMO 4D Sub-study is number and percentage of subjects with Device Success
Device success at 30 days (+14 days) based on the MVARC, defined as: * Procedural mortality or stroke; AND * Proper placement and positioning of the device; AND * Freedom from unplanned surgical or interventional procedures related to the device or access procedure; AND * Continued intended safety and performance of the device, including: * Evidence of structural or functional failure * Specific device-related technical failure issues and complications * Reduction of Mitral Regurgitation (MR) to either optimal or acceptable levels without significant mitral stenosis (i.e., post-procedure EOA is ≥ 1.5 cm2 with a transmitral gradient \<5 mmHg), and with no greater than mild MR core-lab assessed The number and percentage of subjects with device success at 30 days as per MVARC definition, along with individual component of the success, will be presented.
Time frame: 30 days
Mortality (all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, device related mortality)
Number of patients with this event
Time frame: up to 10 years from implant
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE - composite endpoint of all cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and valve re-intervention)
Number of patients with this event
Time frame: up to 10 years from implant
Re-hospitalization (all-cause re-hospitalization, cardiovascular re-hospitalization, device related re-hospitalization)
Number of patients with this event
Time frame: up to 10 years from implant
Technical success
Technical success, defined as successful delivery, correct positioning and deployment of the first intended device intraoperatively
Time frame: intraoperatively
Clinical Efficacy (AORTIC sub-study)
Clinical Efficacy according to VARC-3 guidelines
Time frame: 12 months
Valve-related long-term clinical efficacy
Valve-related long-term clinical according to VARC-3 guidelines
Time frame: at 5 years and up to 10 years
Bioprosthetic Valve Dysfunction (BVD), including Structural Valve Deterioration (SVD), Non structural valve dysfunction (NSVD), Thrombosis and Endocarditis
Number of patients with this event
Time frame: up to 10 years from implant
Patient outcome (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12); and EQ-5D-5L (in patients treated with Perceval Plus)
Quality of life improvement from baseline up to 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
East Carolina University
Greenville, North Carolina, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity Hospitals Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
RECRUITINGCleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
RECRUITINGLankenau Institute for Medical Research
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGInnsbruck Medical University
Innsbruck, Austria
RECRUITING...and 42 more locations
Time frame: 12 months
Patient outcome (New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification)
Change of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class from baseline up to 12 months after implant, and at each subsequent follow-up
Time frame: up to 10 years from implant
Hemodynamic and structural performance
Main hemodynamic parameters will be collected according to the different indications (Aortic, Mitral and Tricuspid)
Time frame: up to 10 years from implant