The Safety of Repurposing Daratumumab for Relapsed or Refractory Autoimmune Antibody Mediated Hemolytic Anemia

Overview

A single-arm study utilizing a 6 x 4 expansion design using daratumumab SC treatment for patients with refractory Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia.

Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (AIHA) is a hematologic disorder in which the red blood cells are targeted and destroyed by autoantibodies produced by the immune system, specifically B-cells and plasma cells. It can be either idiopathic, or secondary to other autoimmune conditions, but is commonly related to lymphoproliferative disorders such as CLL or indolent lymphomas. It is a rather uncommon condition, which affects an estimated 17 people per 100,000 in their lifetime. Unfortunately, AIHA is often difficult to treat. The goal of treatment is to achieve and maintain a Hemoglobin concentration of above 10 g/dL. Treatment historically involves the use of relatively high doses of steroids (i.e. 1 mg/kg), followed by a prolonged taper. According to a review article, 80% of patients initially respond to corticosteroid therapy, but steroids alone do not frequently "cure" the disorder, as steroids do not eliminate the anti-RBC antibody producing clone. In fact, only 20% of patients treated with first line steroid therapy are cured, and 15-20% of patients require maintenance Prednisone doses above 15 mg per day. This puts patients at risk of long-term steroid side effects, including infections, osteoporosis, aseptic joint necrosis, diabetes and hypertension. The discovery of rituximab improved outcomes for AIHA. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody against CD20, a marker for B-cells, that is now approved in both the first-line setting as well as relapsed/ refractory AIHA. It works by depleting CD20-positive B-cells that produce the autoantibody. Early studies have shown that adding rituximab to steroids as first line treatment improved outcomes compared to steroids alone. In one study, a similar number of patients responded to rituximab and steroid, compared to steroid alone, but the length of response was significantly improved for the rituximab arm. Among responders, at 36 months, 70% vs 45% of patients treated in the combination arm vs steroids alone were still in remission. However, despite these advances, some patients either fail to respond to the rituximab (20-30%), or have to remain on unacceptably high doses of steroid to control their hemolysis. In addition, many relapse after rituximab therapy. At that point, splenectomy is commonly recommended, but this only has a cure rate of 20%, is invasive, and comes with long-term sequelae of risks of clots and infection. After splenectomy, patients are left with a host of other immunosuppressants, such as azathioprine, mycophenolate, cyclosporine, or cyclophosphamide, but these typically require long term usage, and have poor side effect profiles (infection, liver toxicity, renal toxicity, lymphoma, etc), and are often ineffective. Given the need for therapeutic options for patients with refractory or relapsed AIHA who have already received treatment with steroids and rituximab, this study proposes use of daratumumab therapy in this patient population. Daratumumab is a CD38-directed cytolytic monoclonal antibody and is approved for use in patients with multiple myeloma. CD38 is an attractive target in AIHA, because it is expressed not only on B-cells, but also on plasma cells, which rituximab does not target (see figure below for the evolution of CD markers in B-cell maturation). CD38+ plasma cells may be an important source of resistance to rituximab, as they can survive a long time and continue to produce the anti- red blood cell (RBC) antibodies. In support of the investigator hypothesis, a case report study of three post-allogeneic transplant patients with AIHA refractory to steroids, rituximab, and proteosome inhibition, treated with daratumumab indicated promising results. Two out of the three patients were cured while the third patient had a transient response and relapsed eight months later. Similar results have been reported by other institutions, again in case report form. In addition, daratumumab has also been successfully utilized for refractory Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) in the post-transplant setting. Additionally, here at Dartmouth clinicians have a short history of off labeled use in a 20 year old male with refractory Evans Syndrome, involving AIHA, ITP, and autoimmune neutropenia. Over the years, he had received multiple lines of immunosuppressant agents, but he was refractory to or relapsed quickly after all treatments. Based on the above literature, the Hematology team tried daratumumab, which produced a dramatic improvement in all cell lines within 2 weeks. He was then transferred to the National Institute of Health, where he received an allogeneic stem cell transplant, which would not have been possible without first gaining control over his autoimmune cytopenias with the use of daratumumab therapy. The investigators of this trial have found daratumumab SC to be safe and very tolerable in the treatment of Multiple Myeloma. Given the strong scientific rationale to support the use of daratumumab in treating patients with relapsed/refractory AIHA, this trial aims to study the safety of daratumumab in this new patient population. The investigators expect to demonstrate safety of daratumumab treatment in patients with AIHA, and to observe clinical response, which will support future larger-scale clinical trials. As mentioned previously, daratumumab SC has been studied and approved in multiple myeloma and light chain amyloidosis. Of note, the literature reports different pharmacokinetics in each disease; this is thought to perhaps be reflective of a varying burden of plasma cells between the diseases. The half-life associated with the linear clearance of daratumumab is 20 days in patients with multiple myeloma and 28 days in patients with light chain amyloidosis, according to the Darsalex Faspro product label. The pharmacokinetics of daratumumab in patients with relapsed/refractory AIHA is unknown and may differ from other indications where daratumumab is used. To study this, the investigators will measure daratumumab levels at baseline, weekly before treatments, and then at time points 14 and 28 days after the last dose. The serum Cmin (Ctrough) concentrations of daratumumb will be measured in the Clinical Pharmacology Shared Resource using the commercially available the ELISA assay (Eagle Biosciences). Appropriate modeling using WinNonLn pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) software will be used to determine primary pharmacokinetic parameter and explore PK-PD using non-linear models such as the Sigmoid Emax model. Also, because the investigator hypothesis is based on the investigator expectation that daratumumab will kill the plasma cells responsible for producing the anti-RBC antibodies, the investigators will also measure the anti-RBC antibody levels at baseline, at week 6 of treatment, and then at 3 months after the last dose; RBC antibody levels will be compared to clinical response to evaluate potential correlation. The investigators do appreciate that daratumumab does bind to RBCs via low expression of CD38 on RBCs. However, the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center Blood Bank Director believes that by pretreating the test cells to remove CD38, the investigators can effectively remove the daratumumab from the specimen, and therefore proceed to use dilutional methods to quantify the anti-RBC level.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes