This study compares the efficacy and safety of sulodexide (Vessel) to placebo in patients with chronic venous disease of the lower extremities. The primary hypothesis is that more patients will achieve a decrease in rVCSS score of at least 4 points with sulodexide than with placebo.
Chronic venous disease (CVD) prevalence is increasing in developed countries. The frequency reported in different sources ranges between 10 and 50% of the population and its rise is expected resulting from the overall aging of the population. The most common symptoms of Chronic venous disease of lower extremities include, increased limb fatigue, heaviness and swelling, pain, cramps, itching, and trophic skin changes that can result in a venous ulcer. CVD has a significant impact on the patient's quality of life and their work productivity. Conservative treatment consists of lifestyle measures, compression therapy and use of venoactive drugs (venopharmaceuticals). Venoactive drugs are a heterogenous group of compounds with various mechanisms of action, such as increasing venous wall tonus, reducing capillary fragility and permeability, increasing capillary resistance, and improving lymphatic drainage. The goal of the treatment is anti-oedematous action, improvement of trophism of affected tissues, reduction of subjective symptoms, swelling of the limbs and affecting related trophic skin changes which leads to the increase of quality of life. Sulodexide has protective effect on the endothelium, antithrombotic, fibrinolytic and anti-inflammatory effects. In the last 20 years, it has been well established in the common practice and its efficacy and safety have been demonstrated notably in the treatment of venous diseases such as post-thrombotic syndrome of the lower extremities, secondary prevention of deep and superficial venous thrombosis, supportive treatment of leg venous ulceration, ischemic disease of the lower limbs; symptomatic therapy of intermittent claudication, treatment of diabetic ulcers and microcirculation disorders of various aetiology. Patients with CVD were shown to respond quickly to sulodexide therapy in single arm observational studies. Sulodexide seems to provide both symptomatic and causal therapy. The aim of the present study is to provide the first high-level (causal) evidence on the efficacy and safety of sulodexide across the whole spectrum of patients suffering from symptomatic primary CVD (CEAP classification C2S to C6S).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
290
Sulodexide has protective effect on the endothelium, antithrombotic, fibrinolytic and anti-inflammatory effects. In the last 20 years, it has been well established in the common practice and its efficacy and safety have been demonstrated notably in the treatment of venous diseases such as post-thrombotic syndrome of the lower extremities, secondary prevention of deep and superficial venous thrombosis, supportive treatment of leg venous ulceration, ischemic disease of the lower limbs; symptomatic therapy of intermittent claudication, treatment of diabetic ulcers and microcirculation disorders of various aetiology. Patients with CVD were shown to respond quickly to sulodexide therapy in single arm observational studies. Sulodexide seems to provide both symptomatic and causal therapy.
Placebo and no compression or venopharmaceutical regimen
CardioVasc s.r.o.
Mladá Boleslav, Central Bohemia, Czechia
RECRUITINGRevised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS)
A minimal decrease in rVCSS score by 4 points will be considered a clinically significant response to treatment.
Time frame: 24 weeks of treatment
Revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS)
A minimal decrease in rVCSS score by 4 points will be considered a clinically significant response to treatment.
Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment
Volume in lower limb
The decrease of lower limb volume of at least 30 mL will be determined using water displacement leg volumetry and will be considered a clinically significant response to treatment.
Time frame: 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Decrease in mean pain on Visual Analogue Scale.
Time frame: 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI questionnaire)
Increase in mean work productivity in WPAI questionnaire.
Time frame: 8 and 24 weeks of treatment
EQ-5D questionnaire
Increase in the mean generic quality of life in EQ-5D questionnaire.
Time frame: 8 and 24 weeks of treatment
Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality of Life (CIVIQ-20 questionnaire)
Increase in the mean disease-specific quality of life in CIVIQ-20 questionnaire.
Time frame: 8 and 24 weeks of treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Oblastní nemocnice Mladá Boleslav, a.s.
Mladá Boleslav, Central Bohemia, Czechia
RECRUITINGPhlebomedica s.r.o.
Říčany, Central Bohemia, Czechia
RECRUITINGAngionika s.r.o.
Slaný, Central Bohemia, Czechia
RECRUITINGCor et Vasa s.r.o
Český Těšín, Moravskoslezský kraj, Czechia
RECRUITINGAngiologická ambulance s.r.o.
Hlučín, Moravskoslezský kraj, Czechia
TERMINATEDAngiologie Opava s.r.o.
Opava, Moravskoslezský kraj, Czechia
RECRUITINGPedicor s.r.o.
Ostrava, Moravskoslezský kraj, Czechia
RECRUITINGPéče o cévy s.r.o.
Ostrava, Moravskoslezský kraj, Czechia
RECRUITINGChirurgická ambulance MUDr. Prokop
Ostrava, Moravskoslezský kraj, Czechia
TERMINATED...and 9 more locations
Mean time of clinically significant worsening rVCSS
Mean time of worsening the rVCSS score since study initiation of at least 4 points. The difference will be visualized using Kaplan-Meier estimates and tested using Cox proportional-hazards models.
Time frame: 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment
Compression therapy initiation
Mean time of duration of initiation of compression therapy since study initiation. The difference will be visualized using Kaplan-Meier estimates and tested using Cox proportional-hazards models.
Time frame: 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment