Every year, almost 800,000 people experience a stroke in the United States, which lead to upper-limb impairments, making recovery of motor function a priority in stroke rehabilitation. 1) The primary objective of this study is to determine whether fast arm movement training on a tracking task ("Speed-training"), in chronic stroke survivors with mild to moderate paresis, will generalize to improve arm function better than dose-equivalent accuracy training on the same task. 2) study the effect of intensive arm training on the recovery of anticipatory feedforward control. 3) Determine the involvement of cerebellar-cortical circuits in the recovery of arm movements due to speed training.
About 65% of stroke survivors experience long-term limitations in upper extremity (UE) functions. In particular, limitations in arm reaching movements are prominent and correlate strongly with patients' impairment levels. Because activities of daily living often involve the UEs, retraining reach and grasp skills is critical for return to a full quality-of-life. Yet, the training parameters required for effective rehabilitation of UE function are not known. Recent evidence suggests that high-speed movements during training are effective at improving arm movements in individuals with chronic stroke. Hence, fast movements generating large errors, would promote the restoration of the feedforward controllers and therefore improves arm movements and UE functions in individuals with chronic stroke. Because the cerebellum is involved in learning feedforward controllers from motor errors, the improvements would be proportional to the integrity of the cerebellar-cortical networks. A double-blind quasi-randomized controlled study will be carried out in chronic post-stroke survivors. Participants will be assigned to either the speed-bias training group or a dose equivalent accuracy-bias training group (control) and will receive 4 days of training over a 1week period by a trained Occupational or physical therapist. Behavioral, EMG, and MRI data will be acquired within two weeks before, 3 days post, and one month after intervention.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
44
This intervention is based on recent body of evidence that high-speed movements during training are effective at improving arm movements in individuals with chronic stroke.Participants will be rewarded for movements performed within a short amount of time.
This is an observation-only group. The training received in this group will be dose equivalent to the active group.
Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare
Pomona, California, United States
Change in arm reaching movement time.
Average movement time for 30 planar reaching movements to target arrayed on a planar workspace.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 days post-intervention
Change in movement smoothness
Average movement smoothness for 30 planar reaching movements to target arrayed on a planar workspace. Smoothness is computed by number of peaks in hand tangential velocity profiles of arm-reaching movements.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 days post-intervention
Change in speed Accuracy Trade-off
The investigators will compute the "Fitts" slope between "index of difficulty" of reaching movements and movement time, for targets at 3 distances and of 4 diameters.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 days post-intervention
Change in arm reaching movement time.
Average movement time for 30 planar reaching movements to target arrayed on a planar workspace.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1 month post-intervention
Change in movement smoothness
Average movement smoothness for 30 planar reaching movements to target arrayed on a planar workspace. Smoothness is computed by number of peaks in hand tangential velocity profiles of arm-reaching movements.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1 month post-intervention
Change in speed Accuracy Trade-off
The investigators will compute the "Fitts" slope between "index of difficulty" of reaching movements and movement time, for targets at 3 distances and of 4 diameters.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1 month post-intervention
Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
The ARAT assess specific changes in limb function among individuals who sustained a stroke.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 days post-intervention
Change in Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM)
A test of motor function for the arm that is most affected by the stroke.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 days post-intervention
Change in Box and Block test score (BBT)
The Box and Block Test (BBT) measures unilateral gross manual dexterity.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 days post-intervention
Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
The ARAT assess specific changes in limb function among individuals who sustained a stroke.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1 month post-intervention
Change in Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM)
A test of motor function for the arm that is most affected by the stroke.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1 month post-intervention
Change in Box and Block test score (BBT)
The Box and Block Test (BBT) measures unilateral gross manual dexterity.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1 month post-intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.