Objective: To evaluate the immediate clinical performance using FDI criteria in occlusal and proximal lesions restored with dual polymerization bulkfill composite resin. Materials and methods: Experimental, clinical, controlled, randomized, double-blind study. For the evaluation of Fill-up! (FU) will be clinically compared to the control groups of a conventional Tetric N-Ceram (TB) RBK and Filtek z350 (z350) conventional composite resin. The adhesive process will be carried out under absolute isolation, of selective etching of 37% orthophosphoric acid enamel before applying the respective adhesive according to the trademark of the composite resins. The evaluation will be to 30 days, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months using the modified FDI criteria of postoperative sensitivity, marginal staining, color, marginal adaptation and anatomy, being 1: Excellent, 2: Good, 3: Fair, 4: unsatisfactory and 5: unacceptable. The non-parametric Kruskal Wallis test and Friedman (95% significance) used to compare the criteria.
Prior to the removal of carious lesions, the tooth will be first anesthetized. The lesion areas will be prepared with a diamond rotary instrument (801G.FG.016, Jota AG Rotary Instruments - Switzerland) at high speed and under refrigeration with abundant water. Only damaged tissue conservatively removed. The corresponding measurements it recorded with a millimeter probe (Hu Friedy®, North Carolina, Chicago, USA). Prior to the insertion of the material, the sectional matrix system and the palodent type matrix system and with a wooden wedge will be used. The manufacturer's instructions for each brand of composite resin will be followed. It conditioned with 37% phosphoric acid only in enamel, wash for twice as long and dried. The corresponding adhesive will be used f Single Bond Universal adhesive (3M-Espe, ST. Paul, MN, USA) applied for the z350 group, Tetric N-Bond Universal adhesive (Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein) for TB group and One Coat adhesive (Còltene, Whaladent Inc.) for FBK group. In the case of the FBK group, a final layer of Brilliant EverGlow composite resin (Còltene, Whaladent inc) will be added. Figure 3 Photopolymerization procedures performed using an LED light source with a minimum power of 1,100 mW / cm2 (Bluephase Style, Ivoclar Vivadent, AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein). The centric and eccentric occlusal contacts were verified and adjusted. For the finishing and polishing of both protocols, flexible discs (3M ESPE, St. Paul, USA) and the Enhance system (Dentsply, Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil) were used.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
42
Remove caries and restore with resin composite
Patricio Vildosola Grez
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
Compare clinical performance restorations
Outcome measure is Clinical performance of composite resin restoration, Device for measurement is FDI system , Unit is Ranking system has 5 scores for each different criterion. Either restoration is clinically 1: excellent, 2: good, 3:sufficient, 4: unsatisfactory, 5: clinically poor.
Time frame: Baseline
Compare clinical performance restorations
Outcome measure is Clinical performance of composite resin restoration, Device for measurement is FDI system , Unit is Ranking system has 5 scores for each different criterion. Either restoration is clinically 1: excellent, 2: good, 3:sufficient, 4: unsatisfactory, 5: clinically poor.
Time frame: 6 months
Compare clinical performance restorations
Outcome measure is Clinical performance of composite resin restoration, Device for measurement is FDI system , Unit is Ranking system has 5 scores for each different criterion. Either restoration is clinically 1: excellent, 2: good, 3:sufficient, 4: unsatisfactory, 5: clinically poor.
Time frame: 12 months
Compare clinical performance restorations
Outcome measure is Clinical performance of composite resin restoration, Device for measurement is FDI system , Unit is Ranking system has 5 scores for each different criterion. Either restoration is clinically 1: excellent, 2: good, 3:sufficient, 4: unsatisfactory, 5: clinically poor.
Time frame: 18 months
Compare clinical performance restorations
Outcome measure is Clinical performance of composite resin restoration, Device for measurement is FDI system , Unit is Ranking system has 5 scores for each different criterion. Either restoration is clinically 1: excellent, 2: good, 3:sufficient, 4: unsatisfactory, 5: clinically poor.
Time frame: 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.