The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of setanaxib on alkaline phosphatase (ALP) at Week 24 in participants with PBC and with elevated liver stiffness and intolerance or inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
76
Change in ALP at Week 24 Compared to Baseline
Change in ALP at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, ratio of week 24 value to baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PROMIS Short Form-Fatigue 7b Daily
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 7b measures the severity of fatigue since waking. There are 7 questions, each scored between 1 and 5, with a total score between 7 to 35. A higher score indicates worse fatigue. This raw score is converted to a T score (a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a SD of 10).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) Fatigue
The Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)-Fatigue is a global index where subjects are asked to rate the severity of fatigue on a 5-point scale within the past 7 days, with choices of 1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe and 5=Very Severe. Higher scores indicate a worse assessment for fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Fatigue
The Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)-Fatigue is a 7-point scale reflecting a subject's rating of overall improvement where subjects are asked to rate their overall improvement with fatigue with 1=Very much improved, 2=Much improved, 3=Minimally improved, 4=No change, 5=Worse, 6=Much worse, 7=Very much worse. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome for change in fatigue.
Time frame: Week 24
Change in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PBC-40 Questionnaire (PBC 40) Fatigue Domain
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
UA Thomas D. Boyer Liver Institute
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
California Liver Research Institute
Pasadena, California, United States
University of California Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, United States
Gastroenterology Associates - Crystal River
Inverness, Florida, United States
University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine
Miami, Florida, United States
AdventHealth Transplant Institute
Orlando, Florida, United States
Advanced Research Institute, Inc.
Orlando, Florida, United States
Tampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, United States
Northwestern University
Evanston, Illinois, United States
...and 118 more locations
PBC-40 fatigue domain includes 11 item questions, items scores range from 1 to 5. The individual item scores are summed to obtain a total domain score (Range for fatigue domain: 11 to 55), high scores represent high impact and low scores indicate low impact of PBC on the quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change in Liver Stiffness at Week 24 Compared to Screening
Change in liver stiffness at Week 24 compared to Screening, as assessed by transient elastography (FibroScan®)
Time frame: Screening (Day -28) and Week 24
Change in Pruritus at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS)
WI-NRS is a daily patient-reported measure of itch intensity using an 11-point scale where 0=no itch and 10=worst itching imaginable. The WI-NRS score is calculated by averaging the daily WI-NRS scores before the visit date (inclusive). Higher scores indicate worse functioning for pruritus on the WI-NRS.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change in Pruritus at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PBC-40 Itch Domain
Pruritus was assessed by answering 3 questions on the PBC-40 Itch domain from 1 to 5, which was also summed to obtain a total domain score (range 3 to 15). A high score represents a high impact, and a low score indicates low impact of pruritus on the quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change in Pruritus at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PGIS Pruritus
PGIS-Pruritus is a global index where subjects are asked to rate the severity of pruritus on a 5-point scale within the past 7 days, with choices of 1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe and 5=Very Severe. Higher scores indicate a worse assessment for pruritus.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change in Pruritus at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PGIC Pruritus
The PGIC-Pruritus is a 7-point scale reflecting a subject's rating of overall improvement where subjects are asked to rate their overall improvement with fatigue with 1=Very much improved, 2=Much improved, 3=Minimally improved, 4=No change, 5=Worse, 6=Much worse, 7=Very much worse. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome for change in pruritus.
Time frame: Week 24
Changes in Markers of Cholestasis at Week 24
Changes in markers of cholestasis as assessed by proportion of patients at Week 24 with: * ALP reduction to \<1.67×ULN and total bilirubin ≤1×ULN and a ≥15% or ≥30% or ≥40% or ≥70% ALP reduction from Baseline, respectively * ALP reduction to \<1.5×ULN and total bilirubin ≤1×ULN and a ≥40% ALP reduction from Baseline * ALP \<1×ULN and total bilirubin ≤1×ULN * Total bilirubin \<0.6×ULN
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change in ALP at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, Where Setanaxib Doses Are Combined
Change in ALP at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, ratio of week 24 value to baseline value. Setanaxib doses are combined and the change from baseline is estimated using a mixed model-repeated measures approach with fixed factors for treatment, visit, log(baseline), treatment\*visit, and log(baseline)\*visit, subject is included as a random effect. The variance-covariance matrix is therefore not the same as in the three arm analysis, which causes treatment effects estimated in the placebo to group differ from those estimated in the analysis with three treatment arms.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PROMIS Short Form-Fatigue 7b Daily, Where Setanaxib Doses Are Combined
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 7b measures the severity of fatigue since waking. There are 7 questions, each scored between 1 and 5, with a total score between 7 to 35. A higher score indicates worse fatigue. This raw score is converted to a T score (a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a SD of 10). Setanaxib doses are combined and the change from baseline is estimated using a mixed model-repeated measures approach with fixed factors for treatment, visit, log(baseline), treatment\*visit, and log(baseline)\*visit, subject is included as a random effect. The variance-covariance matrix is therefore not the same as in the three arm analysis, which causes treatment effects estimated in the placebo to group differ from those estimated in the analysis with three treatment arms.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PBC-40 Questionnaire (PBC 40) Fatigue Domain, Where Setanaxib Doses Are Combined
PBC-40 fatigue domain includes 11 item questions, items scores range from 1 to 5. The individual item scores are summed to obtain a total domain score (Range for fatigue domain: 11 to 55), high scores represent high impact and low scores indicate low impact of PBC on the quality of life. Setanaxib doses are combined and the change from baseline is estimated using a mixed model-repeated measures approach with fixed factors for treatment, visit, log(baseline), treatment\*visit, and log(baseline)\*visit, subject is included as a random effect. The variance-covariance matrix is therefore not the same as in the three arm analysis, which causes treatment effects estimated in the placebo to group differ from those estimated in the analysis with three treatment arms.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change in Liver Stiffness at Week 24 Compared to Screening, Where Setanaxib Doses Are Combined
Change in liver stiffness at Week 24 compared to Screening, as assessed by transient elastography (FibroScan®). Setanaxib doses are combined and the change from baseline is estimated using a mixed model-repeated measures approach with fixed factors for treatment, visit, log(baseline), treatment\*visit, and log(baseline)\*visit, subject is included as a random effect. The variance-covariance matrix is therefore not the same as in the three arm analysis, which causes treatment effects estimated in the placebo to group differ from those estimated in the analysis with three treatment arms.
Time frame: Screening (Day -28) and Week 24