The study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind clinical trial that aims to investigate the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) on attack frequency and severity in patients with chronic cluster headache (CH). Study outline Month 1: Baseline. Establishment of a baseline profile of the participants CH attacks (severity, duration, medicine utilization etc), health-related quality of life (QoL) and symptoms of anxiety and depression. No active treatment. Follow-up visit after 30 days. Months 2-4: TENS period. All participants will receive TENS-treatment. Clinical follow-up visit by the end of month four. Months 5-7: Double-blinded, randomized experimental period. All participants will have an ONS-system (lead, impulse generator) implanted and will be randomized 1:1 to receive either 1) burst (paresthesia-free) ONS or 2) placebo (deactivated ONS system). Clinical follow-up visit by the end of month seven. Months 8-10: Open label period. All participants will receive tonic (conventional, paresthesia-inducing) ONS. Clinical follow-up visit by the end of month ten. During every study phase each participant will fill out a weekly electronic headache registration as well as answering questionnaires regarding health-related quality of life and symptoms of anxiety and depression before every follow-up visit.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
38
Stimulation intensity target of 60% of paresthesia threshold.
ONS system deactivated
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus N, Denmark
30% reduction in CH attack frequency with TENS- and ONS-treatment
Proportion of participants with a positive treatment outcome of a 30% reduction in CH attack frequency compared to baseline. A CH attack is here defined as any attack recognised by the patient as a CH attack.
Time frame: Primary evaluation through month 4 (TENS) and 7 (ONS, blinded)
Incidence of treatment-emerged adverse events [safety] in TENS treatment
Treatment related adverse events and adverse device effects will be registered on an ongoing basis. Serious events will be handled immediately.
Time frame: Evaluation at month 4
Incidence of treatment-emerged adverse events [safety] in ONS treatment
Treatment related adverse events and adverse device effects will be registered on an ongoing basis. Serious events will be handled immediately.
Time frame: Evaluation at month 7 (burst ONS) and 10 (tonic ONS)
30% reduction of pain intensity in CH attacks
Weekly self reported pain intensity on a numeric rating scale from 0-10 with 0 being "no pain" and 10 "the worst possible pain". Proportion of participants with a positive treatment outcome of a 30% reduction in pain intensity during CH attacks compared to baseline.
Time frame: Through month 4, 7 and 10
Feasibility of TENS as a predictor for the efficacy of ONS treatment
Comparison will be made of headache data from the last month of treatment with TENS and tonic ONS, respectively, to evaluate whether a 30% reduction in CH attack duration with TENS-treatment correlates to a 30% reduction in CH attack duration with ONS-treatment.
Time frame: Through month 4 and 10
Non-inferiority study: Burst ONS versus tonic ONS
Comparing treatment outcome of burst ONS and tonic ONS.
Time frame: Through month 7 and 10
Patient-perceived Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
The number of participants who rates their condition 'much improved' or 'very much improved' as assessed by PGIC.
Time frame: At month 4, 7 and 10
Reduction in background headache
Proportion of participants reporting a reduction in background headache. A positive treatment outcome will be defined as a two-point improvement on a four-point scale compared to baseline.
Time frame: At month 4, 7 and 10
Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)
HADS is a self-assessment questionnaire consisting of seven items each for depression and anxiety sub-scales. Scoring for each item ranges from zero to three, with three denoting highest anxiety or depression level. HADS score will be evaluated at every follow up and compared to baseline.
Time frame: At month 4, 7 and 10
Health-related quality of life (EuroQoL 5D-5L)
The EQ 5D-5L is a well-established measure of health-related quality of life that is quantified as a utility (a measure of quality of life between 0 and 1) based on a danish value set. Furthermore a total score that ranges from 0-100 (visual analog scale), a higher score indicates better health-related quality of life.
Time frame: At month 4, 7 and 10
Self reported sleep quality
Proportion af participants reporting a positive treatment outcome defined as a two-point improvement on a four-point scale compared to baseline.
Time frame: At month 4, 7 and 10
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.