Pediatric, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors (PAYA-CS) are at higher risk of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. This is a consequence of prior cancer-related therapies that have the potential of producing cardiac dysfunction, reducing cardiorespiratory fitness (reduced VO2peak) and psychosocial morbidities (i.e., anxiety and depression). A reduction of physical activity levels can evoke functional limitations resulting in a vicious cycle of reduced exercise tolerance and physical deterioration. To date, there is limited evidence on the use of non-pharmacological strategies such as Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation (CORE) including structured exercise, behavioural support and risk factor management to improve the outcomes of this underserved population. The HIMALAYAS study is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the impact of a CORE intervention (consisting of six-months home and onsite-based structured moderate to high-intensity aerobic exercise training and CVD risk factor management) on CV and psychosocial health, and the cardiovascular disease risk in PAYA-CS with mild heart dysfunction (stage B heart failure) compared to standard of care (i.e. providing guidance on the current exercise recommendations for cancer survivors). The primary objective of the HIMALAYAS study is to determine whether a six-month supervised CORE intervention, consisting of individualized moderate to high-intensity aerobic exercise training, CVD risk factor modification and enhanced online behavioral support, improves cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak; primary outcome), cardiac function, CVD risk factors and biomarkers, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at six- months follow-up compared to standard of care (CON) in PAYA-CS with stage B heart failure. The secondary objective is to assess the same outcomes at 12- and 24-months follow-up. We will recruit 336 patients across 5 sites in Canada and upto 134 patients at UHN in 3 years and conclude in 6 years.
Over 90,000 North Americans are diagnosed with cancer before the age of 40. Improved cancer therapies have led to an exponential growth in the number of pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors (AYA-CS) who are expected to live 50-60 years beyond diagnosis. However, AYA-CS are at increased risk of developing multiple cancer- and treatment-related morbidities including poor fitness (e.g., low VO2peak), hypertension (HTN), diabetes, and poor mental health, which all contribute to premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). The prevalence of CVD events (e.g. heart failure, heart attack, stroke) is up to 23.8% in adult survivors of pediatric cancers with long term follow-up after treatment. The incidence of subclinical CVD, which is a precursor to CVD events, is even higher in AYA-CS; up to 40%, 11%, and 5% experience subclinical cardiomyopathy measured by abnormal global longitudinal strain (GLS), diastolic dysfunction (DD) or mild reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), respectively, and 18% experience reduced aerobic fitness. The treatment of modifiable CVD risk factors must be considered a fundamental target for improving CVD health-related outcomes in AYA-CS. To this end, exercise and best-practices for CVD risk factor modification are integral to a cardiac rehabilitation model. Traditional cardiac rehabilitation models for patients with CVD (consisting of exercise, CVD risk factor treatment, and patient education) are safe and effective in improving HRQoL, morbidity, and mortality risk. However, by virtue of their age and low short-term CVD risk, AYA-CS do not meet traditional criteria for initiating cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and are less likely to receive treatments to reduce CVD risk. AYA-CS with stage B heart failure (SBHF): (1) are at high risk for subsequent HF/CVD death; (2) have lower cardiopulmonary fitness; and (3) are more likely to benefit from CVD risk factor management. Considering that AYA-CS have an estimated 33% prevalence of SBHF, this vulnerable cohort of cancer survivors represent an opportunity for intervention that is highly feasible and potentially impactful. Exercise is a preferred method for optimizing health and survival in PAYA-CS. However, we need models that safely and effectively deliver exercise interventions that meet the unique needs of this population. The cardio-oncology rehabilitation (CORE) model is an intervention that would provide AYA-CS with SBHF a supervised and home-based high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) exercise therapy, CVD risk factor modification, and behavioural support to reduce the risk of CVD. The primary objective of the HIMALAYAS study is to determine whether supervised CORE (Group 1A) improves cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak; primary outcome), cardiac function, CVD risk factors and biomarkers, and PROs at 6 months (primary timepoint) as well as 12 and 24 months compared to standard of care group control group (CON) in AYA-CS with SBHF. The secondary objective of the study is to assess the ongoing behavioural support strategy based on the exercise guidelines for cancer survivors (i.e. 90 to 150 minutes of moderate to vigorous PA per week) on VO2peak, cardiac function, CVD risk factors and biomarkers, and PROs at 24 months compared to standard of care \[CON\] in AYA-CS with SBHF. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, CORE intervention will involve a facility-based HIIT session and home-based HIIT session (described as "HIIT at Home") per week.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
336
Exercise therapy, CVD risk factor management for the first 6 months (as per current standards in CR models) and behavioural support for the entire 2-year intervention period
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGCardiorespiratory fitness
Assessed via cardiopulmonary exercise test and quantified as VO2peak
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Assessed via cardiopulmonary exercise test and quantified as VO2peak
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Ventilatory threshold
Estimated using the V-slope method and according to the following criteria: i) an exaggerated response in the volume of carbon-dioxide (i.e., VCO2) relative to the volume of oxygen (i.e., VO2), and ii) the first identifiable break-point in in the minute ventilation (i.e., VE/VO2 vs work rate relationship).
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Ventilatory threshold
Estimated using the V-slope method and according to the following criteria: i) an exaggerated response in the volume of carbon-dioxide (i.e., VCO2) relative to the volume of oxygen (i.e., VO2), and ii) the first identifiable break-point in in the minute ventilation (i.e., VE/VO2 vs work rate relationship).
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Anaerobic threshold
Estimated according to the three-criterion discrimination technique: i) an excess VCO2 response relative to the VO2 response identified per the modified V-slope criteria; ii) the VE/VO2 to VO2 relationship having been flat or decreasing begins to increase without returning to baseline; and iii) there is no reciprocal decrease in PETCO2 at the point where PETO2 starts to rise systematically.
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Anaerobic threshold
Estimated according to the three-criterion discrimination technique: i) an excess VCO2 response relative to the VO2 response identified per the modified V-slope criteria; ii) the VE/VO2 to VO2 relationship having been flat or decreasing begins to increase without returning to baseline; and iii) there is no reciprocal decrease in PETCO2 at the point where PETO2 starts to rise systematically.
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Post-exercise heart rate recovery
One-minute HR recovery (HRR; an index of post-exercise parasympathetic reactivation) will be calculated as the HR-difference between peak exercise and following one minute of quiet standing on the treadmill immediately post-test.
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Post-exercise heart rate recovery
One-minute HR recovery (HRR; an index of post-exercise parasympathetic reactivation) will be calculated as the HR-difference between peak exercise and following one minute of quiet standing on the treadmill immediately post-test.
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
Assessed via 2D and 3D echocardiography
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
Assessed via 2D and 3D echocardiography
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Global longitudinal strain (GLS)
Assessed via 2D echocardiography
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Global longitudinal strain (GLS)
Assessed via 2D echocardiography
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Early (E) and late (A) diastolic mitral inflow velocities and deceleration time
Assessed via echocardiography
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Early (E) and late (A) diastolic mitral inflow velocities and deceleration time
Assessed via echocardiography
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Early diastolic mitral septal and lateral annular velocities (e')
Assessed via tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Early diastolic mitral septal and lateral annular velocities (e')
Assessed via tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
TR velocity
Assess via spectral Doppler
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
TR velocity
Assess via spectral Doppler
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Left atrial volume
Assess via 2D echocardiography
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Left atrial volume
Assess via 2D echocardiography
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Diastolic function - E/e' ratio
Calculated using the average of the TDI septal and lateral annular velocities (e')
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Diastolic function - E/e' ratio
Calculated using the average of the TDI septal and lateral annular velocities (e')
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Left ventricular hypertrophy
Assessed via Devereux formula and quantified as LV mass/body surface area: \>95 g/m2 for women or \>115 g/m2 for men
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Left ventricular hypertrophy
Assessed via Devereux formula and quantified as LV mass/body surface area: \>95 g/m2 for women or \>115 g/m2 for men
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Concentric cardiac remodeling
Assessed as \>0.42 relative wall thickness
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Concentric cardiac remodeling
Assessed as \>0.42 relative wall thickness
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Resting heart rate
Measured with an average of 2 readings taken via ECG during the resting period during the cardiac screening procedures.
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Resting heart rate
Measured with an average of 2 readings taken via ECG during the resting period during the cardiac screening procedures.
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Calculated as average of 3 readings measured via automated sphygmomanometer per the Hypertension Canada guidelines.
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Calculated as average of 3 readings measured via automated sphygmomanometer per the Hypertension Canada guidelines.
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Apolipoprotein B
Assessed via blood serum sample
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Apolipoprotein B
Assessed via blood serum sample
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Total cholesterol
Assessed via blood serum sample
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Total cholesterol
Assessed via blood serum sample
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Low density lipoprotein
Assessed via blood serum sample
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Low density lipoprotein
Assessed via blood serum sample
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
High density lipoprotein
Assessed via blood serum sample
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
High density lipoprotein
Assessed via blood serum sample
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Whole body insulin sensitivity
Assessed via Matsuda index
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Whole body insulin sensitivity
Assessed via Matsuda index
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Hepatic insulin sensitivity
Assessed via homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Hepatic insulin sensitivity
Assessed via homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Pancreatic beta-cell function
Assessed via the insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2 (ISSI-2)
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Pancreatic beta-cell function
Assessed via the insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2 (ISSI-2)
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Body mass index
Calculated as body weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Body mass index
Calculated as body weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Objective physical activity
Objectively assessed via wrist-worn physical activity/heart rate monitor to measure the intensity and duration of all planned and unplanned exercise during the study period
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Subjective physical activity
Subjectively assessed via Godin Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire and reported as moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA)
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Subjective physical activity
Subjectively assessed via Godin Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire and reported as moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA)
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Social support
Measured using the Social Support Survey-Clinical (SSS-C) form, a 5-item survey designed to measure five dimensions of social support + a single item to assess cancer-specific social support.
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Social support
Measured using the Social Support Survey-Clinical (SSS-C) form, a 5-item survey designed to measure five dimensions of social support + a single item to assess cancer-specific social support.
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Exercise self-efficacy
Measured using the Multidimensional Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale (MSES) to measure three behavioural subdomains: task, scheduling, and coping
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Exercise self-efficacy
Measured using the Multidimensional Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale (MSES) to measure three behavioural subdomains: task, scheduling, and coping
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Anxiety
Measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), a 7-item inventory that assesses 2-week anxiety symptom frequency on a 0-3 scale, with higher scores reflecting higher symptom frequency. A cut-off of ≥10 indicates some degree of clinical anxiety.
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Anxiety
Measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), a 7-item inventory that assesses 2-week anxiety symptom frequency on a 0-3 scale, with higher scores reflecting higher symptom frequency. A cut-off of ≥10 indicates some degree of clinical anxiety.
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Depression
Measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a 9-item inventory that assesses 2-week depressive symptom frequency on a 0-3 scale, with higher scores reflecting higher symptom frequency. The PHQ-9 has been validated in cancer survivors using a cut-off of ≥8 to indicate some degree of clinical depression.
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Depression
Measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a 9-item inventory that assesses 2-week depressive symptom frequency on a 0-3 scale, with higher scores reflecting higher symptom frequency. The PHQ-9 has been validated in cancer survivors using a cut-off of ≥8 to indicate some degree of clinical depression.
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Health-related quality of life
Measured using the Medical Outcomes Survey Short-Form (SF-12).
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Health-related quality of life
Measured using the Medical Outcomes Survey Short-Form (SF-12).
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
Health service utilization
Measured using the Health Service Utilization Inventory.
Time frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up (Primary RCT)
Health service utilization
Measured using the Health Service Utilization Inventory.
Time frame: Baseline to 24-month follow-up (Primary and Secondary RCTs)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.