This is a randomized clinical trial that randomizes between treatment principles. The study will investigate if precision therapy determined by a tumour board is better than standard treatment for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in elderly. The tumour board will decide the precision therapy based on identified genetic changes that can guide customized therapy. There are currently 40-50 targeted therapies approved for various cancers in Norway. The precision therapy will be given in addition to the standard treatment. The primary study objective will be to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a precision therapy strategy compared with standard treatment. Other objectives will mesaure efficacy and satety of the treatment, and impact on life quality of the patients.
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in the elderly are not curable since elderly patients usually do not tolerate intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic stemcell transplantation. Next generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA can find changes in tumor DNA that can be targeted by new drugs, so called "precision therapy". Precision therapy drugs are usually less toxic than standard treatment, and thus may be particularly well suited for elderly. Precision therapy is principally different from today's standard therapy since it will be individualized based on NGS from the tumor, while in standard therapy all patients receive the same treatment. It is unknown how a precision therapy strategy will perform compared with standard therapy in AML and high-risk MDS in the elderly. A Clinical Tumour Board will decide on the precision therapy. Study design: This is a prospective, open label, single centre, randomized phase II clinical trial. The study randomizes between standard treatment and precision therapy in unfit elderly patients with AML and high-risk MDS. Importantly, this study design is not a randomization between treatments as in a traditional clinical trial, but a randomization between treatment principles. This means that patients in the standard treatment arm will receive the same treatment, while patients in the precision arm will receive different treatments based on the profiling of the tumor cells. Since most of the precision therapies will be experimental, the study is designed so that the patients in both arms receive a period of standard treatment before randomization. This is to reduce the risk of patients not receiving effective treatment, so that the precision therapy can be tested safely. The standard treatment for AML and high-risk MDS in elderly may change during the study, therefore "standard treatment" is defined as the recommended treatment in Norway at any time point. This means that MDS patients and AML patients may have different standard therapy. Diagnostic sampling and genomic profiling will be done on the bone marrow of all included patients before start of treatment and compared with germline DNA from buccal swab taken at the bone-marrow. Treatment with hydroxyurea prior to the initial standard treatment is allowed to get leukocytes below 30. While the patient receive two initial 28 day cycles of standard treatment, NGS of the bone marrow samples are done and assessed in the diagnostic pipeline, followed by bioinformatics analysis. The information is then interpreted by a Clinical Tumour Board consisting of pathologists, haematologists, oncologists, molecular biologists and bioinformatician, the treating hematologist and study nurse. The Clinical Tumour Board makes the decision on targeted treatment. After initial standard therapy bone marrow samples will be evaluated for response to treatment. Patients with progressive disease as defined by the European Leukemia Net will go out of the study and receive treatment according to investigators choice. Notably, the results from the Clinical Tumour Board will be available for these patients to provide best possible treatment. Patients without disease progression are randomized in a stratified manner 2:1 after the initial treatment with standard therapy to either precision therapy advised by the Clinical Tumour Board or continuous standard therapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
36
For AML patients: Venetoclax will be administered orally once daily Days 1 through 28, of a 28-day cycle, with a designated dose of 400 mg daily after ramp up in Cycle 1. During Cycle 1 Days 1 - 3, the dose of Venetoclax will ramp up from 100 mg on Day 1, 200 mg on Day 2, and 400 mg on Day 3. Azacitidine (100 mg/m2) is given once daily following administration of venetoclax for 5 days of every cycle, starting on Day 1 of each cycle. For MDS patients: Azacitidine (100 mg/m2) is given once daily for 5 days of every 28 day cycle, starting on day 1 of each cycle.
Precision therapy for both AML and MDS patients is standard therapy + tumor board determined precision therapy. The tumor board determined precision therapy can be all available drugs with a marketing authorization in Norway.
Akershus Universitetssykehus
Lørenskog, Norway
RECRUITINGcost-effectiveness of a precision therapy
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a precision therapy strategy compared with standard treatment. The total cost of the treatment will be calculated and divided on health related quality of life (HRQoL)
Time frame: 4-5 years
Event free survival
Median event free survival, i.e., the number of days to death or progression of the disease (whichever comes first)with AML or MDS
Time frame: 4-5 years
Overall survival
Median overall survival
Time frame: 4-5 years
Adverse events
The number of adverse events.
Time frame: 4-5 years
Toxicity
The number of adverse events with CTCAE grade 3 or more
Time frame: 4-5 years
Transfusion independence
The number of erythrocyte- or thrombocyte-transfusionsCR: Bone marrow blasts \< 5%; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count \>1.0 x 109/L; platelet count \>100 x 109/L CR with incomplete recovery (CRi): All CR criteria except for residual neutropenia (\<1.0 x 109/L) or thrombocytopenia (\<100 x 109/L) PR:All hematologic criteria of CR; decrease of bone marrow blast percentage to 5% to 25%; and decrease of pretreatment bone marrow blast percentage by at least 50%
Time frame: 4-5 years
Budget impact
Budget impact of providing targeted treatment to all eligible patients.
Time frame: 4-5 years
Overall response rate
For AML overall response rate is defined as Complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete recovery (CRi), Morphologic leukemia-free state, or Partial remission. For MDS overall response rate is defined as Complete remission, Marrow Complete Response, or Partial remission.
Time frame: 4-5 years
Quality of life
Difference in quality of life using EQ-5D questionnaire between treatment arms
Time frame: 4-5 years
Total costs
Total costs of precision therapy.
Time frame: 4-5 years
Progression
Median number of days to progression of MDS to AML.
Time frame: 4-5 years
Sequencing quality
The fraction of sequencing results with quality good enough to make a decision.
Time frame: 4-5 years
Dry tap
The fraction of patients who were excluded because of dry-tap.
Time frame: 4-5 years
Person staff time
Person-time used to sequence
Time frame: 4-5 years
Person-time used to find possible precision therapy
Person time on tumour board and preparations
Time frame: 4-5 years
Patients with actionable targets
The fraction of patients with actionable targets.
Time frame: 4-5 years
MDS progression to AML
The median time to AML progression for patients with MDS
Time frame: 4-5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.