The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CNTX-6970 for the treatment of pain related to OA of the knee compared to placebo. CNTX-6970 is being developed as a new treatment for chronic pain, including painful osteoarthritis of the knee.
The study will employ a randomized, allocation-concealed, multicenter, placebo-controlled, multi-period crossover design (Schmid et al, 2018). This multi-period crossover randomized, controlled trial allows comparability and assessment of efficacy through repeated exposures within each subject to the active treatment and a control (placebo) in randomized sequence. Such multi-period crossover designs are ideal for treatments with rapid onset of action and short half-life such as the asset under study here. We have strived to minimize the complexity of this powerful design by using only 2 blocks with 2 periods each. The modest additional complexity of the proposed multi-period crossover design, compared to a parallel-groups design, is justified by the marked improvement in efficiency. The gains in efficiency afforded by the multi-period crossover design allow a substantial reduction in sample size without sacrificing statistical power. The trial will compare an active treatment vs. placebo. Each block will consist of two treatment periods with each period lasting 6 weeks. Treatment assignments (active drug versus placebo) will be randomized for each patient to the two periods within each block. The period length of 6 weeks was chosen based on several considerations: (i) Most efficacious analgesic drugs demonstrate separation from placebo by 6 weeks; (ii) The decision to move CNTX-6970 forward to Phase 3 will require a clinically meaningful separation from placebo by 6 weeks; (iii) In this Phase 2 study, implementing a treatment block longer than 6 weeks would make the overall design more challenging and burdensome by extending the duration of overall testing beyond 6 months; (iv). In this study, the placebo will consist of inactive tablets identical to the active treatment tablets. Treatment assignments (active drug versus placebo) will be randomized for each patient to the two treatment periods within each block.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
55
University of California San Diego
La Jolla, California, United States
University of California- Davis
Sacramento, California, United States
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC-A)
The primary outcome measure used to assess efficacy will be patient-reported knee pain using the WOMAC Part A (Bellamy, et al., 1988).We will use the numerical rating scale version of the WOMAC, with the subject assessing each of 5 questions using an 11-point (0 to 10) scale; the total score is the sum of the individual item scores (range 0-50). A higher WOMAC score represents worse symptom severity.
Time frame: 24 Weeks
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
The primary safety endpoint is the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs), reported between the administration of study drug on Day 1 and the completion of the study at week 24 or early termination.
Time frame: 24 Weeks
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Daily Knee Pain Intensity on a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Pain intensity is reported by patients with chronic pain as one of the most important targets of treatment, and daily pain intensity ratings are a recommended core outcome measure for clinical trials of treatments for chronic pain. Daily ratings are preferable to ratings of recalled pain over longer time periods such as a week, as daily ratings minimize the influence of recall biases (Dworkin et al., 2005). Participants provide one-daily reports (at the end of the day) of their average knee pain intensity on a 0-10 pain intensity NRS over the course of a week, and those daily ratings are averaged to compute a mean knee pain intensity score. Participants will record their Daily Pain Intensity Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10 each day for one week prior to each clinic visit using NEForm. Lower NRS values correspond to less pain.
Time frame: 24 Weeks
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC-C)
WOMAC-C (Function subscale) (Bellamy et al, 1988). The WOMAC-physical function subscale contains 17 items assessing daily functioning, each using an 11-point (0 to 10) numerical rating scale. The total index score (0-170) is the sum of the items. A higher WOMAC function score represents worse functioning and less ability to engage in daily activities.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
M&M Clinical Trials
Miami, Florida, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Healthcare Research Network
Hazelwood, Missouri, United States
New York University Langone Health
New York, New York, United States
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, United States
...and 6 more locations
Time frame: 24 Weeks
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety
The HADS is a 14-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess symptoms of anxiety and depression in those with medical illness (Norton et al, 2013). This scale has 14 items, 7 related to anxiety and 7 to depression, rated on 4 points (0 to 3) in domains of intensity or frequency. Scoring is done separately for depression and for anxiety and each domain is interpreted as normal for scores of 0-7, borderline abnormal (borderline case) for scores of 8-10 and abnormal (case) for scores of 11-21. This scale is used to assess depression and anxiety in addition to HEAL/EPPIC-Net core data elements (CDEs) because of its higher sensitivity to change especially in patients with medical illnesses.
Time frame: 24 Weeks
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
The PGIC is a single-item measure of patient-reported improvement that is widely used as a general outcome measure in studies of chronic pain patients, including OA patients (Salaff et al, 2004). It is often used as an index of treatment-associated change, and patient-reported improvements in the form of PGIC scores correlate robustly with significant improvement in pain intensity, pain interference with activities of daily living, mood, and quality of life (Perrot and Lanteri-Minet, 2019). The PCIC was collected at baseline and week 24. PGIC is scored from 0-6, where lower values correspond to better outcomes (e.g., 0 = very much improved, whereas 6 is very much worse).
Time frame: 24 Weeks
Serum Levels of Cytokines and Chemokines
Assessed at baseline and at the end of each treatment period (weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24).Serum levels are measured in Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL). Analyses were performed for Aim 5 to assess the efficacy of CNTX-6970 (300mg BID) in comparison to placebo in biomarkers from (b) serum and synovial fluid levels of chemokines and cytokines; and (c) Synovial monocyte chemoattractant protein-1/CCR-2 receptor binding inhibition in blood and synovial fluid. The following 9 biomarkers had sufficient data based on either the ability to fit models A and/or B and at least 50% of the values were above the minimum detectable threshold: Alpha.2.Macroglobulin..A2Macro, Immunoglobulin.A..IgA, Macrophage.Inflammatory.Protein.1.beta..MIP.1.beta, Monocyte.Chemotactic.Protein.1..MCP.1, Serum.Amyloid.P.Component..SAP,
Time frame: 24 Weeks
MCP-1/CCR-2
Monocyte chemoattractant serum protein-1(MCP-1)/CCR-2 receptor binding inhibition by CNTX-6970. This will be assessed at baseline and at the end of each treatment period (weeks 6, 12, 18 and 24). The data is measured in pg per mL, the data in analyzed in the natural log of pg per mL, with higher numbers indicating more binding inhibition.
Time frame: 24 Weeks
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression
The HADS is a 14-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess symptoms of anxiety and depression in those with medical illness (Norton et al, 2013). This scale has 14 items, 7 related to anxiety and 7 to depression, rated on 4 points (0 to 3) in domains of intensity or frequency. Scoring is done separately for depression and for anxiety and each domain is interpreted as normal for scores of 0-7, borderline abnormal (borderline case) for scores of 8-10 and abnormal (case) for scores of 11-21. This scale is used to assess depression and anxiety in addition to HEAL/EPPIC-Net core data elements (CDEs) because of its higher sensitivity to change especially in patients with medical illnesses.
Time frame: 24 Weeks
PROMIS - 6A
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Scale 6A (Yu et al, 2011). Sleep disruption has a bi-directional relationship with chronic pain and is an important secondary outcome to measure in pain trials (Edwards et al, 2016). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance short form is a convenient 6-item scale that correlates strongly with the longer forms. It shows greater measurement precision for assessing sleep disturbance than other commonly-used (and much longer) questionnaires such as the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale; its brevity and convenience are a major advantage for both research and clinical settings (Yu et al, 2011). 60 is the most commonly used threshold for clinically significant sleep. The PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Scale is expressed as a T-score, with a population mean of 50 and SD of 10. A higher T-score indicates better physical functioning. Possible T scores in this distribution range from 31.7 to 76.1.
Time frame: 24 Weeks
Staircase-evoked Pain Assessment
This procedure consists of stepping fully up and down onto an 8in (20.32cm) high platform with both feet a total of 24 times. The lead leg is alternated between each up/down cycle. Subjects are instructed to use their normal gait for completing this task and are encouraged to complete the task despite increasing pain, without stopping if possible. The procedure is timed, and current knee pain intensity on a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is assessed immediately before and following the procedure while the subject is in a seated, resting position. Lower values correspond to less pain. The NRS from the post-step was analyzed.
Time frame: 24 Weeks