Treatment options for individuals who have advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA) and a body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2 are limited, and this patient population may be neglected in current clinical care pathways for OA management. These individuals are considered to be at high risk for complications with total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and as a result may not be eligible for this procedure unless they lose significant weight. However, there is limited evidence for endorsing weight loss as beneficial prior to TKA. Further, unsupervised weight loss could put patients at risk for muscle loss and development of sarcopenic obesity, a health condition that negatively impacts mobility and mortality. This suggests that weight loss might not be the primary treatment goal for this patient population. Integrated non-surgical treatment approaches are needed that can target the specific needs of this knee OA patient group. This study will examine the feasibility and acceptability of a personalized, multicomponent intervention, and its effects on body composition and physical function compared to usual care.
The primary objectives of the POMELO study are to determine if a multicomponent behavioural intervention that includes personalized nutrition recommendations, progressive resistance training exercise, and chronic disease self-management support is feasible and acceptable for individuals living with advanced knee OA and a BMI ≥35 kg/m2. The secondary objectives are to assess potential effects of the intervention on muscle mass and physical function compared to usual care. The intervention is delivered over three months, followed by six months of ongoing maintenance support. Assessments are completed at baseline, interim (after the 3 month intervention phase), and at study end (after the 6 month maintenance phase) \[for a total study period of 10 months\]. This project will inform and influence the future development and implementation of more personalized knee OA treatment approaches for adults with a BMI ≥35 kg/m2 and reduce health disparities in access to effective care. Findings will also contribute to improved health outcomes for this vulnerable patient population, and enhanced delivery of health services by offering an alternative treatment pathway targeted to patient needs.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
50
Targeted nutrition advice, progressive resistance training exercise, and self-management support
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Per-protocol adherence (feasibility)
per-protocol adherence to the intervention \>= 60%
Time frame: at interim (3 months)
Adverse events
rates of adverse events in the intervention and control arms
Time frame: at interim (3 months)
Study completion rates (feasibility)
study completion rates \>= 80%
Time frame: at study completion (10 months)
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) score
AIM scores compared between the intervention and control groups
Time frame: at interim (3 months) and study completion (10 months)
Qualitative data on participants perceptions of acceptability
qualitative data from open-ended survey and interview questions under each domain of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability
Time frame: at interim (3 months) and study completion (10 months)
muscle mass
appendicular lean mass assessed by DXA
Time frame: change from baseline to interim (3 months) and study completion (10 months)
physical function (chair stands)
number of chair stands in 30 seconds
Time frame: change from baseline to interim (3 months) and study completion (10 months)
physical function (6MWT distance)
6MWT distance
Time frame: change from baseline to interim (3 months) and study completion (10 months)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.