The shoulder is a mobile structure which generates a lot of pathologies. One of them is rotator cuff tendinosis. On the other hand, it has been investigated that Maitland is effective for reducing pain and for mobility in the cervical and lumbar spine and in joints such as the knee and ankle, however, there are few studies that confirm that it is effective in shoulder pathologies.So here the investigatprs want to study the effectiveness of Maitland as an adjunctive treatment for shoulder pathologies, comparing it with conventional physiotherapy treatment, in relation to the reduction of pain and increased mobility. For that the investigators have a randomized clinical trial with two group.
Group 1 receives tens, SW, conventional physiotherapy and exercises as treatment. Group 2 receives tens, SW, Mailtland, and exercises. An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
63
An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
GRUPO ICOT Policlínico Las Palmas.
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
Change of Range of Motion (ROM)
Active ROM of the affected shoulder is measured using a Mechanic Analysis to assess range of motion. These measurements included abduction, flexion, internal rotation, and external rotation.
Time frame: Baseline and 1, 5, and 7 weeks after treatment
Change of Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Visual analogue score (VAS) was done at rest and at shoulder movement. VAS was explained to the patients during assessment as 0 equal no pain and 10 equal worst imaginable pain.
Time frame: Baseline and 1, 5, and 7 weeks after treatment
Change of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) was filled by patient during assessment as 0 equal better functionality and 100 equal worst functionality
Time frame: Baseline and 1, 5, and 7 weeks after treatment
Change of American shoulder and elbow Surgeons" (ASES)
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) was filled by patient during assessment as 0 equal worst functionality and 100 is equal better functionality
Time frame: Baseline and 1, 5, and 7 weeks after treatment
Change of 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)
Health Survey (SF-36) was filled by patient during assessment as 0 equal worst health and 100 is equal better health
Time frame: Baseline and 1, 5, and 7 weeks after treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.