The general objective of the study is to confirm the medium/long-term safety and clinical performance of the CELLIS Breast membranes used in breast reconstruction and to identify emerging risks in comparison to clinical data related to other treatment modalities. The present study will be a prospective, multicentric, non-randomized and non-controlled trial involving 112 patients followed for 24 months. The study will be conducted in France in 7 investigational centres.
The study will be prospective, multicentric, single-arm observational (non-interventional) to evaluate the safety and performance of the CELLIS Breast membranes used in breast reconstruction following mastectomy. All evaluations will be performed and products used according to the usual practice, without additional or unusual diagnostic, treatment and monitoring procedure. The study will be conducted in France in 7 investigational centres including 112 patients scheduled for a breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Each patient will participate in one assessment period including a preoperative visit, followed by the day of surgical procedure and a hospitalization period. Patients will return for ambulatory visits on day 10 (+/- 5 days) and/or on day 30 (+/- 7 days), on month 3 (+/- 2 weeks), on month 12 (+/- 2 weeks) and on month 24 (+/-2 weeks) post-surgery. CELLIS Breast is available in one thickness, in a variety of size and forms addressing multiple surgical techniques.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
112
Biological membrane used in breast reconstruction
Institut Bergonié
Bordeaux, France
Hôpital Ambroise Paré
Boulogne-Billancourt, France
Hôpitaux civils de Colmar
Colmar, France
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lille, France
Rate of adverse events. Main complications of interest: infection, cellulitis, seroma, hematoma, skin flap-nipple necrosis, delayed wound healing, wound dehiscence, red breast syndrome, capsular contracture, implant related
Percentage
Time frame: From the surgical procedure throughout the entire 24-month follow-up period
Patient aesthetic evaluation evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The suppleness of the reconstruction will be evaluated (natural-hard): VAS score from 1 to 10 (1=very bad suppleness, breast hard; 10=excellent suppleness-natural breast).
Described at each visit
Time frame: At the 3, 12 and 24-month follow-up visits
Surgeon aesthetic evaluation: satisfaction related to the quality of the reconstruction (very good, good, fair, bad), suppleness (Visual Analog Scale score from 1 to 10 with 10=excellent suppleness) and symmetry (very good, good, fair, bad).
Percentage of each modality and VAS score described at each visit
Time frame: At the 3, 12 and 24-month follow-up visits
Patient-reported pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS) scored from 0 to 10 (0=no pain; 10=worse pain).
Described at each visit
Time frame: At the 10-day, 30-day, 3-month, 12-month and 24-month follow-up visits
Patient analgesics consumption
Percentage of analgesics consumption with a Cochrane-Armitage trend test.
Time frame: At the 10-day, 30-day, 3-month, 12-month and 24-month follow-up visits
Quality of life (QoL) by the use of the SF-36 questionnaire.
Change from screening of each domain score and total score at 24-month. The SF-36 has eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0 - 100 with lower scores = more disability, and higher scores = less disability
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, France
Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
Paris, France
Hôpital Tenon
Paris, France
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site René Gauducheau
Saint-Herblain, France
IUCT Oncopole
Toulouse, France
lnstitut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, France
Time frame: At baseline and at 24 month
Description of device deficiency: inadequacy of a medical device with respects to its identity, quality, durability, reliability, safety or performance. Device deficiencies include malfunctions, use errors, and inadequate labelling.
Summarized and listed
Time frame: During the surgical procedure