The purpose of this study is to estimate the effect PF-07321332/Ritonavir and Ritonavir on Midazolam (a cytochrome P450 \[CYP\]3A4 substrate) in Healthy Adult Participants.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
12
Midazolam administered as a single dose on Day 1
PF-07321332/ritonavir: Administered orally every 12 hours for a total of 9 doses on Days 1-5 Midazolam: Administered orally as a single dose on Day 5
Ritonavir: Administered orally every 12 hours for a total of 9 doses on Day1-5. Midazolam: Administered orally as a single dose on Day 5
Brussels Clinical Research Unit
Brussels, Bruxelles-capitale, Région de, Belgium
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With PF-07321332/Ritonavir
Cmax for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir was observed directly from data. Natural log-transformed Cmax for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (PF-07321332/ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.
Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity Time (AUCinf) of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With PF-07321332/Ritonavir
AUCinf for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir was calculated by AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis. Natural log-transformed AUCinf for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (PF-07321332/ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.
Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (Clast) (AUClast) of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With PF-07321332/Ritonavir
AUClast for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir was calculated by Linear/Log trapezoidal method. Natural log-transformed AUClast for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (PF-07321332/ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event was considered a TEAE if the event started during the effective duration of treatment. All events that start on or after the first dosing day and time/ start time, if collected, but before the last dose plus the lag time (28 days) were flagged as TEAEs. The algorithm did consider any events that started prior to the first dose date. Any events occurring following start of treatment or increasing in severity were counted as treatment emergent. Events that occur in a non-treatment period (for example, Washout or Follow-up) were counted as treatment emergent and attributed to the previous treatment taken.
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
The haematological, clinical chemistry (serum) and urinalysis safety tests were assessed against the criteria specified in the sponsor reporting standards to determine if there were any clinically significant laboratory abnormalities. The assessment took into account whether each participant's baseline test result was within or outside the laboratory reference range for the particular laboratory parameter. Baseline was defined as the last planned predose measurement taken in each study period.
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities
Baseline was the last predose recording in each study period. Only post baseline values are included in this analysis
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Baseline and changes from baseline in PR, QT, QRS, heart rate and QTcF were summarized by treatment and time postdose. Baseline was defined as the average of the triplicate predose recordings in each study period. ECG endpoints and changes from baseline (QTcF, PR, QRS), over all measurements taken postdose, were also summarized descriptively by treatment using categories as defined in the Criteria for Safety Values of Potential Clinical Concern appendix of the protocol and for QTc values corresponding to ICH E14 thresholds, which are: QTcF (msec): 450\<value≤480; 480\<value≤500; \>500; QTcF (msec) increase from baseline: 30\<change≤60; change\>60
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28
Cmax of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With Ritonavir
Cmax for midazolam following single dose administration with and without ritonavir was observed directly form data. Natural log-transformed Cmax for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.
Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose
AUCinf of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With Ritonavir
AUCinf for midazolam following single dose administration with and without ritonavir was calculated by AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis. Natural log-transformed AUCinf for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.
Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose
AUClast of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With Ritonavir
AUClast for midazolam following single dose administration with and without ritonavir was calculated by Linear/Log trapezoidal method. Natural log-transformed AUClast for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.
Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam/ritonavir: Day 5 pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose
Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir
CL/F for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir or ritonavir was calculated by Dose/AUCinf.
Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir
Vz/F for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir or ritonavir was calculated by Dose/(AUCinf • kel).
Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose
Time for Cmax (Tmax) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir
Tmax for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir or ritonavir was calculated by observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.
Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose
Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir
t½ for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir or ritonavir was calculated by Loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log-linear.
Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose