This Phase 2 study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of monthly intravenous doses of IXT-m200 in treatment-seeking individuals with methamphetamine (METH) use disorder. The hypothesis are that following an initial relapse, IXT-m200 will reduce the occurrence of stimulant-positive saliva samples compared to placebo and improve the signs and symptoms of METH Use Disorder (MUD).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
61
IXT-m200 binds METH with high selectivity and affinity. The product contains a murine METH-binding variable region and the constant domains of a human immunoglobulin G (IgG) 2κ. This antibody isotype was chosen because of the lower risk of immune response compared to an IgG1 or IgG3. IXT-m200 targets METH, does not rely on binding to any endogenous target for its action, and has been well-tolerated in previous clinical studies.
Saline
Pillar Clinical Research
Bentonville, Arkansas, United States
Woodlands International Research Group
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Artemis Institute for Clinical Research
San Diego, California, United States
Pillar Clinical Research
Percent of 20 Weeks Abstinent From Stimulants Following a 4-week Grace Period
The difference in group means between the IXT-m200 and placebo groups for the percent of 20 weeks abstinent from stimulants following a 4-week grace period as measured by saliva screens in treatment-seeking individuals with Methamphetamine Use Disorder. All observations will be used, regardless of whether a participant discontinued treatment early. All missing values will be imputed assuming the participant is not abstinent.
Time frame: 20 weeks
Change From Screening in Participant-rated Quality of Life as Measured by the Treatment Effectiveness Assessment at Week 13, 25, and 33.
Treatment Effectiveness Assessment (TEA) asks questions in four domains with results ranging from 4-40 with higher scores representing a better outcome.
Time frame: Weeks 13, 25, and 33
Proportion of Responders in Early Remission at Week 25 as Measured by DSM-5 Criteria
A responder is defined as a participant who meets the definition of early remission, i.e., at least 3 months and \<12 months without meeting DSM-5 criteria other than craving.
Time frame: 25 weeks
Difference Between Groups in Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 13, 25, and 33
The CGIC asks clinicians to complete one statement with the result ranging from 1-7 with lower scores representing a better outcome.
Time frame: Weeks 13, 25, and 33
Difference Between Groups in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 13, 25, and 33
The PGIC asks patients to complete one statement with the result ranging from 1-7 with lower scores representing a better outcome.
Time frame: Weeks 13, 25, and 33
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Lincolnwood, Illinois, United States
Midwest Clinical Research Center
Dayton, Ohio, United States
InSite Clinical Research
DeSoto, Texas, United States
HD Research
Houston, Texas, United States
Pillar Clinical Research
Richardson, Texas, United States
Alpine Research
Clinton, Utah, United States