This is a retrospective observational study drawing on data from the Brigham and Women's Home Hospital database. Sociodemographic and clinic data from a training cohort were used to train a machine learning algorithm to predict patient deterioration throughout a patient's admission. This algorithm was then validated in a validation cohort.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
500
We will retrospectively compare the alarms produced from traditional vital sign alarms (thresholds set by clinicians) versus the BioVitals Index vs the National Early Warning Score 2
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Alarm burden
The number of alarms fired per patient per hour
Time frame: From admission to discharge, measured in hours, on average 5 days
Sensitivity for recognition of a safety composite
The sensitivity (true positives divided by condition positives) for detection of a safety composite (overnight visit, extra unplanned visit, transfer back to the hospital, death during admission, delirium, loss of consciousness, or other major event).
Time frame: From admission to discharge, on average 5 days
Specificity for recognition of a safety composite
The specificity (true negatives divided by condition negatives) for detection of a safety composite (overnight visit, extra unplanned visit, transfer back to the hospital, death during admission, delirium, loss of consciousness, or other major event).
Time frame: From admission to discharge, on average 5 days
Positive predictive value for recognition of a safety composite
The positive predictive value (true positives divided by the sum of true positives plus false positives) for detection of a safety composite (overnight visit, extra unplanned visit, transfer back to the hospital, death during admission, delirium, loss of consciousness, or other major event).
Time frame: From admission to discharge, on average 5 days
Negative predictive value for recognition of a safety composite
The negative predictive value (true negatives divided by the sum of true negatives plus false negatives) for detection of a safety composite (overnight visit, extra unplanned visit, transfer back to the hospital, death during admission, delirium, loss of consciousness, or other major event).
Time frame: From admission to discharge, on average 5 days
Rate of alarms with clinical utility
We will use general estimating equations (GEE) with three outcomes per patient (the number of clinically important alarms for BioVitals, NEWS2, and traditional vital signs); the GEE will account for the clustering between the three outcomes on a patient. The GEE will use a negative binomial marginal model with a log-link for the number of alarms with clinical utility and an offset for log length-of stay (in hours); with this model, we model the rate per hour of number of alarms with clinical utility with BI, NEWS2, and traditional vital signs. The main covariate in the negative binomial model will be a three-level covariate for method: BI vs NEWS2 vs traditional vital signs, and the exponential of the effect of this covariate will be a pair-wise rate ratio for BI vs NEWS2 vs traditional vital signs.
Time frame: From admission to discharge, on average 5 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.