A better understanding of how to incorporate effective smoking cessation measures into clinical practice is requested. In this is prospective, multi-center, randomized, open, blinded end-point (PROBE) trial, we assigned daily smokers hospitalized with an acute cardiac event 1:1 to an in-hospital nurse-led smoking cessation intervention with direct referral to further follow-up in the municipal healthy life-centres (intensive intervention) or to written information about smoking cessation and the municipal program (low-threshold intervention) . The primary outcome will be the smoking cessation rates between the groups at 6 months follow-up. Key secondary outcomes include a cost-effectiveness analysis of the intensive intervention and cessation rates at 3- and 12-months follow-up, the proportion who used nicotine replacement therapy and the proportion who attended the healthy-life center program between the two groups. We also assess effects of recurrent cardiovascular events and mortality after 12 months, two and five years follow-up. Exploratory analyses include new knowledge about the patient and system factors of importance for participation to healthy life-centers and for changes in smoking behaviour.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
221
Usual care treatment and written information to patients and general practitionnaires about smoking cessation and the municipal healthy life-centres
Drammen Hospital
Drammen, Akershus, Norway
Ringerike Hospital
Hønefoss, Akershus, Norway
Kongsberg Hospital
Kongsberg, Akershus, Norway
Difference between the groups in point prevalence of self-report smoking abstinence at six months follow-up
Difference between the groups in the proportion of participants who self-report smoking abstinence over the whole follow-up period at six months follow-up allowing up to five cigarettes in total
Time frame: Six months after randomization
Difference between the groups in proportion who quit smoking determined with objectively
Difference between the groups in proportion of participants who quit smoking measured by the level of carbon monoxide in the exhaled air
Time frame: Six months after randomization
Difference between the groups in point prevalence of self-report smoking abstinence three months after randomization
Difference between the groups in the proportion of participants who self-report smoking abstinence over the whole periode follow-up period at six months follow-up allowing up to five cigarettes in total
Time frame: Three months after randomization
Difference between the groups in point prevalence of self-report smoking abstinence 12 months after randomization
Difference between the groups in the proportion of participants who self-report smoking abstinence over the whole periode follow-up period at six months follow-up allowing up to five cigarettes in total
Time frame: Twelve months after randomization
Differences in participation rate at healthy life-centres between the groups
Differences in participation rate at healthy life-centres between the groups measured by telephone interview with personnell at the healthy life-centres
Time frame: 8 to 12 weeks after randomization
Differences in use of smoking cessation aids between the groups
Differences in the proportion of patients who use of smoking cessation aids (nicotine replacement therapy) between the groups measured by patient self-report
Time frame: 8 to 12 weeks after randomization
Difference between the groups in the composite end-point all-cause mortality, hospitalisation for myocardial infarction, stroke, transitrory ischemic attac, coronary revascularisation or symptomatic periperial artery disease
Difference between the groups in the composite end-point all-cause mortality, hospitalisation for myocardial infarction, stroke, transitrory ischemic attac, coronary revascularisation or symptomatic periperial artery disease obtained from hospital medical records
Time frame: From baseline until 2 years follow-up
Difference between the groups in the composite end-point all-cause mortality, hospitalisation for myocardial infarction, stroke, transitrory ischemic attac, coronary revascularisation or symptomatic periperial artery disease
Difference between the groups in the composite end-point all-cause mortality, hospitalisation for myocardial infarction, stroke, transitrory ischemic attac, coronary revascularisation or symptomatic periperial artery disease obtained from hospital medical records
Time frame: From baseline until 5 years follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.