Previous studies found that some NMDA-enhancing agents were able to improve clinical symptoms of patients with schizophrenia. Whether treatment of an NMDA-enhancing agent can benefit the treatment of prodromal schizophrenia deserves study.
Several lines of evidence suggest that NMDA hypotheses have been implicated in schizophrenia. Previous studies found that some NMDA-enhancing agents were able to benefit the treatment of schizophrenia. Whether an NMDA-enhancer (NMDAE) can benefit the treatment of prodromal schizophrenia deserves study. Therefore, this study aims to compare NMDAE and placebo in the treatment of prodromal schizophrenia. The subjects with prodromal schizophrenia at first receive 6 weeks of health-promotion intervention (including exercise and education). A total of 48 subjects who do not respond sufficiently to the health-promotion program are then recruited to this 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, which aims to compare treatment response of NMDAE vs. placebo in 1:1 ratio. Clinical performances and side effects are measured at weeks -6 (before the screening phase), 0 (baseline of the drug trial), 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12. Cognitive functions are assessed at baseline and at endpoint of treatment by a battery of tests. The efficacies of NMDAE and placebo will be compared. Chi-square (or Fisher's exact test) will be used to compare differences of categorical variables and t-test (or Mann-Whitney test if the distribution is not normal) for continuous variables between treatment groups. Mean changes from baseline in repeated-measure assessments will be assessed using the generalized estimating equation (GEE). All p values for clinical measures will be based on two-tailed tests with a significance level of 0.05.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
48
Use of an NMDA enhancer for the treatment of prodromal schizophrenia .
Use of placebo as a comparator
Department of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital
Taichung, Taiwan
RECRUITINGChange from baseline in Scale of Prodromal Symptoms [SOPS] total score
Assessment of overall prodromal symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 114, the higher scores mean a worse outcome. As shown in "Detailed Description", "mean changes from baseline in repeated-measure assessments will be assessed using the generalized estimating equation (GEE). That is, GEE is used for analyzing the changes from baseline in repeated-measure assessments by a single analysis (but not multiple analyses).
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Change from baseline in SOPS Positive Symptom Scale score
Assessment of positive prodromal symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 30, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Change from baseline in SOPS Negative Symptom Scale score
Assessment of negative prodromal symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 36, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Change from baseline in SOPS Disorganization Symptom Scale score
Assessment of disorganization prodromal symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 24, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Change from baseline in SOPS General Symptom Scale score
Assessment of general prodromal symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 24, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Change from baseline in Scales for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) total score
Assessment of schizophrenia negative symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:100, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Change from baseline in Clinical Global Impression
Assessment of general impression. Minimum value: 1, maximum value:7, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Change from baseline in Global Assessment of Functioning
Assessment of social, occupational, and psychological function. Minimum value: 1, maximum value:100, the higher scores mean better function.
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Change from baseline in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:52, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Change from baseline in Quality of Life Scale
Assessment of life quality. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:126, the higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Change from baseline in Cognitive function
The measure is the composite from multiple measures. All tests have no unit. For the domain (a. and c.) with more than one test, a composite T score will be calculated by standardizing the average of each T score. Furthermore, a global composite score (for all seven domains) and a neurocognitive composite score (for the first 6 domains, a-f) will be also calculated by standardizing the average of the T score of each domain (Lane HY et al, JAMA Psychiatry. 2013). Ten tests for assessment of 7 cognitive domains: 1. speed of processing (assessed by Category Fluency, Trail Marking A, WAIS-III Digit Symbol-Coding); 2. sustained attention (Continuous Performance Test); 3. working memory: verbal (digit span) and nonverbal (spatial span); 4. verbal learning and memory (WMS-III, word listing); 5. visual learning and memory (WMS-III, visual reproduction); 6. reasoning and problem solving (WISC-III, Maze); 7. social cognition (MSCEIT Version 2)
Time frame: Week 0, 12