A study of acalabrutinib plus venetoclax (AV) versus venetoclax plus obinutuzumab (VO) in previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma.
This is a phase III prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. After completion of the screening period, eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to each of the following intervention arms: Arm A: Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-limited finite AV therapy Arm B: MRD-limited finite VO therapy The study consists of screening, treatment, and post-intervention follow-up periods. Participants will undergo safety and efficacy assessments during each period for each study arm. The duration of individual participant involvement in the study will be approximately 5 years. All participants who discontinue study intervention will be followed for safety assessments and survival status. Safety/survival follow-up is not required if the participant permanently discontinues study intervention due to withdrawal of consent, loss to follow-up, or death
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
607
Dose formulation: Capsule or Tablet
Dose formulation: Tablet
Dose formulation: Injection
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
To assess whether minimal residual disease (MRD)-driven finite AV treatment is NI to MRD-driven finite VO treatment with respect to PFS. PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until date of objective progressive disease per International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) 2018 criteria as assessed by the investigator or death from any cause in the absence of progression.
Time frame: Until progressive disease (PD) [assessed Up to 6.6 Years].
Rate of peripheral blood (PB) undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) based on a clonoSEQ^®
To assess the effect of AV treatment compared with VO treatment on uMRD at sequential time points. Rate of PB uMRD is defined as proportion of participants achieving remission based on a clonoSEQ\^® assay result of \< 1 CLL cell per 100,000 leukocytes (\< 10 \^-5 ), after completion of 6 and 12 cycles of venetoclax (assessed at approximately 7/13 and 9/15 months for VO and AV, respectively), and at 24, 36, 48 and 60 months.
Time frame: Screening (Days -45 through -1); Arm A (AV): Day 28 of Cycles 8, 14 and 24 and post treatment follow up visits; Arm B (VO): Day 28 of Cycles 6, 12 and 24 and post treatment follow up visits
Rate of peripheral blood (PB) and Bone marrow (BM) undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) by flow cytometry
To assess the effect of AV treatment compared with VO treatment on uMRD at sequential timepoints. Rate of PB and BM uMRD is defined as \< 1 CLL cell per 10,000 leukocytes (\< 10\^-4) by flow cytometry, after completion of 12 cycles of venetoclax (assessed at approximately 13 and 15 months for VO and AV, respectively) and at 36 months.
Time frame: Cycle 14 (each Cycle length 28 days) Day 28 for Arm A (AV); Cycle 12 Day 28 for Arm B (VO) and Post treatment follow-up visits (assessed Up to 6.6 Years)
Overall Survival (OS)
To assess the effect of AV treatment compared with VO treatment on OS. OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until death from any cause.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Research Site
La Jolla, California, United States
Research Site
Longmont, Colorado, United States
Research Site
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Research Site
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Research Site
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Research Site
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Research Site
Buffalo, New York, United States
Research Site
New Hyde Park, New York, United States
Research Site
New York, New York, United States
...and 27 more locations
Time frame: Date of randomization until death from any cause (Assessed Up to 6.6 Years)
Event-free Survival (EFS)
To assess the effect of AV treatment compared with VO treatment on EFS. EFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression, initiation of subsequent CLL therapy, or death from any cause.
Time frame: Date of randomization until first occurrence of disease progression (Assessed Up to 6.6 Years)
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
To assess the effect of AV treatment compared with VO treatment on ORR. ORR is defined as the proportion of participants who achieve best response of Complete Response (CR), complete response with incomplete marrow recovery (Cri), nodular partial remission (nPR), or partial remission (PR) per iwCLL 2018 criteria as assessed by the investigator.
Time frame: Date of randomization until PD (Assessed Up to 6.6 Years)
Complete Response (CR) rate
To assess the effect of AV treatment compared with VO treatment on ORR. CR rate (uMRD per iwCLL guidelines 2018) after completion of 12 cycles of venetoclax.
Time frame: Date of randomization until PD (Assessed Up to 6.6 Years)
Change from baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 scales
To assess symptoms, functional status and global health status/quality of life (QoL), in participants treated with AV versus VO using the EORTC QLQ-C30. EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 items and measures symptoms, functioning, and global health status/QoL for all cancer types. Questions are grouped into 5 multi-item functional scales, 3 multi-item symptom scales, a 2-item global QoL scale, 5 single items assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by cancer participants, and 1 item on the financial impact of the disease. The EORTC QLQ-C30 will be scored according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. An outcome variable consisting of a score from 0 to 100 will be derived for each of the symptom scales, each of the functional scales, and the global measure of health status scale. Higher scores on the global measure of health status and functional scales indicate better health status/function, but higher scores on symptom scales represent greater symptom severity.
Time frame: For AV: Cycle 1-Cycle 2, Cycle 3-Cycle 14; After End of Treatment (EoT); Post treatment follow-up For VO: Cycle 1 Day 1-21, Cycle 1 Day 22-Cycle 6, Cycle 7-Cycle 24 (Each cycle is 28 days); After EoT, Post treatment follow-up (assessed Up to 6.6 years)
Change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-CLL17 scales
To assess symptoms, functional status, and global health status/QoL, participants treated with AV versus VO using the EORTC QLQ-CLL17. EORTC QLQ-CLL17 comprises 17 items grouped into 3 multi-item scales: 1) symptom burden, 2) physical condition/fatigue, and 3) worries/fears about health and functioning. The EORTC QLQ-CLL17 will be scored according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. An outcome variable consisting of a score from 0 to 100 will be derived for each of the symptom scales, each of the functional scales, and the global measure of health status scale. Higher scores on the global measure of health status and functional scales indicate better health status/function, but higher scores on symptom scales represent greater symptom severity.
Time frame: For AV: Cycle 1-Cycle 2, Cycle 3-Cycle 14; After End of Treatment (EoT); Post treatment follow-up For VO: Cycle 1 Day 1-21, Cycle 1 Day 22-Cycle 6, Cycle 7-Cycle 24 (Each cycle is 28 days); After EoT, Post treatment follow-up (assessed Up to 6.6 years)
Proportion of participants experiencing bruising as measured by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Patient Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) item for Bruising
To assess symptomatic toxicities patient perceived benefit-risk in participants treated with AV versus VO using the NCI PRO-CTCAE item for Bruising. It was designed to be used as a companion to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), the standard lexicon for adverse event reporting in cancer trials. The bruising item, which has a dichotomous yes/no response option, will be included in this study to capture patient-reported bruising.
Time frame: For AV: Cycle 1-Cycle 2, Cycle 3-Cycle 14; After End of Treatment (EoT); Post treatment follow-up For VO: Cycle 1 Day 1-21, Cycle 1 Day 22-Cycle 6, Cycle 7-Cycle 24 (Each cycle is 28 days); After EoT, Post treatment follow-up (assessed Up to 6.6 years)
Proportion of participants reporting each response option of the Patient Global Impression of Benefit-Risk (PGI-BR)
To assess patient perceived benefit-risk of treatment in participants treated with AV versus VO using the PGI-BR. PGI-BR consists of 4 study medication-related questions, one each on efficacy, side effects, convenience of use, and overall benefit-risk. Each item is scored separately, with the final item providing a single metric of a participant's overall benefit-risk assessment. The response from each question will be semi-quantitative. Each question ranges from Very (negative, Somewhat \[negative\]), Neutral, Somewhat \[positive\], Very \[positive\].
Time frame: For AV: Cycle 1-Cycle 2, Cycle 3-Cycle 14 (Each cycle is 28 days); and End of treatment, E/D, disease progression, and post-treatment follow-up visits (assessed up to 6.6 years)
Number of participants with adverse events (AEs)
To assess the safety and tolerability of AV treatment versus VO treatment in participants with previously untreated CLL/SLL.
Time frame: From screening (Days -45 through -1) until survival follow-up (Up to 6.6 years)