Vulvovaginal atrophy is common after menopause, with a significant negative effect on quality of life. Large cohort studies have reported the prevalence of vaginal dryness to be between 27% and 55% and dyspareunia between 32% and 41%. Management of urogenital atrophy includes lifestyle modification, nonhormonal treatments (vaginal lubricants or moisturizers, laser treatments), as well as hormonal treatments. The disadvantages of the non-surgical methods are average results, discontinuation, and frequent contraindications to hormonal treatments.This has led to a strong interest in the development of non-invasive or minimally invasive methods that are easy to implement, effective and durable. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) has been proposed as an alternative for the treatment of genitourinary menopausal syndrome (GMS) and stress urinary incontinence. PBMT devices exert their effect via non-thermal mechanisms. PBMT stimulates collagen and elastin synthesis in the vaginal tissue, to support the urethrovaginal sphincter and urethra, and to promote vasodilation in the vaginal and urethral submucosa. PHYSIOQUANTA has developed a vaginal probe coupled with its innovative MILTA™ process synergistically combining NPCL (Nano-Pulsed Cold Laser) laser emitters, infrared diodes and RGB (Red Green Blue) diodes, operating in a magnetic tunnel. The MILTA acts deeper than LEDs, due to the diffusion of photons in soft tissues. In this study, the study investigators aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of the MILTA™ GYNECO vaginal probe in a pilot study of first use in women. This clinical study on the MILTA vaginal probe is expected to result in its CE marking Class IIb DM.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
25
Six weekly photobiomodulation sessions (PBMT) using the MILTA ™ GYNECO vaginal probe.
CHU Nîmes
Nîmes, France
Centre Médical KARIS
Perpignan, France
Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes
Valenciennes, France
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] of the use of the MILTA™ GYNECO vaginal probe
Collection and investigation of the causality of adverse events linked to the treatment (expected adverse effects: burns, pain on penetration, tingling, edema, allergic reaction).
Time frame: Day 1
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] of the use of the MILTA™ GYNECO vaginal probe
Collection and investigation of the causality of adverse events linked to the treatment (expected adverse effects: burns, pain on penetration, tingling, edema, allergic reaction).
Time frame: Week 1
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] of the use of the MILTA™ GYNECO vaginal probe
Collection and investigation of the causality of adverse events linked to the treatment (expected adverse effects: burns, pain on penetration, tingling, edema, allergic reaction).
Time frame: Week 2
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] of the use of the MILTA™ GYNECO vaginal probe
Collection and investigation of the causality of adverse events linked to the treatment (expected adverse effects: burns, pain on penetration, tingling, edema, allergic reaction).
Time frame: Week 3
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] of the use of the MILTA™ GYNECO vaginal probe
Collection and investigation of the causality of adverse events linked to the treatment (expected adverse effects: burns, pain on penetration, tingling, edema, allergic reaction).
Time frame: Week 4
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] of the use of the MILTA™ GYNECO vaginal probe
Collection and investigation of the causality of adverse events linked to the treatment (expected adverse effects: burns, pain on penetration, tingling, edema, allergic reaction).
Time frame: Week 5
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] of the use of the MILTA™ GYNECO vaginal probe
Collection and investigation of the causality of adverse events linked to the treatment (expected adverse effects: burns, pain on penetration, tingling, edema, allergic reaction).
Time frame: Week 6
Performance of the MILTA™ GYNECO vaginal probe on pain linked to vaginal atrophy
Visual analogue scale (0-10): the device will be considered effective if the VAS pain score decreases by at least 30%
Time frame: Day 0
Performance of the MILTA™ GYNECO vaginal probe on pain linked to vaginal atrophy
Visual analogue scale (0-10): the device will be considered effective if the VAS pain score decreases by at least 30%
Time frame: Week 6
Performance of the MILTA™ GYNECO vaginal on the vaginal mucosa
Vaginal Health Index: Score 1-5
Time frame: Day 0
Performance of the MILTA™ GYNECO vaginal on the vaginal mucosa
Vaginal Health Index: Score 1-5
Time frame: Week 6
Vaginal pH
pH value between 4 - 7.5
Time frame: Day 0
Vaginal pH
pH value between 4 - 7.5
Time frame: Week 6
Vaginal flora
Nugent score: score from 0 to 10: 0 to 3: normal flora predominantly lactobacilli, 4 to 6: intermediate flora with scant lactobacilli and associated with other poorly differentiated bacterial morphotypes in small quantities, 7 to 10: suggestive of bacterial vaginosis
Time frame: Day 0
Vaginal flora
Nugent score: score from 0 to 10: 0 to 3: normal flora predominantly lactobacilli, 4 to 6: intermediate flora with scant lactobacilli and associated with other poorly differentiated bacterial morphotypes in small quantities, 7 to 10: suggestive of bacterial vaginosis
Time frame: Week 6
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Patient satisfaction Patient satisfaction
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C): Patients will be classified into 3 categories according to their score: deterioration (score of 1 to 3), stable (score of 4), improvement (score of 5 to 7)
Time frame: Week 6