Anemia is a frequent complication of gastrointestinal bleeding, affecting 61% of the patients. Currently, anemia caused by gastrointestinal bleeding can be treated with iron supplementation. However, the dose and route of the administration are still a question. The FIERCE clinical trial aims to compare the effect of intravenous iron supplementation and oral iron replacement on mortality, unplanned emergency visits, and hospital readmissions in multimorbid patients with acute nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding.
In gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common complication, affecting more than 60% of the patients. There are two pillars of the treatment of acute GIB. First, the bleeding point needs identification and endoscopic treatment. Second, the resulting hypovolemia and anemia require fluid resuscitation, transfusion, and replacement of the lost iron. There are two simple ways to manage IDA after acute GIB. Patients either have intravenous (IV) iron infusions one to six times as part of their hospital treatment or receive three months of oral iron supplementation. There is a gap in current guidelines on which approach clinicians should choose. Here the investigators plan a multicentric, two-arm, randomized controlled trial, to compare the efficacy of oral and intravenous iron supplementation in multimorbid patients with acute nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to two groups. Group A will receive one dose of 1000 mg of IV ferric carboxymaltose on the day of randomization, while iron supplementation for group B will be performed with one ferrous sulfate tablet every day (ca. 200-300 mg) for three months. The primary outcome will be the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, unplanned emergency visit, and unplanned hospital readmission within six months after enrollment. In the first phase, the investigators plan to recruit 15 patients on each arm to assess the proportion of the primary outcome in the two groups. In the second phase, a sample size calculation for the primary outcome will be performed based on the results of the first phase.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Ca. 200-300 mg of ferrous sulfate will be administered orally every day for 3 months.
One dose of intravenous 1000 mg ferric carboxymaltose will be administered on the day of randomization.
Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs
Pécs, Hungary
Composite outcome
The composite endpoint includes all-cause mortality, unplanned emergency visit (general practitioner or emergency outpatient clinic), and unplanned hospital admission for any reason. The investigators will calculate the proportion of the outcome in each arm.
Time frame: 3 months
All-cause mortality
Death from any cause. The proportion of the outcome will be calculated in each arm and compared between the arms. The investigators will compare subgroups of patients based on the cause of mortality.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months
Unplanned emergency visits
Emergency visit from any cause. The proportion of the outcome will be calculated in each arm and compared between the arms. The investigators will compare subgroups of patients based on the cause of unplanned emergency visits.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months
Unplanned hospital admission
Hospital admission from any cause. The proportion of the outcome will be calculated in each arm and compared between the arms. The investigators will compare subgroups of patients based on the cause of unplanned admission.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months
Quality of life using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey
Changes in quality of life measured with the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire compared to baseline.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Quality of life using the EuroQol five-dimensions - 5 levels questionnare
Changes in quality of life measured with the EuroQol five-dimensions - 5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire compared to baseline.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
570
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Gait speed
Changes in gait speed compared to baseline. Gait speed will be evaluated on a 4-meter flat walking path.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Changes in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) compared to baseline.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Handgrip strength
Changes in handgrip strength compared to baseline.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Normalization of the haemoglobin level
The percentage of participants with Hb levels of ≥12 g/dL in women and ≥13 g/d, compared to baseline.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Change in Hb level
Absolute change from baseline to follow-up in Hb level.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Change in haematocrit
Absolute change from baseline to follow-up in haematocrit.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Change in serum iron level
Absolute change from baseline to follow-up in serum iron level.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Change in serum transferrin level
Absolute change from baseline to follow-up in serum transferrin level.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Change in transferrin saturation
Absolute change from baseline to follow-up in transferrin saturation.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Change in soluble transferrin receptor concentration
Absolute change from baseline to follow-up in soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) concentration.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Change in ferritin level
Absolute change from baseline to follow-up in ferritin level.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Change in the number of reticulocytes
Absolute change from baseline to follow-up in the number of reticulocytes.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Change in the number of erythrocytes
Absolute change from baseline to follow-up in the number of erythrocytes.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Change in the total iron-binding capacity
Absolute change from baseline to follow-up in the total iron-binding capacity (TIBC).
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Change in erythropoietin level
Absolute change from baseline to follow-up in erythropoietin level.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Change in C-reactive protein level
Absolute change from baseline to follow-up in the C-reactive protein level.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Change in hepcidin level
Absolute change from baseline to follow-up in hepcidin level.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Change in phosphate level
Absolute change from baseline to follow-up in phosphate level.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Discontinuation of the treatment due to adverse events
The percentage of discontinuation in the two arms.
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days
Cost-effectiveness
The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER): incremental costs divided by incremental effectiveness .
Time frame: 1, and 3 months +/- 7 days