The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of coformulated favezelimab/pembrolizumab (MK-4280A) in participants with metastatic colorectal cancer. The study will also compare MK-4280A with the standard of care treatment of regorafenib and TAS-102 (trifluridine and tipiracil). The primary study hypothesis is that coformulated favezelimab/pembrolizumab (MK-4280A) is superior to standard of care with respect to overall survival.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
441
Coformulated favezelimab/pembrolizumab (800 mg/200 mg), IV infusion
Oral
Oral
Georgetown University Hospital ( Site 1148)
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Sibley Memorial Hospital ( Site 1143)
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers, a Service of Wellstar Cobb Hospital-Research ( Site 1118)
Marietta, Georgia, United States
Norton Cancer Institute ( Site 1139)
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey ( Site 1105)
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.
Time frame: Up to approximately 33 months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 by BICR or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD.
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a confirmed complete response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesion) per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR.
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR
For participants who demonstrate confirmed CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions), duration of response was defined as the time from the first documented evidence of CR or PR until progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. DOR for participants who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis was to be censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions as well as an absolute increase of at least a 5 mm in the sum of diameters. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. DOR assessments were based on blinded central imaging review with confirmation.
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event (AE)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.
Time frame: Up to approximately 31 months
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 28 months
Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (Item 29) and Quality of Life (Item 30) Combined Score
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to the questions regarding Global Health Status (GHS; "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and Quality of Life (QoL; "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) is computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 8 weeks
Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning (Items 1-5) Score
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1-5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicates a better outcome
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 8 weeks
Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss (Item 13) Score
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire, including a single-item scale score for appetite loss (QLQ-C30 Item 13). For this item, individual responses to the question "Have you lacked appetite?" are given on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all; 4=Very much). Scores are transformed to a range from 0-100, with a lower score indicating a better outcome. The change from baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 appetite loss (Item 13) scale score will be presented.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 8 weeks
Change From Baseline in EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal Cancer-Specific 29 Items (QLQ-CR29) Bloating (Item 37) Score
The EORTC QLQ-CR29 is a health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire specific for colorectal cancer, including a single-item scale score for bloating (QLQ-CR29 Item 37). For this item, individual responses to the question "Did you have a bloated feeling in your abdomen?" are given on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all; 4=Very much). Scores are transformed to a range from 0-100, with a lower score indicating a better outcome. The change from baseline in the EORTC QLQ-CR29 bloating (Item 37) scale score will be presented.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 8 weeks
Time to Deterioration (TTD) in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) Combined Score
TTD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a ≥10-point deterioration (decrease) from baseline in GHS (EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 29) \& QoL combined score (EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 30). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) was computed by averaging raw scores of the 2 items and applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicates a better outcome. The TTD, as assessed based on a ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score, will be presented. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 38 months
TTD in EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning (Items 1-5) Combined Score
TTD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a ≥10-point deterioration (decrease) from baseline in physical functioning score (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicates a better outcome. The TTD, as assessed based on a ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score, will be presented. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 38 months
TTD in in EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss (Item 13) Score
TTD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a ≥10-point deterioration (decrease) from baseline in appetite loss score (EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 13). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The TTD, as assessed based on a ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in physical functioning score, will be presented. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 38 months
TTD in EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal Cancer-Specific 29 Items (QLQ-CR29) Bloating (Item 37) Score
TTD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a ≥10-point deterioration (decrease) from baseline in bloating score (QLQ-CR29 Item 37). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The TTD, as assessed based on a ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in appetite loss score, will be presented. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 38 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center ( Site 1703)
New York, New York, United States
Oregon Health & Science University ( Site 1141)
Portland, Oregon, United States
MUSC Hollings Cancer Center ( Site 1715)
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
The West Clinic, PLLC dba West Cancer Center ( Site 1149)
Germantown, Tennessee, United States
UT Southwestern Medical Center ( Site 1709)
Dallas, Texas, United States
...and 142 more locations