The main goal of this trial is to inform about long-term safety and tolerability of eptinezumab in participants with chronic cluster headache.
The participants who take part in this trial will be asked to stay in the trial for about a year. The participants will be asked to visit the trial site 7 times during the trial. In between trial site visits, they will have scheduled phone calls with the trial site staff. They will also be asked to keep track of their cluster headaches at home with a headache diary.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
131
Eptinezumab will be administered per schedule specified in the arm description.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as any on-treatment untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A summary of non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.
Time frame: From the day of first dose of study drug (Baseline [Week 0]) up to Week 56
Conversion From Chronic Cluster Headache (cCH) to Episodic Cluster Headache (eCH): Number of Participants With No Cluster Headache (CH) Attacks for ≥3 Consecutive Months (≥12 Consecutive Weeks)
Participants counted as converting from cCH to eCH if they had no CH attacks for at least 3 months.
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 48
Change From Baseline in Weekly Number of Times an Abortive Therapy (Oxygen and/or Triptans) Was Used
Abortive therapy was defined as oxygen and/or triptans, where it counted as 2 times if oxygen and triptans were used for the same attack.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 25, 26, 27, 28, 37, 38, 39, 40
Change From Baseline in Weekly Number of Times An Abortive Therapy (Oxygen) Was Used
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 25, 26, 27, 28, 37, 38, 39, 40
Change From Baseline in Weekly Number of Times An Abortive Therapy (Triptans) Were Used
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 25, 26, 27, 28, 37, 38, 39, 40
Change From Baseline in the Average Number of Weekly Attacks
The participant completed a CH eDiary, daily, and record for each day/week whether he/she had any CH attacks.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
New England Institute for Neurology and Headache
Stamford, Connecticut, United States
Michigan Headache and Neurological Institute
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Dent Neurologic Institute - Amherst
Amherst, New York, United States
Cleveland Clinic - Neurological Institute
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital - Center City Campus
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Rigshospitalet Glostrup
Glostrup Municipality, Capital Region, Denmark
Hospitalsenhed Midt og Regionshospitalet Viborg
Viborg, Central Jutland, Denmark
Terveystalo Ruoholahti
Helsinki, Southern Finland, Finland
Terveystalo Turku Pulssi
Turku, Western Finland, Finland
Hôpital Cimiez
Nice, Côte-d'Or, France
...and 21 more locations
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 25, 26, 27, 28, 37, 38, 39, 40
Change From Baseline in the Number of Weekly Attacks
The average of the estimated change from baseline in the number of weekly attacks across the first 4 weeks after the infusion is shown.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 1-4
Change From Baseline in the Number of Weekly Attacks
The average of the estimated change from baseline in the number of weekly attacks across the first 2 weeks after the infusion is shown.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 1-2
Change From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Attacks
The average of the estimated change from baseline in the number of monthly attacks across the first 12 months after the infusion is shown.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Months 1-12
Change From Baseline in the Average Attack Related Daily Pain (Including Days With no Attacks), as Assessed Using the 5-point Self-rating Pain Severity Scale
The severity of pain for each attack was rated on an ordinal scale that ranged from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating more headache pain (headache pain ratings: 0 = none/barely any pain; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe; 4 = excruciating).
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 25, 26, 27, 28, 37, 38, 39, 40
Response: Number of Participants With ≥30% Reduction From Baseline in Number of Weekly Attacks
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 25, 26, 27, 28, 37, 38, 39, 40
Response: Number of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Number of Weekly Attacks
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 25, 26, 27, 28, 37, 38, 39, 40
Response: Number of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in Number of Weekly Attacks
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 25, 26, 27, 28, 37, 38, 39, 40
cCH Remission: Number of Participants With No Cluster Headache Attacks For ≥1 Month (>=4 Consecutive Weeks)
Participants counted as being in remission if they had no cluster headache attacks for at least 1 month.
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 48
cCH Remission: Number of Participants With No Cluster Headache Attacks For ≥1 Month (>=4 Consecutive Weeks Between the First and Second Infusion)
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 12
cCH Remission: Number of Participants With No Cluster Headache Attacks For ≥1 Month (>=4 Consecutive Weeks Between the Second and Third Infusion)
Time frame: Week 13 to Week 24
cCH Remission: Number of Participants With No Cluster Headache Attacks For ≥1 Month (>=4 Consecutive Weeks Between the Third and Fourth Infusion)
Time frame: Week 25 to Week 36
cCH Remission: Number of Participants With No Cluster Headache Attacks For ≥1 Month (>=4 Consecutive Weeks Within the First 12 Weeks After the Fourth Infusion)
Time frame: Week 37 to Week 48
Number of Participants Who Received a Transitional Therapy During the Treatment Period
Transitional treatments were defined as greater occipital nerve (GON) block or oral steroids.
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 48
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score
The PGIC is a patient-reported measure of improvement in pain sensation and quality of life scored on a scale from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Lower scores indicate better health status.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48
Change From Baseline in Sleep Impact Scale (SIS) Domain Scores Over the Time
The SIS is a patient-reported clinical outcome assessment used to assess quality of life resulting from sleep disturbance. The SIS questionnaire includes 35 items belonging to 7 domains to assess sleep impact on: daily activities; emotional well-being; emotional impact; energy/fatigue; social well-being; mental fatigue; and satisfaction with sleep. Each item, for 6 out of the 7 domains, is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (always or all of the time) to 5 (never or none of the time), whereas satisfaction with sleep is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very satisfied) to 5 (very dissatisfied). Each domain yields a score ranging from 0 to 100, which is presented here. A higher score for Daily Activities, Emotional Well-being, Emotional Impact, Energy/Fatigue, Social Well-being, and Mental Fatigue indicates better quality of life. A lower score for Satisfaction with Sleep indicates a higher quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 12, 16, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Score at Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 48
The EQ-5D-5L is a patient-reported assessment designed to measure the participant's well-being. It consists of 5 descriptive items (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and depression/anxiety). Each descriptive item is rated on a 5-point index ranging from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems).
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40, 48
Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 48
The EQ-5D-5L VAS is a participant-reported assessment designed to measure the participant's well-being and ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40, 48
Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment: General Health Second Version (WPAI:GH2.0) Sub-Scores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 48
The WPAI:GH2.0 is a patient self-rated clinical outcome assessment designed to provide a quantitative measure of the work productivity and activity impairment due to a health condition. The WPAI:GH2.0 assesses activities over the preceding 7 days and consists of 6 items: 1 item assesses employment (yes/no); 3 items assess the number of hours worked, the number of hours missed from work due to the participant's condition, or due to other reasons; and 2 visual numerical scales assess how much the participant's condition affects his/her productivity at work and his/her ability to complete normal daily activities. Each item (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) was calculated into an impairment percentage ranging from 0 to 100%, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity (i.e. worse outcomes). Change from baseline for each item is shown here.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40, 48
Health Care Resource Utilization - Number of Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner
Number of participants who visited a family doctor/general practitioner has been reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40, 48
Health Care Resource Utilization - Number of Visits to a Specialist
Number of participants who visited a specialist has been reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40, 48
Health Care Resource Utilization - Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Cluster Headache
Number of participants who visited an emergency department due to CH has been reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40, 48
Health Care Resource Utilization - Number of Hospital Admissions Due to Cluster Headache
Number of participants admitted to the hospital due to CH has been reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40, 48
Health Care Resource Utilization - Total Number of Overnight Hospital Stays Due to Cluster Headache
Number of participants who had overnight hospital stays due to CH has been reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40, 48