The BIPLONG (The Bipolar Disorder in the Longitudinal Course ) study is a longitudinal study on the course of bipolar disorders and comprises two sub-studies: On the one hand, BIPLONG examines the genetic foundation and change in bipolar disorder, on the other hand, metabolic changes, clinical symptoms and cognition in bipolar disorders is evaluated. A current subproject of BIPLONG is the analysis of the psychological response of the COVID-19 (Corona virus disease) pandemic. With the parameters examined in BIPLONG, it is hoped to gain better understanding of the bipolar disorder in the longitudinal course.
Study Procedure: In addition to the bipolar patients, healthy controls will also be included. The same inventories will be used for the control subjects and the same examinations or visits will be performed; bipolar-specific disease questions will not be asked in controls. Intervention: Longitudinal study Method: All patients and controls undergo several assessments every six months: Blood samples are collected with the following main parameters of interest being examined: * Collection and analysis of DNA, establishment of permanent cell lines, determination of mRNA and gene products (proteins), proteomics, lipidomics. * Routine parameters: Blood count, TSH, T3, T4, homocysteine, creatinine, amylase, lipase, CK, urea, uric acid, coagulation, HBA1c, glucose, lipids (triglyceryl, LDL, HDL, cholesterol, mass spectrometry), transaminases, CRP- levels, vitamin D. * Biomarkers: oxidative stress parameters and antioxidants, neuroinflammatory markers (e.g. interleukins, tumor necrosis factor, interferons, GDNF, VEGF, etc.), neurotrophins (BDNF, NT, Trk..), insulin, IGF, adipokines, Apo-E and AAT analysis, tryptophan/kynurenine metabolites * Intestinal hormones grehlin, glucagon-like peptides 1 and 2 (GLP-1/2) and cholecystokinin Additionally, socio-demographic data and psychological data are collected by administering self-assessment questionnaires. Further, neurocognitive tests are administered. The current psychological and psychiatric state of all subjects is examined by external ratings done by experts. Anthropomethric measures are examined (waist-to-hip ratio, blood pressure, weight, height). Additionally, MRI is conducted on all subjects (for patients every 6 months, for controls every 12 months). Primary hypothesis: * Gene-environment interactions are significantly contributory to bipolar affective disorder. * There are pathologically altered neurobiological markers that play a role in the pathogenesis of bipolar disorder. * There is an influence of anthropometric data on the course of bipolar disorder. Statistical analysis and anticipated sample size: Baseline data analysis will be investigated using a multi-factorial between subject design, with the variables of group (bipolar patients versus healthy controls), gender (males versus females), weight (normal weight versus overweight), etc. as independent factors, depending on the research question. As dependent variables, in addition to sociodemographic and clinical variables (number of episodes, etc.), physiological parameters (blood parameters, anthropometry and lipometer data, EEG, ECG, MRI) and psychological variables (psychological questionnaires) will be investigated. Likewise, covariates such as age or body mass index will be included as needed. Correlation analyses (bivariate, partial) should show possible correlations between the variables. Discriminant analyses should find out which variable best separates the investigated groups (e.g. patients vs. controls). Furthermore, regression analyses (linear, multiple) will be performed to obtain additional information about the predictive value of the variables under investigation. All analyses will be computed using IBM SPSS Statistics 20. For the "a priori analysis" of the follow-up study (T1-T5), a repeated measures design (repeated measures within factors) was adopted. The case number calculation (effect size d between .30 and .80; Cohen, 1988) for the F-test thus results in a sample size of 47 patients with a target effect size of .40 (power 95%; alpha .05; calculated with GPower 3.1). The correlation analyses at the first measurement time point (power .95, alpha .05, effect size: .35) yields 79 subjects per group (Pat. vs. controls) at all time-points.
Medical University Graz
Graz, Styria, Austria
RECRUITINGCVLT- california verbal learning test
The California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) provides a brief and individualized assessment of verbal learning strategies and processes. The higher the score, the better the outcome
Time frame: at six months
STROOP Farbe-Wort-Interferenz-Test (FWIT)
As an objective and reliable multidimensional performance test, the Color-Word. The Interference Test measures elementary information processing skills (selection, encoding, and decoding) in the visual-verbal functional domain. The lower the score, the better the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
D2-R
To measure the subject's ability to concentrate and the speed and accuracy in distinguishing similar visual stimuli. The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
"Reading the eyes of the mind" =Theory of mind
measurement of the ability to detect social cues. The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
Trail Making Test A/B, TMT-A
Measurement of cognitive processing speed, as well as linguistic, executive, and attentional components. The lower the score, the better the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
Mehrfachwahl Wortschatz Test (MWT-B)
Measurement of the general intelligence level. The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
Number Symbol Test
Measurement of processing speed. The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
560
Number Repeat
Measurement of working memory. The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
Beck Depressions Inventar II (BDI-II)
Measurement of depression severity; 21 items on a scale of 0-3 (ascending). The higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
Manie-Selbstbeurteilungsskala (MSS) (self-rating scale)
Measurement of manic symptoms; 48 items (dichotomous). The higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
Questionnaire of religiosity
socio-demographic assesment of religiosity; 2 items.
Time frame: at six months
Big Five Inventory-10 (BFI-10)
Measurement of personality variables; 10 items on a scale of 1-5 (ascending).
Time frame: at six months
World Health Organisation Quality of Life (WHOQOL Bref)
Measurement of life-quality and health; 26 items on a scale of 1-5 (ascending).
Time frame: at six months
Life Event Questionnaire (LEQ)
Measurement of life events and their influence; 79 items on a scale of 0-3 (ascending)
Time frame: at six months
Temperament and affective disorders (TEMPS-A)-Scale
35 items on a scale of 1-5 (ascending). The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
Brief symptom inventory (BSI)
Measurement of psychological symptoms; 53 items on a scale of 0-4 (ascending). The higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
Anhedonia scale (AS)
Measurement of Anhedonia; 14 items on a scale of 1-4 (ascending). The higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-GS-D)
Measurement of burnout symptoms; 16 items on a scale of 1-6 (ascending). The higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
Resources in Sexuality and Partnership (RSP)
Measurement of relationship emotions; 25 items on a scale of 1-5 (ascending).The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
Satisfaction in the couple relationship (ZIP)
Measurement of relationship satisfaction; 7 items on a scale of 1-5 (ascending), 3 items open questioned. The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
Demographic Data
Measurement of demographic data
Time frame: at six months
Questionnaire of current life situation
Measurement of demographic and diagnostic data;
Time frame: at six months
Anthropometric Data - weight
Measurement of weight
Time frame: at six months
Anthropometric Data- height
Measurement of height
Time frame: at six months
Anthropometric Data - waist-to-hip ratio
Measurement of waist-to-hip ratio
Time frame: at six months
Anthropometric Data - blood pressure
Measurement of blood pressure
Time frame: at six months
Clinical Global Impression (CGI)
External rating of a symptom severity; 2 items on a scale of 0-7 (ascending). The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
Global Assessment Scale of Functioning (GAF)
External rating of level of functioning; 1 item on a scale of 1-100 (ascending). The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD)
External rating of depression symptoms; 21 items on a scale of 0-4 (ascending).The higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
External rating of manic symptoms; 11 items on a scale of 0-4/0-8 (ascending). The higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
Specific Level of Functioning Assessment and Physical health Inventory (SLOF)
External rating of functioning; 43 items on a scale of 1-5 (ascending), 2 items open questioned. The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Time frame: at six months
Supplementary Data for External Rating
External rating of bipolar symptoms; 7 items.
Time frame: at six months