This study is multi-center, open label, two-by-two factorial, randomized, noninferiority trial to compare the efficacy and safety of polymer-free cobalt-chromium thin drug-coated stents (BioFreedom Ultra) with biodegradable polymer ultrathin sirolimus-eluting stents (Orsiro Mission) and prasugrel monotherapy after 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) of aspirin plus prasugrel with 12-month DAPT of aspirin plus prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Polymer is the key component of drug-eluting stents (DES) for facilitation of drug loading and control of drug release. However, durable polymer of the 1st generation DES has been considered to induce inflammation and to be associated with fatal complications such as very late stent thrombosis. To overcome this shortcoming, biodegradable polymer has been applied to the DES system. In several head-to-head comparison, ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent demonstrated comparable or superior outcomes compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents. As a result, Orsiro stent is considered one of the standard contemporary DESs. On the other hand, polymer-free drug-coated stents (DCS) have been developed as an alternative to durable and biodegradable polymer DES. The biolimus A9-coated BioFreedom stent is the representative polymer-free drug-coated stent and was superior to a bare-metal stent in patients treated with 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, it failed to show noninferiority for major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months when compared with the ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent in an all-comers population, mainly due to increased target lesion revascularization (TLR). On top of possible insufficient or uncontrolled drug delivery at stented site due to absence of a drug carrier, thick strut (112 µm) and stainless steel alloy may explain a higher rate of TLR in the BioFreedom stent group compared with the Orsiro stent group. The BioFreedom Ultra stent is a novel cobalt-chromium thin stent (84 µm) with biolimus A9-coating. With advancement in stent alloy and strut thickness, treatment efficacy and safety of the BioFreedom Ultra stent would be comparable to the new version of Orsiro stent (Orsiro Mission) among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DES are currently recommended to use 12 months of DAPT, consisting of aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor. Although use of DAPT reduces ischemic events, including stent thrombosis, bleeding events increase in return. Hence, considering the aforementioned advancement of stent devices, shorter duration of DAPT and switching to a potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy would be possible. This has been demonstrated in several recent studies. However, although prasugrel was superior to ticagrelor in lowering ischemic events, these studies mainly used ticagrelor as a solely used antiplatelet agent, and studies verifying the effect of prasugrel monotherapy after short duration of DAPT are limited to date. In addition, in these studies, DAPT was maintained for mostly at least 3 months in the ACS situation. With advancement of devices, duration of DAPT may be further reduced. In other words, prasugrel monotherapy after 1 month of DAPT of aspirin plus prasugrel would be comparable to 12-month DAPT of aspirin plus prasugrel.
1:1 randomization to biodegradable polymer DES (Orsiro Mission) and polymer-free DCS (Biofreedom)
1:1 randomization to 1-month DAPT thereafter prasugrel monotherapy and 12-month DAPT (aspirin + prasugrel)
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
Stent Comparison Study: target-lesion failure (TLF)
a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization by percutaneous or surgical methods
Time frame: 1 year
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: net adverse clinical events (NACE)
a composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and clinically relevant bleeding
Time frame: 1 year
Stent Comparison Study: TLF
a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization by percutaneous or surgical methods
Time frame: 3 years
Stent Comparison Study: target-vessel failure
a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-MI, or clinically indicated target-vessel revascularization by percutaneous or surgical methods
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
Stent Comparison Study: cardiac death
cardiac death
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
Stent Comparison Study: target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI)
target-vessel MI
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
Stent Comparison Study: clinically indicated TLR
clinically indicated TLR
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
Stent Comparison Study: stent thrombosis
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
definite or probable by Academic Research Consortium \[ARC\] definition
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
Stent Comparison Study: clinically indicated target-vessel revascularization (TVR)
clinically indicated target-vessel revascularization (TVR)
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
Stent Comparison Study: cardiac death or MI
cardiac death or MI
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
Stent Comparison Study: cardiac death, MI, or stent thrombosis
cardiac death, MI, or stent thrombosis
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
Stent Comparison Study: all-cause death
all-cause death
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
Stent Comparison Study: MI
MI
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
Stent Comparison Study: all-cause death or MI
all-cause death or MI
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
Stent Comparison Study: any revascularization
any revascularization
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
Stent Comparison Study: restricted mean survival time for the TLF
restricted mean survival time for the TLF
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: MACCE
a composite of all-cause death, MI, and stroke
Time frame: 1 year
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: clinically relevant bleeding
bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding
Time frame: 1 year
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: all-cause death
all-cause death
Time frame: 1 year
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: MI
MI
Time frame: 1 year
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: stroke
stroke
Time frame: 1 year
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: cardiac death
cardiac death
Time frame: 1 year
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: stent thrombosis
definite or probable by ARC definition
Time frame: 1 year
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: all-cause death or MI
all-cause death or MI
Time frame: 1 year
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: cardiac death or MI
cardiac death or MI
Time frame: 1 year
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: cardiac death, MI, or stent thrombosis
cardiac death, MI, or stent thrombosis
Time frame: 1 year
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding
BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding
Time frame: 1 year
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: restricted mean survival time for the NACE
restricted mean survival time for the NACE
Time frame: 1 year